Attractiveness, attraction, and sexual selection: Evolutionary perspectives on the form and function of physical attractiveness

Publisher Summary This chapter reviews recent empirical advances that in turn explain origin of attractiveness preferences. It discusses several evolutionary models of human social behavior and their predictions regarding the function of attractiveness. It also evaluates the ability of these models to account for recent findings in the attractiveness literature. Further, the chapter examines a number of questions and implications of the applications from an evolutionary perspective. The chapter concludes by addressing the potential criticisms of an evolutionary theory of physical attractiveness. Many social scientists believe that attractiveness lies in the eye of the beholder. However, consensus, which refers to the extent to which ratings of an individual's attractiveness provided by different judges converge, is typically assessed by examining whether different people rank order the attractiveness of a particular set of targets similarly. Three types of consensus include within-culture or within-ethnic consensus, within-culture or cross-ethnic consensus, and cross-cultural or cross-ethnic agreement.

[1]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. Berry.  Vocal types and stereotypes: Joint effects of vocal attractiveness and vocal maturity on person perception , 1992 .

[3]  W. Hamilton.  Pathogens as Causes of Genetic Diversity in their Host Populations , 1982 .

[4]  S. J. Scher.  ARE ADAPTATIONS NECESSARILY GENETIC , 1999 .

[5]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Jeffry A. Simpson,et al.  Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. , 1990 .

[7]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human facial beauty , 1993, Human nature.

[8]  M. Daly,et al.  The Darwinian psychology of discriminative parental solicitude. , 1987, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[9]  H. Harpending,et al.  Father Absence and Reproductive Strategy: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1982, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[10]  C. Zalenski,et al.  Is There a Double Standard of Aging?1 , 1986 .

[11]  M. Snyder.  On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[12]  D. Buss,et al.  Preferences in human mate selection. , 1986 .

[13]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  S. Gangestad,et al.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness , 1993, Human nature.

[15]  L. Tassinary,et al.  A Critical Test of the Waist-to-Hip-Ratio Hypothesis of Female Physical Attractiveness , 1998 .

[16]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Behavior , 1994 .

[17]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[18]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Article Commentary: A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Reply to “On the Difficulty of Averaging Faces” , 1991 .

[20]  K. Dion,et al.  Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgressions. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Liking for an evaluator as a function of her physical attractiveness and nature of the evaluations , 1969 .

[22]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[24]  R. K. Young,et al.  Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships , 1995 .

[25]  D. Symons.  Evolution of human sexuality , 1979 .

[26]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .

[27]  B. Campbell.  Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[28]  J. Cross,et al.  Age, sex, race, and the perception of facial beauty. , 1971 .

[29]  Drew Westen,et al.  Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology , 1992 .

[30]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[31]  R Segre,et al.  Senescence of the voice. , 1971, Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly.

[32]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Miron Zuckerman,et al.  Cross-channel effects of vocal and physical attractiveness and their implications for interpersonal perception. , 1991 .

[34]  D. Buss.  Do women have evolved mate preferences for men with resources?: A reply to Smuts , 1991 .

[35]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Facial Aesthetics: Babies Prefer Attractiveness to Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[36]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[37]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. , 1990 .

[38]  K. A. Hildebrandt,et al.  The infant's physical attractiveness: Its effect on bonding and attachment , 1983 .

[39]  I. Munro.  A Description of Craniofacial Anomalies: The Mechanism and Rationale of Surgery , 1995 .

[40]  D. Buss.  Evolutionary personality psychology. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  Devendra Singh,et al.  Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgment of women’s attractiveness , 1995, Human nature.

[42]  D. Berry.  Beyond Beauty and After Affect: An Event Perception Approach to Perceiving Faces , 1995 .

[43]  R. J. Robertson,et al.  Offspring Quality and the Polygyny Threshold: "The Sexy Son Hypothesis" , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[44]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The direction of mothers' and daughters' preferences and the heritability of male ornaments in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) , 1993 .

[45]  J. Simpson,et al.  Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. , 1990, Journal of Personality.

[46]  K. A. Hildebrandt,et al.  Adults' responses to infants varying in perceived cuteness , 1978, Behavioural Processes.

[47]  J. Simpson,et al.  Sociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice , 1992 .

[48]  Paul R. Abramson,et al.  Sexual nature, sexual culture , 1995 .

[49]  P. Regan.  Minimum Mate Selection Standards as a Function of Perceived Mate Value, Relationship Context, and Gender , 1998 .

[50]  D. Berry,et al.  Cross-Cultural Agreement in Perceptions of Babyfaced Adults , 1987 .

[51]  S. M. Burn.  The Social Psychology of Gender , 1995 .

[52]  B. Charlesworth.  The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  J. Udry,et al.  Dominant looking male teenagers copulate earlier , 1994 .

