Wet-surface–enhanced ellipsometric contrast microscopy identifies slime as a major adhesion factor during bacterial surface motility

In biology, the extracellular matrix (ECM) promotes both cell adhesion and specific recognition, which is essential for central developmental processes in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, live studies of the dynamic interactions between cells and the ECM, for example during motility, have been greatly impaired by imaging limitations: mostly the ability to observe the ECM at high resolution in absence of specific staining by live microscopy. To solve this problem, we developed a unique technique, wet-surface enhanced ellipsometry contrast (Wet-SEEC), which magnifies the contrast of transparent organic materials deposited on a substrate (called Wet-surf) with exquisite sensitivity. We show that Wet-SEEC allows both the observation of unprocessed nanofilms as low as 0.2 nm thick and their accurate 3D topographic reconstructions, directly by standard light microscopy. We next used Wet-SEEC to image slime secretion, a poorly defined property of many prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms that move across solid surfaces in absence of obvious extracellular appendages (gliding). Using combined Wet-SEEC and fluorescent-staining experiments, we observed slime deposition by gliding Myxococcus xanthus cells at unprecedented resolution. Altogether, the results revealed that in this bacterium, slime associates preferentially with the outermost components of the motility machinery and promotes its adhesion to the substrate on the ventral side of the cell. Strikingly, analogous roles have been proposed for the extracellular proteoglycans of gliding diatoms and apicomplexa, suggesting that slime deposition is a general means for gliding organisms to adhere and move over surfaces.

[1]  Rym Agrebi,et al.  Emergence and Modular Evolution of a Novel Motility Machinery in Bacteria , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[2]  D Ausserré,et al.  Surface enhanced ellipsometric contrast (SEEC) basic theory and lambda/4 multilayered solutions. , 2007, Optics express.

[3]  K. Heimann,et al.  Substratum adhesion and gliding in a diatom are mediated by extracellular proteoglycans , 1997, Planta.

[4]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft Lithography. , 1998, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  F. Zernike Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects , 1942 .

[6]  W. Shi,et al.  Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis genes required for social motility in Myxococcus xanthus , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[7]  E. Hoiczyk,et al.  Spore formation in Myxococcus xanthus is tied to cytoskeleton functions and polysaccharide spore coat deposition , 2012, Molecular microbiology.

[8]  Marie-Pierre Valignat,et al.  Surface enhanced ellipsometric contrast (SEEC) basic theory and λ/4 multilayered solutions , 2007 .

[9]  Wolfgang Baumeister,et al.  The junctional pore complex, a prokaryotic secretion organelle, is the molecular motor underlying gliding motility in cyanobacteria , 1998, Current Biology.

[10]  Mingzhai Sun,et al.  Motor-driven intracellular transport powers bacterial gliding motility , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  D. Ausserré,et al.  Wide-field optical imaging of surface nanostructures. , 2006, Nano letters.

[12]  R. Ménard,et al.  Conservation of a Gliding Motility and Cell Invasion Machinery in Apicomplexan Parasites , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  J. Pate Gliding motility in Cytophaga. , 1985, Microbiological sciences.

[14]  Samuel S. Wu,et al.  Genetic and functional evidence that Type IV pili are required for social gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[15]  R P Burchard,et al.  Trail following by gliding bacteria , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  M. Bowden,et al.  The Myxococcus xanthus lipopolysaccharide O‐antigen is required for social motility and multicellular development , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  Dale Kaiser,et al.  Gliding motility and polarized slime secretion , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  James H. Naismith,et al.  Wza the translocon for E. coli capsular polysaccharides defines a new class of membrane protein , 2006, Nature.

[19]  R. Coppel,et al.  No TRAP, no invasion. , 2009, Trends in parasitology.

[20]  Qian Xu,et al.  DifA, a Methyl-Accepting Chemoreceptor Protein-Like Sensory Protein, Uses a Novel Signaling Mechanism to Regulate Exopolysaccharide Production in Myxococcus xanthus , 2010, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  A. Erbe,et al.  Tilt angle of lipid acyl chains in unilamellar vesicles determined by ellipsometric light scattering , 2007, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[22]  P. Friedl,et al.  Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[23]  E. Hoiczyk,et al.  How Myxobacteria Glide , 2002, Current Biology.

[24]  L. Sibley How apicomplexan parasites move in and out of cells. , 2010, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[25]  A. Rigort,et al.  Structural and compositional analysis of the keratinocyte migration track. , 2003, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[26]  T. Tolker-Nielsen,et al.  The contribution of cell-cell signaling and motility to bacterial biofilm formation , 2011, MRS bulletin.

[27]  Pate Jl Gliding motility in Cytophaga. , 1985 .