Who Gets Involved in Collective Action?: Social Psychological Determinants of Individual Participation in Trade Unions

This study examined social psychological factors associated with willingness to participate in collective action. These factors were group identification, collectivist orientation, outgroup stereotyping, perceived intergroup conflict, egoistic and collective relative deprivation, and political efficacy. Three hundred and fifty members of a trade union completed questionnaires where items measured these factors along with their prospective participation in a range of union activities. Regression analyses indicated that the most significant correlate of participation was the strength of the respondent's sense of group identification. Other significant correlates were collectivist orientation and the degree to which the outgroup (management) was perceived in a stereotypical fashion. Further analyses were undertaken to examine the possible moderating effect of group identification on the relationships between independent and dependent variables. These indicated a broadly similar pattern of results for both strong and weak group identifiers though collective relative deprivation appeared to be somewhat more important for strong identifiers and political efficacy somewhat more important for weak identifiers. These findings are discussed in the context of research into social identity and collective action in other settings.

[1]  Rupert Brown,et al.  From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. , 1995 .

[2]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. , 1991 .

[3]  C. Kelly.  Social Identity and Intergroup Perceptions in Minority-Majority Contexts , 1990 .

[4]  M. Gordon,et al.  DUAL ALLEGIANCE: RENEWAL, RECONSIDERATION, AND RECANTATION , 1990 .

[5]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .

[6]  C. Kelly.  Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity , 1989 .

[7]  M. Laffin.  Managing under Pressure: Industrial Relations in Local Government , 1989 .

[8]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  Collectivism-Individualism in Everyday Social Life: The Middle Kingdom and the Melting Pot , 1989 .

[9]  J. Schofield,et al.  Issue Salience, Perceived Efficacy and Perceived Risk: A Study of the Origins of Anti-Nuclear War Activity , 1989 .

[10]  J. Schofield,et al.  Fallout From The Day After. The Impact of a TV Film on Attitudes Related to Nuclear War1 , 1989 .

[11]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Intergroup aggression: its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  F. Crosby,et al.  Affirmative action in perspective , 1989 .

[13]  F. Tougas.  Who Likes Affirmative Action: Attitudinal Processes Among Men and Women , 1989 .

[14]  C. Kelly.  Intergroup differentiation in a political context , 1988 .

[15]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[16]  F. Tougas.  The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach. , 1988 .

[17]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups , 1988 .

[18]  M. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories , 1987 .

[19]  Thomas A. Knox,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: Accounting for Variability in Attitudes and Cognitive/Affective Reactions Toward the Threat of Nuclear War1 , 1987 .

[20]  L. Mann,et al.  Unemployment, Relative Deprivation, and Social Protest , 1987 .

[21]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Disadvantaged group responses to perceived inequality: from passive acceptance to collective action , 1987 .

[22]  S. Fiske,et al.  People's reactions to nuclear war. Implications for psychologists. , 1987, The American psychologist.

[23]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization , 1986 .

[24]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters , 1986 .

[25]  Steven Mcshane.  The multidimensionality of union participation , 1986 .

[26]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Protection Motivation Theory: Prediction of Intentions to Engage in Anti‐Nuclear War Behaviors1 , 1986 .

[27]  Antinuclear Activism, Psychic Numbing, and Mental Health , 1986 .

[28]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance , 1986 .

[29]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[30]  S. Wilkinson.  Feminist social psychology : developing theory and practice , 1986 .

[31]  G. Stephenson,et al.  The Relationship of Inter‐group Understanding and Inter‐party Friction in Industry , 1985 .

[32]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[33]  D. A. Wilder,et al.  Empirical contributions: Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization , 1984 .

[34]  A. Knippenberg,et al.  Social identity and equity concerns in intergroup perceptions , 1984 .

[35]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique , 1984 .

[36]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  MOBILIZATION AND PARTICIPATION: SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPANSIONS OF RESOURCE MOBILIZATION THEORY* , 1984 .

[37]  P. Brickman,et al.  Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action ☆ , 1984 .

[38]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Identification: The Same Thing to All People? , 1984 .

[39]  P. G. Klandermans.  Mobilization and participation in trade union action: an expectancy - value approach , 1984 .

[40]  R. J. Brown.  The effects of intergroup similarity and cooperative vs. competitive orientation on intergroup discrimination , 1984 .

[41]  G. Stephenson,et al.  INTER‐GROUP UNDERSTANDING AND SIZE OF ORGANISATION , 1983 .

[42]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Threat of Nuclear War: Risk Interpretation and Behavioral Response , 1983 .

[43]  Serge Guimond,et al.  Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition–emotion distinction and the personal–group deprivation issue. , 1983 .

[44]  M. Gordon,et al.  Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and an Examination of Its Correlates , 1980 .

[45]  E. Krausz,et al.  Group Conflict and Cooperation: Their Social Psychology , 1968 .

[46]  R. Gorsuch,et al.  Beliefs, attitudes, and values , 1968 .