[54]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[55]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Facial Diversity and InfantPreferences for Attractive Faces , 1991 .

[56]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  J. Thomson,et al.  Studies in perception and action V , 1999 .

[58]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Is beauty in the eye of the beholder , 1993 .

[59]  R. Thornhill,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the heritability of developmental stability , 1997 .

[60]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[61]  J Tooby,et al.  Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[62]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[63]  D. Symons.  Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. , 1995 .

[64]  E K Sadalla,et al.  Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[65]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Infants' differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces , 1990 .

[66]  Swallows and scorpionflies find symmetry is beautiful. , 1992, Science.

[67]  L. Mealey,et al.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[69]  D. Waynforth.  Differences in time use for mating and nepotistic effort as a function of male attractiveness in rural Belize , 1999 .

[70]  P. Regan.  What if You Can't Get What You Want? Willingness to Compromise Ideal Mate Selection Standards as a Function of Sex, Mate Value, and Relationship Context , 1998 .

[71]  R. May,et al.  Population Biology of Infectious Diseases , 1982, Dahlem Workshop Reports.

[72]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  R. Trivers.  Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[74]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? , 1999 .

[75]  Sarah Blaffer Hrdy.  Raising Darwin’s consciousness , 1997, Human nature.

[76]  M. Cunningham.  Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[77]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  E. Hatfield,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Mate Selection Preferences : Gender Differences Examined in a National Sample , 2004 .

[79]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[80]  D. Berry,et al.  Accuracy in Face Perception: A View from Ecological Psychology , 1993 .

[81]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? , 1987 .

[82]  P. Parsons,et al.  FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY: AN EPIGENETIC MEASURE OF STRESS , 1990, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[83]  F. Galton.  Composite Portraits, Made by Combining Those of Many Different Persons Into a Single Resultant Figure. , 1879 .

[84]  H. Pulliam.  NATURAL SELECTION AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 1982 .

[85]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments , 1990 .

[86]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Averageness, Exaggeration, and Facial Attractiveness , 1996 .

[87]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[88]  D. Berry.  Attractive Faces Are not all Created Equal: Joint Effects of Facial Babyishness and Attractiveness on Social Perception , 1991 .

[89]  Cheng-Huan Wu,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[90]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply] , 1995, Current Anthropology.

[91]  L. Zebrowitz,et al.  "Wide-Eyed" and "Crooked-Faced": Determinants of Perceived and Real Honesty Across the Life Span , 1996 .

[92]  H. Beech.  Theories of personality : primary sources and research , 1966 .

[93]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[94]  Linda A. Jackson,et al.  Physical Appearance and Gender: Sociobiological and Sociocultural Perspectives , 1992 .

[95]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolution of human sexuality. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[96]  D. Buss.  Evolutionary Psychology -- The New Science of the Mind , 1998 .

[97]  A. Feingold.  Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. , 1988 .

[98]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Newborn infants prefer attractive faces , 1998 .

[99]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  The Ant and the Peacock , 1992 .

[100]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Don't the Girls' Get Prettier at Closing Time: A Country and Western Application to Psychology , 1979 .

[101]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates , 1989 .

[102]  N. Christenfeld,et al.  Whose baby are you? , 1995, Nature.

[103]  R. A. Maier,et al.  The perceived attractiveness of preterm infants , 1984 .

[104]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[105]  C. Samuels,et al.  Aesthetic perception of faces during infancy , 1985 .

[106]  J. Simpson,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[107]  P. Gowaty.  Evolutionary biology and feminism , 1992, Human nature.

[108]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[109]  Evolution of the Psyche , 1999 .

[110]  B. I. Murstein.  Physical attractiveness and martial choice. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[111]  Frank A. Beach,et al.  Patterns of Sexual Behavior , 1951 .

[112]  Ronald Henss,et al.  Perceiving Age and Attractiveness in Facial Photographs1 , 1991 .

[113]  N. Glenn,et al.  The Utility of Education and Attractiveness for Females' Status Attainment Through Marriage. , 1976 .

[114]  Ann E. Speed,et al.  Romantic Popularity and Mate Preferences: A Peer-Nomination Study , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[115]  A. Tellegen,et al.  Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[116]  J. Langlois,et al.  Baby beautiful: adult attributions of infant competence as a function of infant attractiveness. , 1984, Child development.

[117]  Devendra Singh,et al.  Body shape and women’s attractiveness , 1993, Human nature.

[118]  John B. Nezlek,et al.  Physical attractiveness in social interaction. , 1980 .

[119]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Radiating beauty: Effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. , 1973 .

[120]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[121]  Bertram L. Smith.  Tactics in Reproduction. (Book Reviews: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems) , 1984 .

[122]  J. Langlois,et al.  Infant preferences for attractive faces: a cognitive explanation. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[123]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. , 1980 .

