A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of Evidence-Based Medicine

The major criticisms and limitations of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) appearing in the literature over the past decade can be summarized and categorized into five recurring themes. The themes include: reliance on empiricism, narrow definition of evidence, lack of evidence of efficacy, limited usefulness for individual patients, and threats to the autonomy of the doctor/patient relationship. Analysis of EBM according to these themes leads to the conclusion that EBM can be a useful tool, but has severe drawbacks when used in isolation in the practice of individual patient care. Modern medicine must strive to balance an extremely complex set of priorities. To be an effective aid in achieving this balance, the theory and practice of EBM must expand to include new methods of study design and integration, and must adapt to the needs of both patients and the health care system in order to provide patients with the best care at the lowest cost.

[1]  David L Sackett,et al.  The arrogance of preventive medicine. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[2]  D M Chaput de Saintonge,et al.  Clinical judgment analysis. , 1990, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[3]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[5]  H. Sox,et al.  Screening Mammography for Younger Women: Back to Basics , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  Blair H. Smith,et al.  Evidence based medicine , 1996, BMJ.

[7]  A. Detsky,et al.  Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. , 1992, JAMA.

[8]  N. Abrahams,et al.  Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[9]  J. Concato,et al.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Andrew Georgiou Ba DipArts.  Data, information and knowledge: the health informatics model and its role in evidence-based medicine , 2002 .

[11]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[12]  A. Hartz,et al.  A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[14]  O Dearlove,et al.  Many questions cannot be answered by evidence based medicine , 1995, BMJ.

[15]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Evidence-based medicine , 1991 .

[16]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Data information and knowledge: the health informatics model and its role in evidence-based medicine. , 2002, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[17]  D. Sackett,et al.  The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  W. Hersh.  Medical informatics: improving health care through information. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  B. Charlton,et al.  The rise and fall of EBM. , 1998, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[20]  C David Naylor,et al.  Clinical decisions: from art to science and back again , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  V. Goel,et al.  Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care. , 2001, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[22]  Archie Cochrane.  An internal challenge to physicians' autonomy? q , 2000 .

[23]  S. Straus,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms. , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[24]  S. Sagar,et al.  No guidance is provided for situations for which evidence is lacking , 1995, BMJ.

[25]  J. Zelmer,et al.  Standardization in health informatics in Canada. , 1998, International journal of medical informatics.

[26]  G. Hill,et al.  Archie Cochrane and his legacy. An internal challenge to physicians' autonomy? , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  N. Kenny,et al.  Does good science make good medicine? Incorporating evidence into practice is complicated by the fact that clinical practice is as much art as science. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[28]  D Grahame-Smith,et al.  Evidence based medicine: Socratic dissent , 1995, BMJ.

[29]  C Melchiorri,et al.  Recent developments in the evidence-based healthcare debate. , 2001, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[30]  A E Dobbie,et al.  What evidence supports teaching evidence-based medicine? , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[31]  C. Naylor.  Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine , 1995, The Lancet.

[32]  Donald E Stanley,et al.  BMC Health Services Research BioMed Central Debate A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate , 2003 .

[33]  E Harari,et al.  Whose Evidence? Lessons from the Philosophy of Science and the Epistemology of Medicine , 2001, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[34]  R. Haynes,et al.  What kind of evidence is it that Evidence-Based Medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? , 2002, BMC health services research.