Uncertainty Analysis for Seismic Hazard in the Southern Illinois Basin

We investigate the uncertainty of estimated peak ground acceleration (PGA), 0.2 s spectral acceleration (Sa), and 1.0 s Sa to different input variables for the southern Illinois basin (SIB) using the model and computer codes of the 1996 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard maps of Frankel et al. (1997b). The uncertainties associated with incomplete knowledge are assessed using a Monte Carlo approach to sample a logic tree. The logic tree is made of input-variable branch points representing alternative values for each parameter. This study is the first whole-map uncertainty analysis for the smoothed-seismicity method on which much of the central and eastern U.S. National Seismic Hazard maps are based. The uniqueness of the approach used is the assessment of individual branch-point sensitivity on the uncertainty in the seismic hazard calculations, in addition to overall uncertainty. The mean 2%-probability-of-exceedence-in-50-year PGA, 0.2 s Sa, and 1.0 s Sa hazard maps from the logic tree are similar to the corresponding maps of Frankel et al. (1997b). Overall, the coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by the mean for each grid point) in these maps varies between 0.2 and 0.7. The most sensitive branch point of the SIB logic tree is for the lower-magnitude limit of the catalog used in calculating seismic hazard. It is followed closely in importance by the branch points representing uncertainty in activity rate and the choice of ground-motion attenuation relation. Results suggest that the greatest reduction in uncertainty in seismic hazard calculations for the SIB could be achieved by continued research in the areas of (1) eastern U.S. earthquake monitoring (to extend the short instrumental catalog of earthquakes), (2) studies leading to paleoseismic information (to extend the historical catalog for large events), and (3) strong ground-motion studies.

[1]  C. Cramer,et al.  Updated Seismic Hazard in the Southern Illinois Basin: Geological and Geophysical Foundations for Use in the 2002 USGS National Seismic-hazard Maps , 2002 .

[2]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[3]  Anna H. Olsen,et al.  Seismic-Hazard Maps for the Conterminous United States , 1997 .

[4]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[5]  David D. Jackson,et al.  Seismic hazards in southern California: probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024 , 1996 .

[6]  O. Nuttli,et al.  The Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811 and 1812: Intesities, ground motion and magnitudes , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  A. Johnston Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—III. New Madrid 1811–1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755 , 1996 .

[8]  T. Toppozada,et al.  Re-evaluation of the 1836 “Hayward fault” and the 1838 San Andreas fault earthquakes , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  C. Cramer The New Madrid Seismic Zone: Capturing Variability in Seismic Hazard Analyses , 2001 .

[10]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-motion relations for eastern North America , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  C. R. Allen,et al.  Relationship between seismicity and geologic structure in the Southern California region , 1965 .

[12]  Mark D. Petersen,et al.  A Monte Carlo approach in estimating uncertainty for a seismic hazard assessment of Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange counties, California , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  G. R. Toro,et al.  Model of Strong Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best Estimates and Uncertainties , 1997 .

[14]  P. Talwani,et al.  Recurrence rates of large earthquakes in the South Carolina Coastal Plain based on paleoliquefaction data , 2001 .

[15]  S. Hough,et al.  On the modified Mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811/1812 New Madrid, central United States, earthquakes , 1999 .

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[17]  L. Reiter Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights , 1991 .

[18]  Robin K. McGuire FRISK: computer program for seismic risk analysis using faults as earthquake sources , 1978 .

[19]  A. Frankel Mapping Seismic Hazard in the Central and Eastern United States , 1995 .

[20]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Some Comparisons Between Recent Ground- Motion Relations , 1997 .

[21]  Chris H. Cramer,et al.  A seismic hazard uncertainty analysis for the New Madrid seismic zone , 2001 .

[22]  E. Fielding,et al.  The 26 January 2001 “Republic Day” Earthquake, India , 2001 .

[23]  A. Frankel,et al.  Geology in the 1996 USGS Seismic-hazard Maps, Central and Eastern United States , 2000 .