Accuracy of the Bernoulli Equation for Estimation of Pressure Gradient Across Stenotic Blalock–Taussig Shunts: An In Vitro and Numerical Study

Abstract. Accurate assessment of the pressure gradient (PG) across a modified Blalock–Taussig (mBT) shunt is important in planning for staging to a cavopulmonary anastomosis for many patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease. The mBT shunt Doppler velocity has been used in the simplified echo Bernoulli equation to predict this PG with variable results. The purpose of this investigation is to provide analysis of the flow dynamics through stenotic mBT shunts and to assess the accuracy of Doppler techniques in determining PGs and the presence and location of stenosis. Three-dimensional models of mBT shunts were created, with and without stenosis. In vitro and computational fluid dynamic flow experiments were carried out. In vitro experiments demonstrated that the Doppler-measured PG underestimated catheter-measured PG in the mBT shunt with diffuse stenosis. In nonstenotic mBT and those that had outlet and inlet stenosis, the Doppler-measured PG showed underestimation of catheter PG at low PG and generally improved estimation at higher PG. In the mBT shunt model with inlet stenosis, there was slight overestimation at higher PG. Numerical simulations provide an ``observation window'' into events occurring in and around mBT shunts showing that the hemodynamics vary significantly. Changing hemodynamic processes are at work through stenotic mBT shunts causing variations in overestimation and underestimation of catheter-measured PG using the simplified echo Bernoulli equation. Our results have relevance to the assessment of patients with mBT shunts, helping to explain some of the discrepancies that investigators have found in the past.

[1]  R. Levine,et al.  Pressure recovery distal to stenoses: expanding clinical applications of engineering principles. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  G. Marx,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic estimation of systolic pulmonary artery pressure in patients with aortic-pulmonary shunts. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  GeraldMaurer,et al.  Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound , 1996 .

[4]  K. Karsch,et al.  Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  F. Macartney,et al.  Modified Blalock-Taussig shunt. Use of subclavian artery orifice as flow regulator in prosthetic systemic-pulmonary artery shunts. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  R. Shandas,et al.  Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: a numerical study. , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  T. Tacy,et al.  In vitro Doppler assessment of pressure gradients across modified Blalock-Taussig shunts. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  P. Vandervoort,et al.  Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. , 1995, Circulation.

[9]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. , 1996, Circulation.

[10]  S. Goldberg,et al.  A two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic method for calculation of pulmonary and systemic blood flow in a canine model with a variable-sized left-to-right extracardiac shunt. , 1983, Circulation.

[11]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  H. Taussig,et al.  The Surgical Treatment of Malformations of the Heart: In Which There Is Pulmonary Stenosis or Pulmonary Atresia , 1945 .

[13]  A. J. Ward Smith,et al.  Pressure losses in ducted flows , 1971 .

[14]  M. Vanauker,et al.  Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis. The role of the Reynolds number. , 1996, Circulation.

[15]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Spatial velocity distribution and acceleration in serial subvalve tunnel and valvular obstructions: an in vitro study using Doppler color flow mapping. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  A. D. Young,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1968 .

[17]  A. Weyman,et al.  Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient "overestimation" by Doppler echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  J. Seward,et al.  Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Continuous-Wave Doppler Velocities and Gradients Across Fixed Tunnel Obstructions: Studies In Vitro and In Vivo , 1988 .