The Fruits of Legitimacy: Why Some New Ventures Gain More from Innovation Than Others.

Abstract This article examines rewards to product introduction by new ventures. The authors argue that the new ventures that gain the most from innovation are those that adopt strategies that give them legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders. New ventures can gain legitimacy by creating associations with established entities; such associations can be internal or external to the firm. The authors test these ideas by examining the stock market gains of all products introduced between 1982 and 2002 by all public firms in the U.S. biotechnology industry. The results show that new ventures that acquire legitimacy externally by forming alliances with established firms gain more from their new products than new ventures that do not form such alliances. Among new ventures that do not form alliances, those that acquire legitimacy internally by creating a history of product launches or by hiring reputed executives or scientists gain more from their new products than those that do not. In relative terms, it pays more...

[1]  N. Smith,et al.  The New Marketing Myopia , 2010 .

[2]  Stefan Stremersch,et al.  Marketing of the Life Sciences: A New Framework and Research Agenda for a Nascent Field , 2009 .

[3]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Stacking the Deck: The Effect of Upper Echelon Affiliations for Entrepreneurial Firms , 2006 .

[4]  Shankar Ganesan,et al.  Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development , 2005 .

[5]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? , 2005 .

[6]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions , 2004 .

[7]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The Influence of Firms’ and Industries’ Legitimacy on the Flow of Capital into High-Technology Ventures , 2004 .

[8]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[9]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Getting Off to a Good Start: The Effects of Upper Echelon Affiliations on Underwriter Prestige , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[10]  R. Merges,et al.  The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry , 2003 .

[11]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Which ties matter when? the contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success , 2003 .

[12]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry , 2002 .

[13]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  8. Learning and Legitimacy: Entrepreneurial Responses to Constraints on the Emergence ofNew Populations and Organizations , 2002, The Entrepreneurship Dynamic.

[14]  J. Mentzer,et al.  The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance , 2002 .

[15]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[16]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels , 2002 .

[17]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[18]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Racing and Back-Pedalling into the Future: New Product Introduction and Organizational Mortality in the US Bicycle Industry, 1880-1918 , 2000 .

[20]  T. Das,et al.  Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective , 2000 .

[21]  J. Angrist.  Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models With Dummy Endogenous Regressors , 1999 .

[22]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[23]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Signaling Unobservable Product Quality through a Brand Ally , 1999 .

[24]  W. Scott,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments , 1998 .

[25]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[26]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[27]  J. Papastavrou,et al.  Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .

[28]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[29]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: the consequences of being late to the market , 1997 .

[30]  B. HendricksKevin,et al.  Delays in New Product Introductions and the Market Value of the Firm , 1997 .

[31]  M. Dacin,et al.  Isomorphism In Context: The Power And Prescription Of Institutional Norms , 1997 .

[32]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Advantages of Time-Based New Product Development in a Fast-Cycle Industry , 1997 .

[33]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[34]  R. Calantone,et al.  Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A Cross-National Comparison , 1996 .

[35]  R. Pouder,et al.  Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation , 1996 .

[36]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[37]  C. Moorman.  Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[38]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[39]  M Lunn,et al.  Applying Cox regression to competing risks. , 1995, Biometrics.

[40]  J. Mata,et al.  Life Duration of New Firms , 1994 .

[41]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[42]  T. Devinney,et al.  The Impact of New Product Introductions on the Market Value of Firms , 1993 .

[43]  S. Govindaraj,et al.  The Tylenol Incident, Ensuing Regulation, and Stock Prices , 1992, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[44]  Douglas Polley,et al.  Learning While Innovating , 1992 .

[45]  David Lindley,et al.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[46]  H. J. Arnold.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[47]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[49]  J. A. Schmitz,et al.  Imitation, Entrepreneurship, and Long-Run Growth , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[50]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies , 1985 .

[51]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[52]  Roger Hudson,et al.  Designing New Business Startups: Entrepreneurial, Organizational, and Ecological Considerations , 1984 .

[53]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[54]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[55]  E. Fama,et al.  EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK* , 1970 .

[56]  Richard M. Merelman.  Learning and Legitimacy , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[57]  Raimar Richers.  The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[58]  Satterthwaite Fe.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[59]  Lucie K. Ozanne,et al.  The Interactive Effect of Internal and External Factors on a Proactive Environmental Strategy and its Influence on a Firm's Performance , 2010 .

[60]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Stacking the Deck: The Effects of Top Management Backgrounds on Investor Decisions , 2006 .

[61]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Learning and Legitimacy: Entrepreneurial Responses to Constraints on the Emergence of New Populations , 2001 .

[62]  Michael Song,et al.  Manuscript #: RRR97-0379 THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED TECHNOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY ON JAPANESE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1999 .

[63]  M. Porter.  Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments and Institutions , 1998 .

[64]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[65]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[66]  A. Stinchcombe.  Organizations and Social Structure , 1965 .

[67]  F. E. Satterthwaite.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946, Biometrics.