Salmonella contamination in pigs at slaughter and on the farm: a field study using an antibody ELISA test and a PCR technique.

An antibody ELISA test and a PCR method for identifying the risk of Salmonella contamination were compared in a field study on the same lots of animals in a slaughterhouse. The results were compared to investigations carried out on two farms with different prevalences of Salmonella antibody-positive animals. Salmonella antibody ELISA testing was carried out on all 383 meat juice samples derived from the diaphragm pillar muscle of each pig. Salmonella DNA analysis was performed by PCR technique on small intestine samples with lymph nodes from all 383 pigs, and on tonsils from the last 129 pigs. The 383 animals tested came from 32 different pig farms. Furthermore, the herd antibody blood serum status against Salmonella spp. of weaners was determined on two selected pig fattening farms, one with low and one with high seroprevalence in meat juice. A total of 7.0% (ELISA cut-off OD% > or =40) of the slaughtered pigs from 6 of 32 fattening farms were seropositive. Salmonella DNA was found in 16.4% of the jejunum/lymph nodes (383 animals) and in 15.5% of the tonsils (129 animals). Salmonella DNA was found in the jejunum/lymph nodes of 41% of the seropositive pigs. However, serotitres were also positive in only 17.5% of all pigs positive in the jejunum DNA test. Two farms were selected for further investigation: farm 13 (F13), with a high prevalence of seropositive pigs, 29.0%, Category II; and F11, with 9.4%, Category I. However, categorization according to the blood serum tests of the fattening pigs after on-farm testing was very different: F13 had 5% positive animals (Category I); and F11, 23.3% (Category II). The study led to the following results and recommendations: First, ELISA tests are useful for the detection of farms that are regularly contaminated with Salmonella, but such tests cannot give information on the infectious status of a single animal (or a group) at the point of slaughter. Second, it is crucial that management measures are taken to prevent the spread of infections by trade and transport: piglets should be supplied exclusively by a single, well-known producer, and finishers should be tested serologically on farm before going to slaughter. Third, ELISA tests and the PCR method are suitable for the detection of Salmonella and are recommended as analytical tools for all pork quality control programmes. Fourth, animals from suspicious farms should always be slaughtered at the end of the slaughter day, followed by thorough cleaning and disinfection.

[1]  P. Fedorka-Cray,et al.  Alternate routes of invasion may affect pathogenesis of Salmonella typhimurium in swine , 1995, Infection and immunity.

[2]  D. Baggesen,et al.  Investigation of an outbreak of human salmonellosis caused by Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica serovar Infantis by use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis. , 1996, International journal of food microbiology.

[3]  F. van Knapen,et al.  Salmonella in slaughter pigs: the effect of logistic slaughter procedures of pigs on the prevalence of Salmonella in pork. , 2001, International journal of food microbiology.

[4]  S. Biesterveld,et al.  Monitoring of transmission of Salmonella enterica serovars in pigs using bacteriological and serological detection methods. , 2001, Veterinary microbiology.

[5]  F. van Knapen,et al.  Epidemiological investigations into the sources of Salmonella contamination of pork. , 2001, Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[6]  L. Alban,et al.  The new classification system for slaughter-pig herds in the Danish Salmonella surveillance-and-control program. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  Stephen J. Fallows,et al.  White Paper on food safety , 2000 .

[8]  R H Davies,et al.  National survey for Salmonella in pigs, cattle and sheep at slaughter in Great Britain (1999–2000) , 2004, Journal of applied microbiology.

[9]  Arturo Casadevall,et al.  Host-Pathogen Interactions: Basic Concepts of Microbial Commensalism, Colonization, Infection, and Disease , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[10]  P. Fedorka-Cray,et al.  Natural transmission of Salmonella choleraesuis in swine , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  H. S. Hurd,et al.  Salmonella enterica Infections in Market Swine with and without Transport and Holding , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  F. van Knapen,et al.  Salmonella in slaughter pigs: prevalence, serotypes and critical control points during slaughter in two slaughterhouses. , 2001, International journal of food microbiology.

[13]  F. Bager,et al.  Use of Muscle Fluid as a Source of Antibodies for Serologic Detection of Salmonella Infection in Slaughter Pig Herds , 1998, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[14]  J. Korosi Statistics of Infectious Diseases , 1894 .

[15]  C. Wray,et al.  Salmonella in Domestic Animals , 2000 .

[16]  A. Rajić,et al.  Longitudinal study of Salmonella species in 90 Alberta swine finishing farms. , 2005, Veterinary microbiology.

[17]  Experience with Danish mix-ELISA in the United States , 2001 .

[18]  T. Hald,et al.  Trends and seasonal variations in the occurrence of Salmonella in pigs, pork and humans in Denmark, 1995-2000. , 2001, Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[19]  R. Isaacson,et al.  Transmission of Salmonella typhimurium to swine. , 1994, Veterinary microbiology.

[20]  E. Eveno,et al.  Development of a complete ELISA using Salmonella lipopolysaccharides of various serogroups allowing to detect all infected pigs. , 2000, Veterinary research.

[21]  K Grijspeerdt,et al.  Salmonella on pig carcasses: positive pigs and cross contamination in the slaughterhouse , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[22]  A. Altrock Results of the German Investigation in the EU-Project "Salmonella in Pork (Salinpork)": Investigations on farms , 2001 .

[23]  John E. Bennett,et al.  Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Vols 1 and 2. , 1979 .

[24]  L. Alban,et al.  The correlation between Salmonella serology and isolation of Salmonella in Danish pigs at slaughter. , 2004, Veterinary microbiology.

[25]  B. Aalbæk,et al.  Meat safety consequences of implementing visual postmortem meat inspection procedures in Danish slaughter pigs , 1997, Veterinary Record.

[26]  D. Mossel,et al.  Impact on human health of Salmonella spp. on pork in The Netherlands and the anticipated effects of some currently proposed control strategies. , 1998, International journal of food microbiology.

[27]  D. Mossel,et al.  Identification and quantification of risk factors regarding Salmonella spp. on pork carcasses. , 1997, International journal of food microbiology.

[28]  M. Tielen,et al.  Salmonella seroprevalence at the population and herd level in pigs in The Netherlands. , 2001, Veterinary microbiology.

[29]  D. Baggesen,et al.  The serological response to Salmonella serovars typhimurium and infantis in experimentally infected pigs. The time course followed with an indirect anti-LPS ELISA and bacteriological examinations. , 1995, Veterinary microbiology.

[30]  R. Davies,et al.  Distribution of salmonella on 23 pig farms in the UK , 1997 .