论文信息 - Scatter of orthopaedic research: can orthopods stay up‐to‐date with research?

Scatter of orthopaedic research: can orthopods stay up‐to‐date with research?

The volume of orthopaedic literature is increasing exponentially, becoming more widely scattered among journals. The rate of increase in orthopaedics is greater than other specialties. We aimed to identify the number of different journals an orthopaedic surgeon would need to read to stay up‐to‐date with current evidence.

[1] Allegheny Forest Experiment Station.,et al. Purpose and procedure , 2012, Evidence Based Mental Health.

[2] I. McNamara,et al. Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[3] Ming-yueh Tsay,et al. Bibliometric analysis of the literature of randomized controlled trials. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[4] Paul Glasziou,et al. The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5] Paul Glasziou,et al. Less is more: where do the abstracts in the EBM journal come from? , 2008, Evidence-based medicine.

[6] Robert Brian Haynes,et al. Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline: a comparison of 38 published search filters. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[7] Birger Hjørland,et al. Practical potentials of Bradford's law: a critical examination of the received view , 2007, J. Documentation.

[8] K. Lee,et al. Characteristics and Trends of Orthopedic Publications between 2000 and 2009 , 2011, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[9] J A Gray. Where's the chief knowledge officer? , 1998, BMJ.