COMMITMENT AND FLEXIBILITY IN THE DEVELOPING PARSER

[1]  Richard K. Larson,et al.  'Missing prepositions' and the analysis of English free relative clauses , 1987 .

[2]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  The movement analysis of temporal adverbial clauses1 , 2009, English Language and Linguistics.

[4]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Lexical structure and language comprehension , 1989 .

[7]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading , 2002 .

[8]  D. Amso,et al.  Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[9]  D. Mirman,et al.  Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[10]  Evan Kidd,et al.  Lexical and referential influences on on-line spoken language comprehension: A comparison of adults and primary-school-age children , 2007 .

[11]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Parsing to Learn , 1998 .

[12]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. , 2008 .

[13]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye-Movement Control in Reading , 2006 .

[14]  WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al.  Linguistic Structure and Speech Shadowing at Very Short Latencies , 1973, Nature.

[15]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Decisions, decisions: infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible , 2006, Cognition.

[16]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Sentence processing without empty categories , 1991 .

[17]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  The diagnosis and cure of garden paths , 1994 .

[18]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Regularizing Unpredictable Variation: The Roles of Adult and Child Learners in Language Formation and Change , 2005 .

[19]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  Reconstruction, Binding, and Scope , 2007 .

[20]  A. Inoue,et al.  Information-paced parsing of Japanese , 1995 .

[21]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[22]  G. Altmann,et al.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm , 2005, Cognition.

[23]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Subjacency as a processing phenomenon , 1993 .

[24]  Henk J Haarmann,et al.  Active maintenance of sentence meaning in working memory: evidence from EEG coherences. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  Andrea Gualmini,et al.  Some knowledge children don't lack , 2004 .

[26]  D. Fox,et al.  Condition A and Scope Reconstruction , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[27]  Jos J. A. Van Berkum,et al.  What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect , 2007, Brain Research.

[28]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[29]  K. Rayner,et al.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[31]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  Memory-Load Interference in Syntactic Processing , 2002, Psychological science.

[32]  C. Felser,et al.  Antecedent Priming at Trace Positions in Japanese Long-Distance Scrambling , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[33]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[34]  R. Hamilton.  The Insignificance of Learners' Errors: A Philosophical Investigation of the Interlanguage Hypothesis. , 2001 .

[35]  R. Gómez.  Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[36]  J. de Villiers,et al.  Relative clauses are barriers to wh-movement for young children , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[37]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  D. Amso,et al.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Rita M. Manzini,et al.  Parameters, binding theory and learnability , 1987 .

[40]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[41]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Assigning referents to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Experimental tests of binding theory , 2006 .

[42]  P. Deane.  Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena , 1991 .

[43]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Ming-Wei Lee,et al.  Another Look at the Role of Empty Categories in Sentence Processing (and Grammar) , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[45]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension , 1982 .

[46]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  Development of Executive Control and Language Processing , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[47]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[49]  Arthur Stepanov,et al.  Successive cyclicity as residual wh-scope marking , 2006 .

[50]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[51]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis , 2001 .

[52]  C. Phillips.  The Real-Time Status of Island Phenomena , 2007 .

[53]  Nelleke Strik,et al.  Scope-marking Strategies in the Acquisition of Long Distance wh-Questions in French and Dutch , 2008, Language and speech.

[54]  Bradley L. Pritchett.  Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .

[55]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  The Acquisition of Long-Distance Rules , 1990 .

[56]  Kara D. Federmeier.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[57]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parsing Temporarily Ambiguous Complements , 1987 .

[58]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[59]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[60]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Issues in Italian Syntax , 1981 .

[61]  G. Altmann,et al.  The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing , 2007 .

[62]  David M. Perlmutter.  Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[63]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development , 1982 .

[64]  C. Heycock.  Asymmetries in reconstruction , 1995 .

[65]  C.-T. James Huang,et al.  Reconstruction and the structure of VP: some theoretical consequences , 1993 .

[66]  E. Gibson.  The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[67]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Evidence against the use of subcategorisation frequency in the processing of unbounded dependencies , 2003 .

[68]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[69]  R. Levy.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[70]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[71]  Kate Nation,et al.  Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[72]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[73]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Incremental Pre-Head Attachment in Japanese Parsing. , 1999 .

[74]  Dana Mcdaniel.  Partial and multiple Wh-movement , 1989 .

[75]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[76]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[77]  C. Clifton,et al.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[78]  N. Pearlmutter,et al.  Constraints on sentence comprehension , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[79]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Formal Principles of Language Acquisition , 1980 .

[80]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[81]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[82]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[83]  Robert Kluender,et al.  On the distinction between strong and weak islands: a processing perspective , 1998 .

[84]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Using eye movements as a developmental measure within psycholinguistics , 2008 .

[85]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts , 2000 .

[86]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[87]  C. Felser,et al.  Antecedent Priming at Trace Positions in Children’s Sentence Processing , 2007, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[88]  G. Altmann.  Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: the ‘blank screen paradigm’ , 2004, Cognition.

[89]  Mandy Simons,et al.  Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition , 2007 .

[90]  John Hale,et al.  The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[91]  Stephen Crain,et al.  On not being led down the kindergarten path , 2003 .

