Effects of intensity variation on human auditory evoked magnetic fields.

We recorded auditory evoked magnetic fields from 6 healthy subjects with a 122-channel whole-head neuromagnetometer. The stimuli were 200-ms 1-kHz tones delivered at 4 different intensities (40, 50, 60, and 65 dB HL). The tones were given once every second, binaurally in the first session, and monaurally to each ear in the second one. The four intensities were presented randomly and equiprobably within a single sequence. In both stimulus conditions, the 100-ms response (N100m) decreased in latency and increased in amplitude as a function of intensity in both hemispheres. No systematic dependence was found between stimulus intensity and the N100m source location in the auditory cortex. Our study illustrates a noninvasive method to examine the functional properties of human auditory cortex, allowing simultaneous comparison between signals arising from both hemispheres.

[1]  C. Nordling,et al.  Wavelengths and energy levels of the 4d95s-4d95p transition array of Xe IX , 1994 .

[2]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[3]  K. Lehnertz,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  R Llinás,et al.  Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex revealed by multi-channel SQUID system. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  Peter Heil,et al.  Topographic representation of tone intensity along the isofrequency axis of cat primary auditory cortex , 1994, Hearing Research.

[6]  C. Elberling,et al.  Auditory magnetic fields: source location and 'tonotopical organization' in the right hemisphere of the human brain. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[7]  N. Suga,et al.  Neural basis of amplitude-spectrum representation in auditory cortex of the mustached bat. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[9]  L. Parkkonen,et al.  122-channel squid instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain , 1993 .

[10]  K. Lehnertz,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  D P Phillips,et al.  Responses of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex to tonal stimulation. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  C. Elberling,et al.  Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex. Influence of stimulus intensity. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology.

[14]  D. Irvine,et al.  Sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex to tones and frequency-modulated stimuli. II: Organization of response properties along the ‘isofrequency’ dimension , 1992, Hearing Research.

[15]  Masahiro Nasu,et al.  Spatio-temporal representation of sound intensity in the guinea pig auditory cortex observed by optical recording , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  R Hari,et al.  Neuromagnetic cortical signals in a patient with hydrocephalus. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[17]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Neurons in the cat's primary auditory cortex distinguished by their responses to tones and wide-spectrum noise , 1985, Hearing Research.

[18]  R. Hari.  The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex , 1990 .

[19]  K Saermark,et al.  Dependence of the auditory evoked magnetic field (100 msec signal) of the human brain on the intensity of the stimulus. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole‐head neuromagnetic recordings , 1993 .