Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). Recently DEA has been extended to examine the efficiency of two-stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are intermediate measures that make up the inputs to the second stage. The resulting two-stage DEA model provides not only an overall efficiency score for the entire process, but as well yields an efficiency score for each of the individual stages. Due to the existence of intermediate measures, the usual procedure of adjusting the inputs or outputs by the efficiency scores, as in the standard DEA approach, does not necessarily yield a frontier projection. The current paper develops an approach for determining the frontier points for inefficient DMUs within the framework of two-stage DEA.

[1]  Herbert F. Lewis,et al.  Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball , 2003 .

[2]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[3]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  R. Färe,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS: A FRONTIER APPROACH , 1995 .

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[7]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  R. Matousek,et al.  Efficiency of Turkish banking: Two-stage network system. Variable returns to scale model , 2011 .

[9]  Chin-Wei Huang,et al.  Assessment of China transit and economic efficiencies in a modified value-chains DEA model , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Parag C. Pendharkar,et al.  Application of Bayesian Network Classifiers and Data Envelopment Analysis for Mining Breast Cancer Patterns , 2000 .

[11]  R. Färe,et al.  Slacks and congestion: a comment , 2000 .

[12]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Parag C. Pendharkar,et al.  The relationship between software development team size and software development cost , 2009, CACM.

[14]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[15]  Rolf Färe,et al.  AN INTERMEDIATE INPUT MODEL OF DAIRY PRODUCTION USING COMPLEX SURVEY DATA , 1995 .

[16]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Walter Ukovich,et al.  A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..