Evaluating the implementation and use of the regional cancer plan in Western Sweden through concept mapping.

Quality problem or issue Within healthcare, policy documents are often used to strategically standardize, streamline or change how general health issues are managed for a specific patient group or treatment. Despite significant effort in developing policy and strategic planning documents, these may not have the intended impact and their value has long been questioned by practitioners. Choice of solution To identify barriers and affordances for the implementation and use of a strategic plan for cancer care in the Western Sweden Healthcare Region, we used Concept Mapping; a participatory mixed method approach to inquiry consisting of both qualitative and quantitative tasks intended to elicit and integrate the diverse perspectives of multiple stakeholders. Implementation The study was carried out between April and October 2017 and consisted of several sequential data collection steps: idea generation, sorting and rating ideas for importance and feasibility. Stakeholders from different levels and professions in cancercare participated, but the number varied in the separate steps of data collection: idea generation (n = 112), sorting (n = 16) and rating (n = 38). Evaluation A concept map visualized seven areas that stakeholders throughout the cancer-care process considered necessary to address in order to enable the implementation of the plan. Skills provision was considered the most important cluster but also rated as least feasible. A consistent theme emerged that information, or lack thereof, might be a barrier for the plan being put into action to a greater extent in the cancer-care units. Nine actionable ideas rated highly on both importance and feasibility were presented as a go-zone. Lessons learned Our results suggest that efforts might be better spent on ensuring information about and accessibility to strategic documents throughout the organization, rather than frequently updating them or producing new ones. Having sufficient skills provision seems to be the prerequisite for successful implementation.

[1]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. , 1989 .

[2]  L. Windsor Using Concept Mapping in Community-Based Participatory Research , 2013, Journal of mixed methods research.

[3]  Gregory A. Aarons,et al.  A Concept Mapping Approach to Guide and Understand Dissemination and Implementation , 2012, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

[4]  Heini Ikävalko,et al.  Implementing strategies successfully , 2002 .

[5]  A. Nathens,et al.  Community-based participatory research: development of an emergency department-based youth violence intervention using concept mapping. , 2010, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  G. Aarons,et al.  A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[7]  Sejal Patel,et al.  Letting youths choose for themselves: concept mapping as a participatory approach for program and service planning. , 2015, Family & community health.

[8]  Danielle R Adams,et al.  A Multi-Level Examination of Stakeholder Perspectives of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Large Urban Publicly-Funded Mental Health System , 2016, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[9]  William M Trochim,et al.  Hindsight is 20/20: Reflections on the evolution of concept mapping. , 2017, Evaluation and program planning.

[10]  Mary Kane,et al.  Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation , 2006 .

[11]  Philip Berke,et al.  What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand , 2006 .

[12]  Leonard A. Jason,et al.  Handbook of Methodological Approaches to Community-Based Research: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods , 2015 .

[13]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[14]  Lawrence A Palinkas,et al.  Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: a multiple stakeholder analysis. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[15]  K. A. Sturrock,et al.  A Multidimensional Scaling Stress Evaluation Table , 2000 .

[16]  A. Gielen,et al.  An Introduction to Concept Mapping as a Participatory Public Health Research Method , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[17]  Mary Kane,et al.  Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. , 2012, Evaluation and program planning.

[18]  Stephen E. Marcus,et al.  The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives , 2008 .

[19]  Rinad S. Beidas,et al.  Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies , 2017, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.