Consideration of Scale in Remote Sensing of Biodiversity

A coherent and effective remote sensing (RS) contribution to biodiversity monitoring requires careful consideration of scale in all its dimensions, including spatial, temporal, spectral, and angular, along with biodiversity at different levels of biological organization. Recent studies of the relationship between optical diversity (spectral diversity) and biodiversity reveal a scale dependence that can be influenced by the RS methods used, vegetation type, and degree and nature of disturbance. To better understand these issues, we call for multi-scale field campaigns that test the effect of sampling scale, vegetation type, and degree of disturbance on the ability to detect different kinds of biodiversity, along with the development of improved models that incorporate both physical and biological principles as well as ecological and evolutionary theory. One goal of these studies would be to more closely match instrumentation and sampling scales to biological definitions of biodiversity and so improve optical diversity (spectral diversity) as a proxy for biodiversity. The ultimate goal would be to design and implement a truly effective, “scale-aware” global biodiversity monitoring system employing RS methods. Such a system could improve our understanding of the distribution and functional importance of biodiversity and enhance our ability to manage ecosystems for resilience and sustainability in a changing world.

[1]  R. Whittaker Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[2]  H. Nagendra,et al.  Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: Assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats , 2013 .

[3]  S. Franklin,et al.  Deciduous tree species classification using object-based analysis and machine learning with unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral data , 2018 .

[4]  E. H. Simpson Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[5]  K. Meissner,et al.  How Essential Biodiversity Variables and remote sensing can help national biodiversity monitoring , 2017 .

[6]  C. Hostetler,et al.  Spatial scales of optical variability in the coastal ocean: Implications for remote sensing and in situ sampling , 2016 .

[7]  K. Dahlin Spectral diversity area relationships for assessing biodiversity in a wildland-agriculture matrix. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  Norman A. Bourg,et al.  CTFS‐ForestGEO: a worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change , 2015, Global change biology.

[9]  P. Curran The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction , 1988 .

[10]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change , 2012, Nature.

[11]  C. Marshall,et al.  Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? , 2011, Nature.

[12]  Mahta Moghaddam,et al.  Remote sensing in BOREAS: Lessons learned , 2004 .

[13]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Interannual Variability in Dry Mixed-Grass Prairie Yield: A Comparison of MODIS, SPOT, and Field Measurements , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[14]  C. Justice,et al.  Validating MODIS Terrestrial Ecology Products: Linking In Situ and Satellite Measurements , 1999 .

[15]  T. Painter,et al.  Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing - definitions and case studies , 2006 .

[16]  James A. Goodman,et al.  Classification of benthic composition in a coral reef environment using spectral unmixing , 2007 .

[17]  Fausto W. Acerbi-Junior,et al.  Scaling dimensions in spectroscopy of soil and vegetation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[18]  Stefano Bocchi,et al.  Fine-scale assessment of hay meadow productivity and plant diversity in the European Alps using field spectrometric data , 2010 .

[19]  Brian R. Johnson,et al.  NEON: the first continental-scale ecological observatory with airborne remote sensing of vegetation canopy biochemistry and structure , 2010 .

[20]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Leaf aging of Amazonian canopy trees as revealed by spectral and physiochemical measurements. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[21]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Organismic-Scale Remote Sensing of Canopy Foliar Traits in Lowland Tropical Forests , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[22]  J. Kerr,et al.  Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  P. Soranno,et al.  Macrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales , 2014 .

[24]  D. Rocchini,et al.  Does using species abundance data improve estimates of species diversity from remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity , 2010 .

[25]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Reviews and Syntheses: optical sampling of the flux tower footprint , 2015 .

[26]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Disentangling the contribution of biological and physical properties of leaves and canopies in imaging spectroscopy data , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  P. Gong,et al.  Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of Panama , 2004 .

[29]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Mapping tree species diversity of a tropical montane forest by unsupervised clustering of airborne imaging spectroscopy data , 2016 .

[31]  Tarin Paz-Kagan,et al.  Multiscale mapping of species diversity under changed land use using imaging spectroscopy. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[32]  J. Féret,et al.  Mapping tropical forest canopy diversity using high‐fidelity imaging spectroscopy. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion , 2012 .

