The reliability of using accelerometer and gyroscope for gait event identification on persons with dropped foot.

Identification of gait events using an optimal sensor set and a reliable algorithm would be useful in the clinical evaluation of patients with dropped foot. This article describes a threshold detection method for identifying gait events and evaluating the reliability of a system on ten subjects with dropped foot and three non-impaired controls. The system comprised three sensor units of accelerometers and gyroscopes attached at the thigh, shank and foot of the impaired leg in subjects with dropped foot, and the dominant leg in the controls. A performance index was devised to compare the values of different measuring directions of the sensor units and evaluate the system's reliability. The performance index, with the ideal value equal to 1, depended on the classification accuracy and timing variation of the turning points. These were obtained from the threshold detection method that distinguished the absolute maximum and minimum turning points from local maximum and minimum turning points. It was found that some specific turning points could effectively identify gait events with a high median value in the performance index. These turning points included: the minimum turning point in superior-inferior acceleration on the thigh at loading response (0.972); the minimum turning point in anterior-posterior angular velocity on the shank at pre-swing (0.955) and the maximum turning point in superior-inferior acceleration on the foot at initial swing (0.954). Combining the results of sensor measurements in different orientations and attachment locations could be used for gait event identification. It was shown that the threshold detection method is reliable. Portable gait-monitoring devices can be used for monitoring of daily activities and functional control.

[1]  F. Zajac,et al.  Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[2]  S. Jonic,et al.  Three machine learning techniques for automatic determination of rules to control locomotion , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  F Su,et al.  Fuzzy clustering of gait patterns of patients after ankle arthrodesis based on kinematic parameters. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Stair climbing detection during daily physical activity using a miniature gyroscope. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[5]  K. Y. Tong,et al.  Command control for functional electrical stimulation hand grasp systems using miniature accelerometers and gyroscopes , 2003, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  M H Granat,et al.  A practical gait analysis system using gyroscopes. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[8]  M.R. Popovic,et al.  A reliable gait phase detection system , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Peter H Veltink,et al.  Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Jin-Shin Lai,et al.  Neural network and fuzzy control in FES-assisted locomotion for the hemiplegic , 2004, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[11]  M. Hansen, M. K. Haugland,et al.  Adaptive fuzzy logic restriction rules for error correction and safe stimulation patterns during functional electrical stimulation , 2001, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[12]  R Williamson,et al.  Sensor systems for lower limb functional electrical stimulation (FES) control. , 2000, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Angelo M. Sabatini,et al.  Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  R Williamson,et al.  Gait event detection for FES using accelerometers and supervised machine learning. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  K. Y. Tong,et al.  Reliability of neural-network functional electrical stimulation gait-control system , 2006, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  B. Auvinet,et al.  Reference data for normal subjects obtained with an accelerometric device. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[17]  G. Wu,et al.  The study of kinematic transients in locomotion using the integrated kinematic sensor. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  G. Lyons,et al.  The use of accelerometry to detect heel contact events for use as a sensor in FES assisted walking. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  T Sinkjaer,et al.  Adaptive restriction rules provide functional and safe stimulation pattern for foot drop correction. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[20]  Howard Jay Chizeck,et al.  Fuzzy model identification for classification of gait events in paraplegics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[21]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  R B Stein,et al.  Application of tilt sensors in functional electrical stimulation. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.