Spacecraft electrical power subsystem: Failure behavior, reliability, and multi-state failure analyses

Abstract This article investigates the degradation and failure behavior of spacecraft electrical power subsystem (EPS) on orbit. First, this work provides updated statistical reliability and multi-state failure analyses of spacecraft EPS and its different constituents, namely the batteries, the power distribution, and the solar arrays. The EPS is shown to suffer from infant mortality and to be a major driver of spacecraft unreliability. Over 25% of all spacecraft failures are the result of EPS failures. As a result, satellite manufacturers may wish to pursue targeted improvement to this subsystem, either through better testing or burn-in procedures, better design or parts selection, or additional redundancy. Second, this work investigates potential differences in the EPS degradation and failure behavior for spacecraft in low earth orbits (LEO) and geosynchronous orbits (GEO). This analysis was motivated by the recognition that the power/load cycles and the space environment are significantly different in LEO and GEO, and as such, they may result in different failure behavior for the EPS in these two types of orbits. The results indicate, and quantify the extent to which, the EPS fails differently in LEO and GEO, both in terms of frequency and severity of failure events. A casual summary of the findings can be stated as follows: the EPS fails less frequently but harder (with fatal consequences to the spacecraft) in LEO than in GEO.

[1]  Peter L. Biermann,et al.  Galactic cosmic rays , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Statistical reliability analysis of satellites by mass category: Does spacecraft size matter? , 2010 .

[3]  James T. Visentine,et al.  Atomic oxygen effects measurements for shuttle missions STS-8 and 41-G , 1988 .

[4]  D. B. Snyder,et al.  Array arcing in orbit - From LEO to GEO , 1999 .

[5]  Dale C. Ferguson,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Arcing in LEO and GEO Simulated Environments , 2007 .

[6]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Beyond reliability, multi-state failure analysis of satellite subsystems: A statistical approach , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[8]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Satellite Reliability: Statistical Data Analysis and Modeling , 2009 .

[9]  Subbarao Surampudi Overview of energy storage technologies for space applications , 2006 .

[10]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Satellite and satellite subsystems reliability: Statistical data analysis and modeling , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  John P. W. Stark,et al.  Spacecraft systems engineering , 1995 .

[12]  D. B. Snyder Environmentally Induced Discharges in a Solar Array , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  Ira Katz,et al.  Solar array augmented electrostatic discharge in GEO , 1998 .

[14]  J. Lawless Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data , 2002 .

[15]  Z. Svestka,et al.  A Discussion on solar studies with special reference to space observations - Solar particle events , 1971, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.