The Influence of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Profiles on Team Development Processes

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most common personality assessments and a frequently used instrument for team development. However, in relation to team development processes, there is little research and literature on the role of personality in general and the usefulness of MBTI in particular. This article starts with a review of the MBTI and explores the relationship between MBTI profiles and team processes using a sample of 1,630 people working in 156 teams in a Swedish industrial organization. The results show that only a small number of MBTI personality profiles have a significant relationship with team processes. Overall, the composition of teams in terms of MBTI profiles does not seem to predict team development very well. Findings suggest that the MBTI may be used as an instrument for personal development and as a vehicle for group members to gain a better understanding of each other.

[1]  E. Molleman,et al.  Empowerment and team development , 1998 .

[2]  B. Kuipers,et al.  Team development and team performance. Responsibilities, responsiveness and results: a longitudinal study of teamwork at Volvo Trucks Umeå , 2005 .

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. , 1989, Journal of personality.

[4]  Dave Bartram,et al.  The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality , 1996 .

[5]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to Study Managers: A Literature Review and Research Agenda , 1996 .

[6]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  STRATEGIC DECISIONS MADE BY TOP EXECUTIVES AND MIDDLE MANAGERS WITH DATA AND PROCESS DOMINANT STYLES , 1990 .

[7]  R. Meredith Belbin,et al.  Team Roles at Work , 2022 .

[8]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  The effects of conflict asymmetry on mediation outcomes: Satisfaction, work motivation and absenteeism , 2006 .

[9]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[10]  Dexter Dunphy,et al.  Teams: Panaceas or Prescriptions for Improved Performance? , 1996 .

[11]  Artemis Chang,et al.  Understanding the Multidimensionality of Group Development , 2006 .

[12]  Tjai M. Nielsen,et al.  Group Personality Composition and Group Effectiveness , 2005 .

[13]  E. Salas,et al.  Personality and group performance. , 1987 .

[14]  Ben S. Kuipers,et al.  Teamwork: a case study on development and performance , 2005 .

[15]  Janka I. Stoker,et al.  Development and performance of self-managing work teams: a theoretical and empirical examination , 2009 .

[16]  H. F. van Tuijl,et al.  The Big Five Personality Traits and Individual Satisfaction With the Team , 2006 .

[17]  Helen Baron,et al.  Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement , 1996 .

[18]  K. R. Milner,et al.  A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[20]  Steven J. Armstrong,et al.  Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work Teams , 2001 .

[21]  Barbara Senior,et al.  Team Role Preference and Cognitive Styles , 2005 .

[22]  Peter Herriot,et al.  Assessment centre dimensions, personality and aptitudes , 1990 .

[23]  Bianey Ruiz Ulloa,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Individual Myers-Briggs Personality Dimensions , 2004 .

[24]  I. B. Myers.  The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). , 1962 .

[25]  Jim Maxon,et al.  Innovators, Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs: Food for Thought , 1986 .

[26]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[27]  P. Hanges,et al.  A network model of organizational climate: Friendship clusters, subgroup agreement, and climate schemas , 2008 .

[28]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Personality and Occupational Behavior: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Correlates of Managerial Practices in Two Cultures , 1993 .

[29]  I. B. Myers.  Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[30]  Lynne McClure,et al.  Personality Variables in Management Development Interventions , 1993 .

[31]  G. Huber.  Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .

[32]  C. G. Jung.  Psychological Types , 2000 .

[33]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[34]  Jan de Leede,et al.  Self-managing teams in manufacturing companies: Implications for the engineering function , 1999 .

[35]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  Why I Advocate the Five-Factor Model: Joint Factor Analyses of the NEO-PI with Other Instruments , 1989 .

[36]  L. Offermann,et al.  The Science and Practice of Team Development: Improving the Link , 2001 .

[37]  R. Mann.  A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. , 1959 .

[38]  C. Gersick.  MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[39]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[40]  G. R. Bushe,et al.  Predicting Organization Development Consulting Competence from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Stage of Ego Development , 1990 .

[41]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Time, Change, and Development , 2004 .

[42]  J. Kidd.  Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail , 1982 .

[43]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Decision style and strategic decisions of top executives , 1986 .