Talking Active Citizenship: Framing Welfare State Reform in England and the Netherlands

This article reviews how activation policies frame citizens as individual welfare agents. The analysis focuses on the framing of feeling rules employed by governments that encourage active citizenship, in this instance in the Netherlands and England. In England, encouraging voluntarism is central to the Big Society agenda; in the Netherlands, it is at the heart of the 2007 Social Support Act and more recent ideas on citizenship. Governments cannot compel their citizens to volunteer their time; they can, however, try to seduce people by playing on their emotions. Based on an analysis of thirty-nine policy documents and political speeches, we find that English politicians employ ‘empowerment talk’ calculated to trigger positive feelings about being active citizens, while Dutch politicians employ ‘responsibility talk’ conveying negative feelings about failure to participate more actively in society. Responsibility talk runs the risk that citizens respond with counter-responsibility claims, whereas empowerment talk can fail to incite sufficient enthousiasm among citizens.

[1]  E. Tonkens,et al.  Participation, responsibility and choice: summoning the active citizen in Western European welfare states , 2011 .

[2]  N. Rose,et al.  Governing "advanced" liberal democracies , 2013 .

[3]  Nick Acheson.  Service Delivery and Civic Engagement: Disability Organizations in Northern Ireland , 2001 .

[4]  Jeffrey C. Alexander,et al.  Social Performance: Cultural pragmatics: social performance between ritual and strategy , 2006 .

[5]  Jelmer Schalk,et al.  Op weg met de WMO: evaluatie van de Wet Maatschappelijke Ondersteuning 2007-2009 , 2010 .

[6]  E. Tonkens.  The embrace of responsibility: citizenship and governance of social care in the Netherlands , 2011 .

[7]  L. D'Ambrosio,et al.  Framing Emotional Response , 2004 .

[8]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields , 2007 .

[9]  J. Duyvendak,et al.  Discursive opportunities, feeling rules and the rise of protests against aircraft noise , 2009 .

[10]  Vando Borghi,et al.  Individualised service provision in an era of activation and new governance , 2007 .

[11]  Perri 6,et al.  Making People More Responsible: The Blair Governments' Programme for Changing Citizens' Behaviour , 2010 .

[12]  A. Walker,et al.  The Big Society: Back to the Future , 2012 .

[13]  Marco Briziarelli.  The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy , 2013 .

[14]  T. Basok,et al.  Community government: voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilization of citizens1 , 2004 .

[15]  John Clarke.  Publics, Politics and Power: remaking the public in public services. Sage, 2009 , 2009 .

[16]  Leslie Rebecca Bloom,et al.  The Volunteer Citizen After Welfare Reform in the United States: An Ethnographic Study of Volunteerism in Action , 2003 .

[17]  B. Kisby,et al.  The big society: power to the people? , 2010 .

[18]  Jeffrey Alexander.  Social Performance: Cultural pragmatics: social performance between ritual and strategy , 2006 .

[19]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[20]  E. Tonkens.  Working with Arlie Hochschild: connecting feelings to social change , 2012 .

[21]  A. Hochschild.  The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes From Home and Work , 2004 .

[22]  T. Lundström.  The state and voluntary social work in Sweden , 1996 .

[23]  Sylvia Fuller,et al.  Constructing ‘active citizenship’: single mothers, welfare, and the logics of voluntarism , 2008 .

[24]  M. Marinetto.  Who Wants to be an Active Citizen? , 2003 .

[25]  B. L. Smith,et al.  The voluntary sector. , 1982, Foundation news.

[26]  Nina Eliasoph.  Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare's End , 2011 .

[27]  P. Alcock.  Voluntary action, New Labour and the ‘third sector’1 , 2011 .

[28]  B. Vedres,et al.  The Politics of Civic Combinations , 2008 .

[29]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Crowding out Citizenship , 2000 .