[124]  Toshikazu Hasegawa,et al.  Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan , 1999 .

[125]  A. Eagly,et al.  The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles , 1987 .

[126]  Susan Sprecher,et al.  Mirror, Mirror: The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life , 1985 .

[127]  D. M. Buss,et al.  Adaptive Individual Differences , 1999 .

[128]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. , 1994 .

[129]  A. Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[130]  R. Larsen,et al.  Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[131]  M B Oliver,et al.  Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[132]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human sexual selection and developmental stability. , 1997 .

[133]  S. Kalick,et al.  The Matching Hypothesis Reexamined , 1986 .

[134]  A. Mazur,et al.  Facial Dominance in Homo Sapiens as Honest Signaling of Male Quality , 1997 .

[135]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Person Perception Comes of Age: The Salience and Significance of Age in Social Judgments , 1998 .

[136]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex Differences in Jealousy in Evolutionary and Cultural Perspective: Tests From the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States , 1996 .

[137]  B. Ellis,et al.  The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. , 1992 .

[138]  D. Berry.  What can a moving face tell us? , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[139]  Steven W. Gangestad,et al.  Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences , 1993 .

[140]  Nichola. Rumsey,et al.  The Social Psychology of Facial Appearance , 1998 .

[141]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[142]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Physical Attractiveness and Peer Perception Among Children , 1974 .

[143]  P. Blumstein,et al.  Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. , 1987 .

[144]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[145]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Sex hormone metabolism in upper and lower body obesity. , 1991, International journal of obesity.

[146]  N. Cavior,et al.  Developmental aspects of judgment of physical attractiveness in children. , 1973 .

[147]  S. G. Vandenberg,et al.  Matching for Physical Attractiveness in Married Couples , 1979 .

[148]  The effects of growth and aging on facial aesthetics. , 1988 .

[149]  Joann M. Montepare,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of impressions created by age-related variations in gait , 1993 .

[150]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Evolution and Social Cognition: Contrast Effects as a Function of Sex, Dominance, and Physical Attractiveness , 1994 .

[151]  Clinical practice and the social issues of foster care , 1987 .

[152]  D. Buss.  Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status , 1998 .

[153]  D. Berry,et al.  Perceiving character in faces: the impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[154]  J. Potter,et al.  The association of body fat distribution with lifestyle and reproductive factors in a population study of postmenopausal women. , 1990, International journal of obesity.

[155]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives , 1996 .

[156]  D. Buss.  Evolutionary social psychology: Prospects and pitfalls , 1990 .

[157]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Gender Differences in Characteristics Desired in a Potential Sexual and Marriage Partner , 1997 .

[158]  L Cosmides,et al.  On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[159]  C. Keating,et al.  Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. , 1985 .

[160]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype , 1988 .

[161]  W. Barta.  Gardner Murphy's Double-Aspect Psychology , 1999 .

[162]  J. Belsky,et al.  Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: and evolutionary theory of socialization. , 1991, Child development.

[163]  R. Levant,et al.  Men and sex: New psychological perspectives. , 1997 .

[164]  M. Ryan.  Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. , 1998, Science.

[165]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Does Human Facial Attractiveness Honestly Advertise Health? Longitudinal Data on an Evolutionary Question , 1998 .

[166]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[167]  D. Kenrick.  Evolutionary Social Psychology: From Sexual Selection to Social Cognition , 1994 .

[168]  D. Berry.  Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions , 1990 .

[169]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[170]  John B. Nezlek,et al.  Physical attractiveness in social interaction: II. Why does appearance affect social experience? , 1982 .

[171]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[172]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry , 1997 .

[173]  J. Langlois.  The Origins and Functions of Appearance-Based Stereotypes: Theoretical and Applied Implications , 1995 .

[174]  Quality of early family relationships and individual differences in the timing of pubertal maturation in girls: a longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[175]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[176]  D. Buss,et al.  Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science , 1995 .

[177]  R. K. Young,et al.  Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies , 1993 .

[178]  D. Buss.  The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating , 1994 .

[179]  B. A. Gladue,et al.  Gender Differences in Perception of Attractiveness of Men and Women in Bars , 1990 .

[180]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[181]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection , 1999 .

[182]  Doug Jones,et al.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations , 1993, Human nature.

[183]  R. Larsen,et al.  Facial Attractiveness and Physical Health , 1999 .

[184]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[185]  J. Garber,et al.  Psychosocial antecedents of variation in girls' pubertal timing: maternal depression, stepfather presence, and marital and family stress. , 2000, Child development.

[186]  John B. Pittenger.  Article Commentary: On the Difficulty of Averaging Faces: Comments on Langlois and Roggman , 1991 .

[187]  D. Buss.  Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. , 1992 .