A comparative analysis of fuel cell vehicle architectures

A comparative analysis of the plug-in fuel cell vehicles (PFCV) is studied regarding different topologies, drive cycles and control strategies. To improve the performance of the PFCV, an optimization strategy is proposed at first by regulating the power distribution between the battery and the PEMFC system. Then, a direct multiple shooting (DMS) algorithm is used to solve this nonlinear programming problem (NLP) over spatial domain. In view of two topologies of the PFCV, the proposed strategy is compared with the charge-depleting charge sustaining (CDCS) strategy based on four drive cycles. Simulation results demonstrate that, for those cycles of frequent braking operations, the proposed strategy is able to reduce the hydrogen consumption as well as the on-off switching frequency of the PEMFC system. However, the CDCS strategy shows better PFCV's total efficiency than the proposed strategy for all drive cycles, and achieves a slight reduction of the hydrogen consumption for the high speed drive cycles with less braking operations.

[1]  S. Dusmez,et al.  Fuel cell and ultra-capacitor hybridization: A prototype test bench based analysis of different energy management strategies for vehicular applications , 2010 .

[2]  Dong Sun,et al.  Combined power management/design optimization for a fuel cell/battery plug-in hybrid electric vehicle using multi-objective particle swarm optimization , 2014 .

[3]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[4]  Sousso Kelouwani,et al.  Fuel cell Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle anticipatory and real-time blended-mode energy management for battery life preservation , 2013 .

[5]  Jianqiu Li,et al.  Power management and economic estimation of fuel cell hybrid vehicle using fuzzy logic , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[6]  Moritz Diehl,et al.  Real-Time Optimization for Large Scale Nonlinear Processes , 2001 .

[7]  Huei Peng,et al.  Power management and design optimization of fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicles , 2007 .

[8]  Giorgio Rizzoni,et al.  Energy management for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using equivalent consumption minimisation strategy , 2010 .

[9]  James K. Mills,et al.  Two-Stage Energy Management Control of Fuel Cell Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Considering Fuel Cell Longevity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  P. P. J. van den Bosch,et al.  Online Energy Management for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  Huei Peng,et al.  Optimal Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin's Minimum Principle , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[12]  Tony Markel,et al.  Optimizing Energy Management Strategy and Degree of Hybridization for a Hydrogen Fuel Cell SUV , 2001 .

[13]  J. Pukrushpan Modeling and control of fuel cell systems and fuel processors , 2003 .

[14]  G. Rizzoni,et al.  Effects of different PHEV control strategies on vehicle performance , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[15]  Pierluigi Pisu,et al.  A Comparative Study Of Supervisory Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  Zhihong Yu,et al.  An innovative optimal power allocation strategy for fuel cell, battery and supercapacitor hybrid electric vehicle , 2011 .

[17]  Diego Feroldi,et al.  Energy management strategies based on efficiency map for fuel cell hybrid vehicles , 2009 .