[34]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Landscape complexity and spatial scale influence the relationship between remotely sensed spectral diversity and survey-based plant species richness , 2011 .

[35]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Predicting across scales: Theory development and testing , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  Harnessing plant spectra to integrate the biodiversity sciences across biological and spatial scales. , 2017, American journal of botany.

[37]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[38]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Quantifying forest canopy traits: Imaging spectroscopy versus field survey , 2015 .

[39]  D. Roberts,et al.  Differentiating plant species within and across diverse ecosystems with imaging spectroscopy , 2015 .

[40]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[41]  Michael Hopkin Ecology: Spying on nature , 2006, Nature.

[42]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .

[43]  J. Gamon,et al.  Remote sensing of biodiversity: Soil correction and data dimension reduction methods improve assessment of α-diversity (species richness) in prairie ecosystems , 2018 .

[44]  Enrique Alonso García,et al.  Towards global data products of Essential Biodiversity Variables on species traits , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[45]  W. Gould REMOTE SENSING OF VEGETATION, PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS, AND REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS , 2000 .

[46]  Gregory A. Carter,et al.  The use of hyperspectral remote sensing to assess vascular plant species richness on Horn Island, Mississippi , 2008 .

[47]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Satellite sensor requirements for monitoring essential biodiversity variables of coastal ecosystems , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  J. Rey‐Benayas,et al.  Landscape Ecology and Diversity Patterns in the Seasonal Tropics from Landsat TM Imagery , 1995 .

[49]  Forest Isbell,et al.  Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Airborne spectranomics: mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests , 2009 .

[51]  V. Hipkins,et al.  “Pando” Lives: Molecular Genetic Evidence of a Giant Aspen Clone in Central Utah , 2008 .

[52]  M. Schildhauer,et al.  Monitoring plant functional diversity from space , 2016, Nature Plants.

[53]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[54]  W. Turner Sensing biodiversity , 2014, Science.

[55]  Susan L Ustin,et al.  Remote sensing of plant functional types. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[56]  Haitao Li,et al.  Integrated Analysis of Productivity and Biodiversity in a Southern Alberta Prairie , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[57]  J. Gamon,et al.  Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[58]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Variability and Uncertainty Challenges in Scaling Imaging Spectroscopy Retrievals and Validations from Leaves Up to Vegetation Canopies , 2019, Surveys in Geophysics.

[59]  Fernando T. Maestre,et al.  Evaluating the performance of multiple remote sensing indices to predict the spatial variability of ecosystem structure and functioning in Patagonian steppes , 2013 .

[60]  Gustau Camps-Valls,et al.  Quantifying Vegetation Biophysical Variables from Imaging Spectroscopy Data: A Review on Retrieval Methods , 2018, Surveys in Geophysics.

[61]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Mesoscale assessment of changes in tropical tree species richness across a bioclimatic gradient in Panama using airborne imaging spectroscopy , 2015 .

[62]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[63]  J. Féret,et al.  Landscape-scale variation in plant community composition of an African savanna from airborne species mapping. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[64]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  The spatial sensitivity of the spectral diversity-biodiversity relationship: an experimental test in a prairie grassland. , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[65]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[66]  Walter Jetz,et al.  A global, remote sensing‐based characterization of terrestrial habitat heterogeneity for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling , 2015 .

[67]  J. Gamon,et al.  Influence of species richness, evenness, and composition on optical diversity: A simulation study , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[68]  K. Itten,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing for estimating aboveground biomass and for exploring species richness patterns of grassland habitats , 2011 .

[69]  Eren Turak,et al.  Building a global observing system for biodiversity , 2012 .

[70]  Thomas Wohlgemuth,et al.  Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists , 2002 .

[71]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Detecting prairie biodiversity with airborne remote sensing , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[73]  K. McGwire,et al.  Patterns of floristic richness in vegetation communities of California: regional scale analysis with multi-temporal NDVI , 2004 .

[74]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[75]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy links aspen genotype with below-ground processes at landscape scales , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.