The “economic–finance interface” for eco-innovation projects

Abstract It is widely accepted that eco-innovation is a feasible direction if we want to progress towards sustainable development. However, in many European countries, eco-innovation projects are currently not common because of the significant barriers to and the negligible culture of including eco-innovation in an organisation's strategy. In this scenario, the analysis of eco-innovation project determinants offers a new strategic approach for industries to manage sustainable innovation initiatives. A specific methodology has been developed for this purpose to analyse the main characteristics of 44 applied eco-innovation projects. The purpose of the methodology described in this paper is to define the “economic–finance interface” between these projects and the main characteristics of firms in which such eco-innovation has been applied and to provide guidance in the implementation of eco-innovation to align project management with business strategy.

[1]  V. Marchi ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND R&D COOPERATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2012 .

[2]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[3]  He-Boong Kwon,et al.  Implementation of strategic green orientation in supply chain , 2009 .

[4]  Jeffrey Davidson,et al.  Providing Clarity and A Common Language to the “Fuzzy Front End” , 2001 .

[5]  A. Jasiński,et al.  Barriers for Eco-Innovations: A Case Study of a Small Firm in Poland , 2013 .

[6]  Ian Jenson,et al.  Testing innovation systems theory using Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2016 .

[7]  John M. Nicholas,et al.  Successful project management: a force-field analysis , 1989 .

[8]  Lynn M. Martin,et al.  Exploring business growth and eco innovation in rural small firms , 2013 .

[9]  S. R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[10]  Tahir Masood Qureshi,et al.  Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model , 2009 .

[11]  Dean Bartlett,et al.  Green technology and eco‐innovation , 2010 .

[12]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) As an Approach , 2009 .

[13]  S. Seuring Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains: differences and interrelations , 2004 .

[14]  John Wateridge,et al.  IT projects: a basis for success , 1995 .

[15]  Erran Carmel,et al.  How project description length and expected duration affect bidding and project success in crowdsourcing software development , 2016, J. Syst. Softw..

[16]  R. Cooper Predevelopment activities determine new product success , 1988 .

[17]  M. Kunc,et al.  Benefits Realisation Management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies , 2015 .

[18]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Eco‐efficiency and Its xsTerminology , 2005 .

[19]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies , 2010 .

[20]  Kriengsak Panuwatwanich,et al.  Linking project health to project performance indicators: Multiple case studies of construction projects in Saudi Arabia , 2012 .

[21]  Beatriz Junquera,et al.  A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: implications for public policies , 2003 .

[22]  Jonathan O'Brien,et al.  The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation , 2003 .

[23]  M. Huesemann The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development , 2003 .

[24]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Corporate Ownership Around the World , 1998 .

[25]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Where process development begins: A multiple case study of front end activities in process firms , 2011 .

[26]  Graham Winch,et al.  Governing the project process: a conceptual framework , 2001 .

[27]  M. Lewis,et al.  Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects , 2002 .

[28]  C. Cocklin,et al.  Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model” , 2008 .

[29]  Jacqueline Cramer,et al.  Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs , 2002 .

[30]  Helena Forsman,et al.  TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVENESS: COMPARISON OF THE SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL ECO-INNOVATORS , 2013 .

[31]  Cheng-Feng Cheng,et al.  Configural paths to successful product innovation , 2013 .

[32]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[33]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update , 2006 .

[34]  Walter O. Rom,et al.  An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria , 2001 .

[35]  G. Silverberg,et al.  A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: the relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies , 2009 .

[36]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology , 1996 .

[37]  Alain Abran,et al.  Neural networks for predicting the duration of new software projects , 2015, J. Syst. Softw..

[38]  J. Horbach Determinants of Environmental Innovation - New Evidence from German Panel Data Sources , 2006 .

[39]  Eric G. Too,et al.  The management of project management: a conceptual framework for project governance , 2014 .

[40]  Nancy Bocken,et al.  The front-end of eco-innovation for eco-innovative small and medium sized companies , 2014 .

[41]  Sabina Scarpellini,et al.  R&D and eco-innovation: opportunities for closer collaboration between universities and companies through technology centers , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[42]  René Kemp,et al.  The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? , 2011 .

[43]  Fawzi Halila,et al.  The development and market success of eco‐innovations: A comparative study of eco‐innovations and “other” innovations in Sweden , 2011 .

[44]  Jc Ko de Ruyter,et al.  The marketing-finance interface: A relational exchange perspective , 2000 .

[45]  H. Smyth,et al.  Differences in decision-making criteria towards the return on marketing investment: A project business perspective , 2015 .

[46]  David Wilemon,et al.  Focusing the Fuzzy Front-End in New Product Development , 2002 .

[47]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[48]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Measuring eco-innovation , 2009 .

[49]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Green training supporting eco-innovation in three brazilian companies: Practices and levels of integration , 2014 .

[50]  D. Pujari Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance , 2006 .

[51]  Harold A. Kurstedt,et al.  Satisfying stakeholders for successful project management , 1991 .

[52]  Dragan Z. Milosevic,et al.  A two-way influence between business strategy and project management , 2006 .

[53]  Florence Crespin-Mazet,et al.  Sustainable procurement: Building legitimacy in the supply network , 2012 .

[54]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Bridging the chasm between survey and case study research: Research methods for achieving generalization, accuracy, and complexity , 2010 .

[55]  Hammad Akbar,et al.  Project-conceptualisation in technological innovations: A knowledge-based perspective , 2014 .

[56]  Klaus Rennings,et al.  Employment Impacts of Cleaner Production - Evidence from a German Study Using Case Studies and Surveys , 2001 .

[57]  C. Rammer,et al.  Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull , 2011 .

[58]  Henrikki Tikkanen,et al.  Relationships and project marketing success , 2002 .

[59]  Bronwyn H Hall The Financing of Research and Development , 2002 .

[60]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  Technological Invention to Product Innovation: A Project Management Approach , 2010 .

[61]  Effie Kesidou,et al.  On the Drivers of Eco-Innovations: Empirical Evidence from the UK , 2010 .

[62]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Business Strategies and Capacities for Eco-Innovation , 2011 .

[63]  Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek,et al.  Eco-innovation - putting the EU on the path to a resource and energy efficient economy : study and briefing notes , 2009 .

[64]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[65]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development , 2000 .

[66]  David Bryde,et al.  Modelling project management performance , 2003 .

[67]  Pwg Morris,et al.  Moving from Corporate Strategy to Project Strategy , 2005 .

[68]  Michael Tracey,et al.  Purchasing's role in global new product-process development projects , 2013 .

[69]  N. Blaikie Approaches to Social Enquiry , 1993 .

[70]  E Ciccozzi,et al.  Recent experiences and challenges in promoting cleaner production investments in developing countries , 2003 .