Time–temperature equivalence in the tack and dynamic stiffness of polymer prepreg and its application to automated composites manufacturing

A recently developed peel test designed to simulate the automated tape lay-up (ATL) process was used to measure tack and dynamic stiffness of newly developed ATL prepregs. Resin was extracted from the prepreg process before impregnation of the fibres. Isothermal small amplitude frequency sweeps were carried out in shear rheology to determine time–temperature superposition parameters in the form of Williams–Landel–Ferry equation. Gel permeation chromatography and differential scanning calorimetry demonstrated that the resin was not significantly changed during the prepregging process. The WLF parameters were used to transpose isothermal tack and dynamic stiffness results with excellent agreement found. This relationship offers manufacturers using composite prepreg a method to maximise and maintain tack levels at different feed rates by appropriate changes in temperature. This is of significant importance in improving the reliability of automated composite lay-up processes such as AFP and ATL, whose feed rate must vary to accommodate lay-up operations.

[1]  A. Béakou,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Prepreg Tack , 2010 .

[2]  C. J. Knill,et al.  The Elements of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd ed.: A. Rudin; Academic Press, San Diego, 1999, xvii+509 pages, ISBN 0-12-601685-2, US$65.00 , 2000 .

[3]  A. Rudin.  The elements of polymer science and engineering , 1982 .

[4]  P. Tordjeman,et al.  Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 2. The interfacial fracture domains , 1998 .

[5]  Nicholas A. Warrior,et al.  The experimental determination of prepreg tack and dynamic stiffness , 2012 .

[6]  M. Huggins.  Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. , 1961 .

[7]  J. Seferis,et al.  Prepreg process analysis , 1993 .

[8]  Weijian Xu,et al.  Atomistic molecular modelling of crosslinked epoxy resin , 2006 .

[9]  K. J. Saunders.  Organic Polymer Chemistry , 1973 .

[10]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Fabrication process of open surfaces by robotic fibre placement , 2004 .

[11]  J. Seferis,et al.  Analysis and characterization of prepreg tack , 1992 .

[12]  M. Akay.  Effects of prepreg ageing and post-cure hygrothermal conditioning on the mechanical behaviour of carbon-fibre/epoxy laminates , 1990 .

[13]  The Mechanics of Prepreg Conformance , 1988 .

[14]  Nicholas A. Warrior,et al.  Experimental determination and control of prepreg tack for automated manufacture , 2011 .

[15]  K Khodabandehloo,et al.  The automated manufacture of prepreg broadgoods components — a review of literature , 1996 .

[16]  S. John,et al.  Development of a new structural prepreg: characterisation of handling, drape and tack properties , 2004 .

[17]  John J. Craig,et al.  Automated composite tape lay-up using robotic devices , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  J. Seferis,et al.  Prepreg process-structure-property analoysis and scale-up for manufacturing and performance , 1996 .

[19]  V. Harmandaris,et al.  Properties of Benzene Confined between Two Au(111) Surfaces Using a Combined Density Functional Theory and Classical Molecular Dynamics Approach , 2011 .

[20]  F. Boey,et al.  Microwave curing of epoxy-amine system — effect of curing agent on the rate enhancement , 1999 .

[21]  D. Rosu,et al.  Cure kinetics of epoxy resins studied by non-isothermal DSC data , 2002 .

[22]  P. Tordjeman,et al.  Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 1. Cohesive fracture , 1997 .

[23]  A. Allal,et al.  Effect of the rheological properties of industrial hot-melt and pressure-sensitive adhesives on the peel behavior , 1999 .