Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space

Growing evidence suggests that orienting visual attention in space can influence the processing of numerical magnitude, with leftward orienting speeding up the processing of small numbers relative to larger ones and the converse for rightward orienting. The manipulation of eye movements is a convenient way to direct visuospatial attention, but several aspects of the complex relationship between eye movements, attention orienting and number processing remain unexplored. In a previous study, we observed that inducing involuntary, reflexive eye movements by means of optokinetic stimulation affected number processing only when numerical magnitude was task relevant (i.e., during magnitude comparison, but not during parity judgment; Ranzini et al., in J Cogn Psychol 27, 459–470, (2015). Here, we investigated whether processing of task-irrelevant numerical magnitude can be modulated by voluntary eye movements, and whether the type of eye movements (smooth pursuit vs. saccades) would influence this interaction. Participants tracked with their gaze a dot while listening to a digit. The numerical task was to indicate whether the digit was odd or even through non-spatial, verbal responses. The dot could move leftward or rightward either continuously, allowing tracking by smooth pursuit eye movements, or in discrete steps across a series of adjacent locations, triggering a sequence of saccades. Both smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements similarly affected number processing and modulated response times for large numbers as a function of direction of motion. These findings suggest that voluntary eye movements redirect attention in mental number space and highlight that eye movements should play a key factor in the investigation of number–space interactions.

[1]  F. Mast,et al.  Counting is a spatial process: evidence from eye movements , 2016, Psychological research.

[2]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Target Selection for Pursuit and Saccadic Eye Movements in Humans , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Processing of Representational Space in Neglect: Dissociations in Accessing the Mental Number Line , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Ocular drift along the mental number line , 2016, Psychological Research.

[5]  Visual attention and processing in the elderly driver , 2010 .

[6]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Eye position predicts what number you have in mind , 2010, Current Biology.

[7]  F. Mast,et al.  Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: evidence from eye movements on a blank screen , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[8]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases , 2001, Neurology.

[9]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  The Cultural Number Line: A Review of Cultural and Linguistic Influences on the Development of Number Processing , 2011 .

[10]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[13]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Eye Gaze Reveals a Fast, Parallel Extraction of the Syntax of Arithmetic Formulas , 2022 .

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Xinlin Zhou,et al.  Dynamic mental number line in simple arithmetic , 2016, Psychological research.

[20]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Interactions between perceptual and numerical space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Richard J Krauzlis,et al.  Primacy of spatial information in guiding target selection for pursuit and saccades. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[23]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[24]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Looking for the answer: The mind's eye in number space , 2008, Neuroscience.

[25]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Neglect Impairs Explicit Processing of the Mental Number Line , 2022 .

[26]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[29]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Eye Movements and Problem Solving , 2003, Psychological science.

[31]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[32]  Fabrizio Doricchi,et al.  No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Paying Attention through Eye Movements: A Computational Investigation of the Premotor Theory of Spatial Attention , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Stephen G. Lisberger,et al.  Regulation of the gain of visually guided smooth-pursuit eye movements by frontal cortex , 2001, Nature.

[35]  K. Priftis,et al.  Optokinetic Stimulation Modulates Neglect for the Number Space: Evidence from Mental Number Interval Bisection , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  G. Antonucci,et al.  Effect of Optokinetic Stimulation in Patients with Visual Neglect , 1990, Cortex.

[37]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Visuomotor Origins of Covert Spatial Attention , 2003, Neuron.

[38]  Wim Fias,et al.  Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[39]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Role of arcuate frontal cortex of monkeys in smooth pursuit eye movements. I. Basic response properties to retinal image motion and position. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Susana Ruiz Fernández,et al.  Number magnitude determines gaze direction: Spatial–numerical association in a free-choice task , 2011, Cortex.

[41]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[43]  Wim Fias,et al.  Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[45]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[47]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  R. Krauzlis Recasting the smooth pursuit eye movement system. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  K. Priftis,et al.  Larger, smaller, odd or even? Task-specific effects of optokinetic stimulation on the mental number space , 2015 .

[53]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  When Digits Help Digits: Spatial–Numerical Associations Point to Finger Counting as Prime Example of Embodied Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[54]  M. Hartmann Numbers in the eye of the beholder: What do eye movements reveal about numerical cognition? , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[55]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[58]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[59]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[60]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Different Effects of Numerical Magnitude on Visual and Proprioceptive Reference Frames , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[61]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: eye movements to absent objects , 2001, Psychological research.

[62]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Eye position effects in monkey cortex. II. Pursuit- and fixation-related activity in posterior parietal areas LIP and 7A. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[64]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Graspable Objects Shape Number Processing , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[65]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Attentional Bias Induced by Solving Simple and Complex Addition and Subtraction Problems , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[67]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[68]  R J Krauzlis,et al.  Activation and inactivation of rostral superior colliculus neurons during smooth-pursuit eye movements in monkeys. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task , 2009, Cognition.

[70]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Influence of gaze observation on random number generation. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[71]  R. Rafal,et al.  Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[72]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[73]  C. Semenza,et al.  The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[74]  E. J. Morris,et al.  Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[75]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Creating number semantics through finger movement perception , 2010, Cognition.

[76]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[77]  Wim Gevers,et al.  Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[78]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways) , 2008, Cognition.

[79]  F A Miles,et al.  Release of fixation for pursuit and saccades in humans: evidence for shared inputs acting on different neural substrates. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.