Social cognition in leader?follower relationships: Applying insights from relationship science to understanding relationship?based approaches to leadership

Relationship-based approaches to leadership (e.g., Leader–Member Exchange theory) currently represent one of the most popular approaches to understanding workplace leadership. Although the concept of “relationship” is central to these approaches, generally this has not been well articulated and is often conceptualized simply in terms of relationship quality between the leader and the follower. In contrast, research in the wider relationship science domain provides a more detailed exposition of relationships and how they form and develop. We propose that research and methodology developed in relationship science (i.e., close relationships) can enhance understanding of the leader–follower relationship and therefore advance theory in this area. To address this issue, we organize our review in two areas. First, we examine how a social cognitive approach to close relationships can benefit an understanding of the leader–follower relationship (in terms of structure, content, and processes). Second, we show how the research designs and methodologies that have been developed in relationship science can be applied to understand better the leader–follower relationship. The cross-fertilization of research from the close relationships literature to understanding the leader–follower relationship provides new insights into leadership processes and potential avenues for further research.

[1]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Two Routes to Influence: Integrating Leader-Member Exchange and Social Network Perspectives , 2005 .

[2]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A Guide for the Estimation of Gender and Sexual Orientation Effects in Dyadic Data: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Approach , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  The Attachment Behavioral System in Adulthood: Activation, Psychodynamics, and Interpersonal Processes. , 2003 .

[4]  Janaki Gooty,et al.  Use and misuse of levels of analysis in leadership research: An illustrative review of leader–member exchange , 2012 .

[5]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Just the two of us: misalignment of theory and methods in examining dyadic phenomena. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Social comparison processes in organizations , 2007 .

[8]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Unlocking the Influence of Leadership Network Structures on Team Conflict and Viability , 2009 .

[9]  G. Lewandowski,et al.  Something's Missing: Need Fulfillment and Self-Expansion as Predictors of Susceptibility to Infidelity , 2006, The Journal of social psychology.

[10]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Mapping the Intimate Relationship Mind: Comparisons between Three Models of Attachment Representations , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[12]  Philip W. Wirtz,et al.  Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability , 1994 .

[13]  Heather Patrick,et al.  Implicit Theories of Relationships: Orientations Toward Evaluation and Cultivation , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[14]  P. Harms Adult attachment styles in the workplace , 2011 .

[15]  R. C. Fraley,et al.  Transference of attachment patterns: How important relationships influence feelings toward novel people , 2007 .

[16]  Robin Martin,et al.  From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  R. C. Fraley A connectionist approach to the organization and continuity of working models of attachment. , 2007, Journal of personality.

[18]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations , 1999 .

[20]  E. Berscheid The greening of relationship science. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[21]  Tiffany Keller Parental images as a guide to leadership sensemaking: an attachment perspective on implicit leadership theories , 2003 .

[22]  Nancy G. Boyd,et al.  A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships , 1998 .

[23]  Lorne Campbell,et al.  Ideal Standards, the Self, and Flexibility of Ideals in Close Relationships , 2001 .

[24]  F. Morgeson,et al.  The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time , 2009 .

[25]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  What About the Leader in Leader-Member Exchange? The Impact of Resource Exchanges and Substitutability on the Leader , 2010 .

[26]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review , 2005 .

[27]  R. Riggio,et al.  Leading groups: Leadership as a group process , 2013 .

[28]  O. Mayseless Attachment and the leader—follower relationship , 2010 .

[29]  Jeffry A. Simpson,et al.  The Dissolution of Romantic Relationships: Factors Involved in Relationship Stability and Emotional Distress , 1987 .

[30]  W. Ickes,et al.  Empathic accuracy of intimate partners in violent versus nonviolent relationships , 2007 .

[31]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[32]  M. Popper,et al.  Reliance on leaders and social institutions: An attachment perspective , 2007, Attachment & human development.

[33]  R. Collins For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-Evaluations , 1996 .

[34]  Robin Martin,et al.  Beyond personal Leader Member Exchange (LMX) quality: the effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions , 2008 .

[35]  R. Lord,et al.  Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts , 2001 .

[36]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Ideals in intimate relationships. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  A. Game Negative emotions in supervisory relationships: The role of relational models , 2008 .

[38]  C. Hazan,et al.  Attachment as an Organizational Framework for Research on Close Relationships , 1994 .

[39]  Jared A. LeDoux,et al.  The Impact of Interpersonal Perceptions on Team Processes , 2012 .

[40]  Mark W. Baldwin,et al.  Relational schemas and the processing of social information. , 1992 .

[41]  H. Reis,et al.  Interpersonal processes in close relationships. , 1988, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  Stefano Livi,et al.  A componential analysis of leadership using the social relations model , 2009 .

[43]  K. Locke,et al.  Agency and Communion in Naturalistic Social Comparison , 2000 .

[44]  J. Simpson,et al.  Adult Attachment Orientations, Stress, and Romantic Relationships , 2012 .

[45]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  The X-factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader–member exchange agreement , 2010 .

[46]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies , 2005 .

[47]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Relative leader-member exchange, negative affectivity and social identification: A moderated-mediation examination , 2012 .

[48]  T. Wills Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[49]  M. Diehl,et al.  What You Think is What You Get: Comparative Evaluations of Close Relationships , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[50]  P. Vidyarthi,et al.  Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader-member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  T. Ledermann,et al.  Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: a Structural Equation Modeling approach. , 2009, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[52]  A. Aron,et al.  Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self , 1991 .

[53]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  The affective consequences of social comparison: either direction has its ups and downs. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  M. Popper,et al.  Back to basics: applying a parenting perspective to transformational leadership , 2003 .

[56]  L. Hawkley,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Loneliness , 2011, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[57]  E. Pomerantz,et al.  Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. , 2002 .

[58]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Relationships at Work: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Dyadic Work Relationships , 2009 .

[59]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field , 2007 .

[60]  Thomas Sy,et al.  What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories , 2010 .

[61]  R. Hackett,et al.  Attachment and emotion regulation: Compensatory interactions and leader–member exchange , 2012 .

[62]  David J. Henderson,et al.  Leader--member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: a multilevel examination. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  David A. Richards,et al.  Attachment at (not to) work: applying attachment theory to explain individual behavior in organizations. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  Jennifer G. Boldry,et al.  Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective. , 1999 .

[65]  K. Dindia,et al.  Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives on Maintaining Relationships , 1993 .

[66]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[67]  J. Lydon,et al.  Global and specific relational models in the experience of social interactions. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  C. Knee Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. , 1998 .

[69]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. , 1991 .

[70]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions , 1984 .

[72]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  The folly of theorizing “A” but testing “B”: A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed Leader–Member Exchange illustration , 2001 .

[73]  Robin Martin,et al.  Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[74]  P. Shaver,et al.  Leaders as attachment figures: leaders' attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers' performance and mental health. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.