[92]  P. Suppes.  The Semantics of Children's Language , 1974 .

[93]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases , 1994 .

[94]  C. Phillips,et al.  ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[95]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Knowledge and learning in natural language , 2000 .

[96]  Barbara Lust,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Chinese children's knowledge of the Binding Principles , 2006 .

[97]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[98]  A. Weighall,et al.  The kindergarten path effect revisited: children's use of context in processing structural ambiguities. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[99]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Child Language Data Exchange System: an update , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[100]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[101]  G. Altmann.  Ambiguity in sentence processing , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[102]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Multiple dependencies and the role of the grammar in real-time comprehension1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[103]  Yuji Takano.  Predicate fronting and internal subjects , 1995 .

[104]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Online Syntactic Storage Costs in Sentence Comprehension. , 2005 .

[105]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[106]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[107]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[108]  Michael L. Geis,et al.  Adverbial subordinate clauses in English , 1970 .

[109]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[110]  Charles D. Yang.  Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[111]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world , 2004 .

[112]  Julie E. Boland.  Linking Eye Movements to Sentence Comprehension in Reading and Listening , 2004 .

[113]  B. Ambridge,et al.  The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[114]  Rosalind Thornton,et al.  Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics , 1998 .

[115]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[116]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[117]  Thomas Roeper,et al.  Answering hard questions: Wh-movement across dialects and disorder , 2008, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[118]  Ray Cattell,et al.  Constraints on Movement Rules , 1976 .

[119]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .

[120]  Adele Diamond,et al.  Bootstrapping conceptual deduction using physical connection: rethinking frontal cortex , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[121]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  On the middle and ergative constructions in English , 1984 .

[122]  R. Clark.  The Selection of Syntactic Knowledge , 1992 .

[123]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[124]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[125]  L Konieczny,et al.  Locality and Parsing Complexity , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[126]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[127]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Cross-linguistic Differences in Children’s Syntax for Locative Verbs , 1999 .

[128]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[129]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies , 1991 .

[130]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[131]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Constraints on Movement Phenomena in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 1996 .

[132]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[133]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes , 2007 .

[134]  C. Phillips,et al.  Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence , 2009, Brain and Language.

[135]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[136]  T. Love,et al.  The Processing of Non-canonically Ordered Constituents in Long Distance Dependencies by Pre-school Children: a Real-time Investigation , 2007, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[137]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[138]  Patrick Sturt,et al.  Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery , 2007, Cognition.

[139]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[140]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Left-Corner Parsing and Psychological Plausibility , 1992, COLING.

[141]  M J Pickering,et al.  Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: lexical information and verb-argument assignment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[142]  P. Niyogi,et al.  Learning from triggers , 1996 .

[143]  E. Mark Gold,et al.  Language Identification in the Limit , 1967, Inf. Control..

[144]  B. McElree,et al.  Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. , 1998 .

[145]  A. Gualmini,et al.  The Question–Answer Requirement for scope assignment , 2008 .

[146]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading , 2006, Brain Research.

[147]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Linguistic vs. Conceptual Sources of Implicit Agents in Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .

[148]  J. W. Kimball,et al.  Predictive analysis and over-the-top parsing , 1975 .

[149]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[150]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[151]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[152]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[153]  S Koh.  The Resolution of the Dative NP Ambiguity in Korean , 1997, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[154]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Interaction with autonomy: Multiple Output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide , 1996, Cognition.

[155]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora , 2007 .

[156]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[157]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The Subset Principle in syntax: costs of compliance , 2005, Journal of Linguistics.

[158]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[159]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Anticipatory Processes in Sentence Processing , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[160]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  One Frog, Two Frog, Red Frog, Blue Frog: Factors Affecting Children's Syntactic Choices in Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[161]  A. Weinberg,et al.  Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language , 2004 .

[162]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[163]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[164]  Masaya Yoshida,et al.  Incremental Processing of Coreference and Binding in Japanese , 2009 .

[165]  C. Pollard.  Anhaphors in English and the scope of binding theory , 1992 .

[166]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Statistical Learning of Syntax: The Role of Transitional Probability , 2007 .

[167]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[168]  Erika Hoff,et al.  Input and the Acquisition of Language: Three Questions , 2008 .

[169]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle , 2008, Psychological science.

[170]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .

[171]  Arthur Stepanov.  WH‐scope marking in Slavic , 2000 .

[172]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[173]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Natural language parsing: How can grammars help parsers? , 1985 .

[174]  M. Crocker.  Computational Psycholinguistics: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Study of Language , 1995 .

[175]  John C Trueswell,et al.  Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[176]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  READING-TIME EVIDENCE FOR INTERMEDIATE LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE IN LONG-DISTANCE DEPENDENCIES , 2004 .

[177]  Adrian Staub,et al.  The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[178]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[179]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  THE TIME-COURSE OF PROCESSING SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM EYE MOVEMENTS DURING SPOKEN NARRATIVES , 2001 .

[180]  Virginia Valian,et al.  Logical and Psychological Constraints on the Acquisition of Syntax , 1990 .

[181]  S. Liversedge,et al.  The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[182]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Why children aren't universally successful with quantification , 2006 .

[183]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[184]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies , 2009 .