Random channel coding and blind deconvolution

Blind deconvolution arises naturally when dealing with finite multipath interference on a signal. In this paper we present a new method to protect the signals from the effects of sparse multipath channels — we modulate/encode the signal using random waveforms before transmission and estimate the channel and signal from the observations, without any prior knowledge of the channel other than that it is sparse. The problem can be articulated as follows. The original message x is encoded with an overdetermined m × n (m > n) matrix A whose entries are randomly chosen; the encoded message is given by Ax. The received signal is the convolution of the encoded message with h, the S-sparse impulse response of the channel. We explore three different schemes to recover the message x and the channel h simultaneously. The first scheme recasts the problem as a block l1 optimization program. The second scheme imposes a rank-1 structure on the estimated signal. The third scheme uses nuclear norm as a proxy for rank, to recover the x and h. The simulation results are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the random coding and proposed recovery schemes.

[1]  Shiqian Ma,et al.  Fixed point and Bregman iterative methods for matrix rank minimization , 2009, Math. Program..

[2]  J. Romberg,et al.  Sparse channel separation using random probes , 2010, 1002.4222.

[3]  Volkan Cevher,et al.  Model-Based Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Pablo A. Parrilo,et al.  Guaranteed Minimum-Rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Nuclear Norm Minimization , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Channel protection: Random coding meets sparse channels , 2009, 2009 IEEE Information Theory Workshop.

[6]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  On the Reconstruction of Block-Sparse Signals With an Optimal Number of Measurements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Highly Robust Error Correction byConvex Programming , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  E. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[12]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Total variation blind deconvolution , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  Hui Liu,et al.  Recent developments in blind channel equalization: From cyclostationarity to subspaces , 1996, Signal Process..

[16]  Lang Tong,et al.  Blind identification and equalization based on second-order statistics: a time domain approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  M. Bellanger Adaptive filter theory: by Simon Haykin, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4LB, Canada, in: Prentice-Hall Information and System Sciences Series, published by Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632, U.S.A., 1986, xvii+590 pp., ISBN 0-13-004052-5 025 , 1987 .

[18]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[19]  G. Golub Matrix computations , 1983 .