Diagnosing a firm's internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship

Apple, 3M, Procter & Gamble, and Google know the importance of an internal environment supportive of innovative activity. But how is that environment identified or measured? As research on corporate entrepreneurial activity has evolved, numerous researchers have acknowledged the importance of internal organizational dimensions to promoting and supporting an environment for innovation. This research has identified five specific dimensions that are important determinants of an environment conducive to entrepreneurial behavior: (1) top management support, (2) work discretion/autonomy, (3) rewards/reinforcement, (4) time availability, and (5) organizational boundaries. If an organization is serious about developing an internal environment conducive to entrepreneurial activity, then it must seek to measure the specific dimensions associated with an innovative environment. In this article we introduce an instrument, the Corporate Entrepreneurship Assessment Instrument (CEAI), as a diagnostic tool used for assessing managers’ perceptions of the five major dimensions critical to creating an entrepreneurial/innovative environment. This instrument provides an indication of a firm's likelihood of being able to successfully implement an innovative strategy, and highlights areas of the internal work environment that should be the focus of ongoing development efforts.

[1]  D. Kuratko,et al.  Perception of Internal Factors for Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Canadian and U.S. Managers , 1999 .

[2]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Building breakthrough businesses within established organizations. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[3]  R. V. Wyk,et al.  Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship , 2012 .

[4]  G. Huber,et al.  Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities , 2001 .

[5]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  Resources, Environmental Change and Survival: Asymmetric Paths of Young Independent and Subsidiary Organizations , 2011 .

[6]  Donald F. Kuratko,et al.  Entrepreneurship: Theory, Process, Practice , 2006 .

[7]  M. Hitt,et al.  The new competitive landscape , 1995 .

[8]  Jennifer P. Bott,et al.  Managers' corporate entrepreneurial actions: Examining perception and position , 2009 .

[9]  D. Kuratko,et al.  Developing an Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for an Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment , 1990 .

[10]  J. Bishop,et al.  Managers’ Corporate Entrepreneurial Actions and Job Satisfaction , 2005 .

[11]  Daniel T. Holt,et al.  Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2013 .

[12]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurship & Innovation , 2007 .

[13]  J. C. Goodale,et al.  Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance , 2011 .

[14]  Jeffrey S. Hornsby,et al.  Innovation Acceleration: Transforming Organizational Thinking , 2011 .

[15]  Todd A. Finkle,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Silicon Valley: The Case of Google, Inc. , 2012 .

[16]  Donald F. Kuratko,et al.  The entrepreneurial imperative of the 21st century , 2009 .

[17]  R. Ireland,et al.  Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy , 2009 .

[18]  R. Ireland,et al.  A Model of Middle–Level Managers’ Entrepreneurial Behavior , 2005 .

[19]  S. Zahra,et al.  Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale , 2002 .

[20]  R. Ireland,et al.  Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia's corporate entrepreneurship strategy , 2001 .

[21]  Matthew W. Rutherford,et al.  Corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical look at the innovativeness dimension and its antecedents , 2007 .