A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TWO COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE WORK SYSTEMS FOR SUPPORTING COLLABORATIVE BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING ACTIVITIES

In this study, a comparative evaluation of different Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW) environments was conducted to reveal their constraints and affordances for supporting synchronous collaborative business process modeling (cBPM) activities online. For this purpose, two case studies were carried out with two CSCW systems that differ in terms of their interaction design features for supporting joint work. The dual-eye tracking method was employed to monitor how the participants focused their attention on the shared workspace during cBPM tasks. An interaction analysis was performed on the communicational content exchanged by the participants in chat messages and activities performed on the shared working area in light of the coordination, communication, awareness, group decision-making and team-building aspects of collaboration. The interaction analysis suggested that the design of the systems significantly affected the participants’ performance and the interaction quality throughout cBPM. In addition, a content analysis was conducted to determine the effects of different interaction design methodologies on the formation of the Business Process Modeling (BP Modeling) phases namely elicitation, formalization, validation and verification. The interaction design features of the systems were found to significantly affect the organization of the BP Modeling phases. Based on the findings, some design suggestions were made to enhance the efficiency of collaboration in cBPM practices. It is expected that the results of the study will serve as a guideline for system designers in designing an effective synchronous cBPM tool, and for end users in choosing a system for their synchronous cBPM practices.

[1]  Barbara Weber,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Collaborative Process of Process Modeling , 2013, CAiSE Forum.

[2]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  CSCW: Four Characters in Search of a Context , 1989, ECSCW.

[3]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Martin Wessner,et al.  Shared referencing of mathematical objects in online chat , 2006 .

[5]  Alan Zemel.  Texts-in-interaction: collaborative problem-solving in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication , 2005, CSCL.

[6]  Peter Rittgen,et al.  Success Factors of e-Collaboration in Business Process Modeling , 2010, CAiSE.

[7]  Robin Bergenthum,et al.  An approach to business process modelling emphasizing the early design phases , 2009 .

[8]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  A Multidimensional Coding Scheme for VMT , 2009 .

[9]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[10]  Peter Fettke,et al.  Collaborative Business Process Modeling with CoMoMod - A Toolkit for Model Integration in Distributed Cooperation Environments , 2011, 2011 IEEE 20th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[11]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Studying Virtual Math Teams , 2010 .

[12]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication , 1999 .

[13]  Charles Teddlie,et al.  Mixed Methods Sampling A Typology With Examples , 2016 .

[14]  Pierre N. Robillard,et al.  The social side of software engineering - A real ad hoc collaboration network , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[16]  Markus Nüttgens,et al.  Eye Tracking Experiments in Business Process Modeling: Agenda Setting and Proof of Concept , 2011, EMISA.

[17]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Collaborative process modelling - tool analysis and design implications , 2011, ECIS.

[18]  Stephan Roser,et al.  A categorization of collaborative business process modeling techniques , 2005, Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology Workshops.

[19]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  A Fundamental View on the Process of Conceptual Modeling , 2005, ER.

[20]  Theo P. van der Weide,et al.  Information modeling: The process and the required competencies of its participants , 2004, Data Knowl. Eng..

[21]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Collaboration Features in current BPM Tools , 2012, EMISA Forum.

[22]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[23]  Barbara Weber,et al.  Investigating the Process of Process Modeling with Eye Movement Analysis , 2012, Business Process Management Workshops.

[24]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures , 2007 .

[25]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Eye-Tracking the Factors of Process Model Comprehension Tasks , 2013, CAiSE.

[26]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  What's in the mix? Combining coding and conversation analysis to investigate chat-based problem solving , 2007 .