Specificity of Linear Motifs That Bind to a Common Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Docking Groove

Three related kinases use distinct structural features to discriminate between linear docking motifs in potential binding partners. Docking with the Right Partner The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) participate in diverse biological processes, such as inflammation and cellular proliferation, and can be divided into the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38, and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) families. Potential binding partners have short linear “docking” motifs (7 to 17 amino acids) with a loosely defined consensus sequence, and these motifs associate with docking grooves in MAPKs. The docking grooves in the different MAPK families are quite similar in sequence. Garai et al. uncovered the structural features of the docking motifs that enable MAPKs to discriminate between potential binding partners. They used this information to manipulate the specificity of peptides corresponding to docking motifs found in MAPK binding partners—for example, a JNK1-specific peptide was altered so that it also bound to p38α and ERK2. Furthermore, they designed artificial peptides with engineered specificities to a particular MAPK or set of MAPKs. These results provide insight into how MAPKs differentiate between seemingly similar binding partners and could be used to disrupt a specific MAPK binding partner interaction in a targeted fashion. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) have a docking groove that interacts with linear “docking” motifs in binding partners. To determine the structural basis of binding specificity between MAPKs and docking motifs, we quantitatively analyzed the ability of 15 docking motifs from diverse MAPK partners to bind to c-Jun amino-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1), p38α, and extracellular signal–regulated kinase 2 (ERK2). Classical docking motifs mediated highly specific binding only to JNK1, and only those motifs with a sequence pattern distinct from the classical MAPK binding docking motif consensus differentiated between the topographically similar docking grooves of ERK and p38α. Crystal structures of four complexes of MAPKs with docking peptides, representing JNK-specific, ERK-specific, or ERK- and p38-selective binding modes, revealed that the regions located between consensus positions in the docking motifs showed conformational diversity. Although the consensus positions in the docking motifs served as anchor points that bound to common MAPK surface features and mostly contributed to docking in a nondiscriminatory fashion, the conformation of the intervening region between the anchor points mostly determined specificity. We designed peptides with tailored MAPK binding profiles by rationally changing the length and amino acid composition of intervening regions located between anchor points. These results suggest a coherent structural model for MAPK docking specificity that reveals how short linear motifs binding to a common kinase docking groove can mediate diverse interaction patterns and contribute to correct MAPK partner selection in signaling networks.

[1]  M. Karin,et al.  JNK1: A protein kinase stimulated by UV light and Ha-Ras that binds and phosphorylates the c-Jun activation domain , 1994, Cell.

[2]  C. Slaughter,et al.  ERK phosphorylation potentiates Elk‐1‐mediated ternary complex formation and transactivation. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[3]  B. Dérijard,et al.  Transcription factor ATF2 regulation by the JNK signal transduction pathway , 1995, Science.

[4]  Jiahuai Han,et al.  Independent human MAP-kinase signal transduction pathways defined by MEK and MKK isoforms , 1995, Science.

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[6]  R. Kingston,et al.  Repression of human heat shock factor 1 activity at control temperature by phosphorylation. , 1996, Genes & development.

[7]  M Dickens,et al.  Nuclear accumulation of NFAT4 opposed by the JNK signal transduction pathway. , 1997, Science.

[8]  Jiahuai Han,et al.  Regulation of the MEF 2 Family of Transcription Factors by p 38 † , 1998 .

[9]  Phang-lang Chen,et al.  Expression of BRC Repeats in Breast Cancer Cells Disrupts the BRCA2-Rad51 Complex and Leads to Radiation Hypersensitivity and Loss of G2/M Checkpoint Control* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  A. Gavin,et al.  A MAP kinase docking site is required for phosphorylation and activation of p90rsk/MAPKAP kinase-1 , 1999, Current Biology.

[11]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  Identifying DNA and protein patterns with statistically significant alignments of multiple sequences , 1999, Bioinform..

[12]  Daniel R. Caffrey,et al.  The Evolution of the MAP Kinase Pathways: Coduplication of Interacting Proteins Leads to New Signaling Cascades , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[13]  K Kornfeld,et al.  Multiple docking sites on substrate proteins form a modular system that mediates recognition by ERK MAP kinase. , 1999, Genes & development.

[14]  Jiahuai Han,et al.  Regulation of the MEF2 Family of Transcription Factors by p38 , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  T. Mustelin,et al.  Inhibition of T Cell Signaling by Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase-targeted Hematopoietic Tyrosine Phosphatase (HePTP)* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Andrew D. Sharrocks,et al.  Targeting of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases to MEF2 Transcription Factors , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  E. Nishida,et al.  A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  T. Sturgill,et al.  Creation of a Stress-activated p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Zhenguo Wu,et al.  p38 and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases Regulate the Myogenic Program at Multiple Steps , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  A. Sharrocks,et al.  Docking domains and substrate-specificity determination for MAP kinases. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  E. Nishida,et al.  Identification of a docking groove on ERK and p38 MAP kinases that regulates the specificity of docking interactions , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[22]  Tom L. Blundell,et al.  Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51–BRCA2 complex , 2002, Nature.

[23]  O. Yazgan,et al.  Regulation of Two JunD Isoforms by Jun N-terminal Kinases* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  G. Johnson,et al.  Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways Mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 Protein Kinases , 2002, Science.

[25]  E. Nishida,et al.  Docking interactions in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. , 2002, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[26]  B. Qin,et al.  Smad3 allostery links TGF-beta receptor kinase activation to transcriptional control. , 2002, Genes & development.

[27]  Radha Akella,et al.  Crystal structures of MAP kinase p38 complexed to the docking sites on its nuclear substrate MEF2A and activator MKK3b. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[28]  M. White,et al.  c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) Mediates Feedback Inhibition of the Insulin Signaling Cascade* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  K. Parris,et al.  Catalytically active MAP KAP kinase 2 structures in complex with staurosporine and ADP reveal differences with the autoinhibited enzyme. , 2003, Structure.

[30]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A Docking Site in MKK4 Mediates High Affinity Binding to JNK MAPKs and Competes with Similar Docking Sites in JNK Substrates* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  T. Gibson,et al.  Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. , 2003, Structure.

[32]  L. Holzman,et al.  Recruitment of JNK to JIP1 and JNK-dependent JIP1 Phosphorylation Regulates JNK Module Dynamics and Activation* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Docking sites on mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinases, MAPK phosphatases and the Elk-1 transcription factor compete for MAPK binding and are crucial for enzymic activity. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[34]  S. Nagata,et al.  Mnk2 and Mnk1 Are Essential for Constitutive and Inducible Phosphorylation of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E but Not for Cell Growth or Development , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[35]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  Docking motif interactions in MAP kinases revealed by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[36]  Bo Zhou,et al.  Molecular Determinants of Substrate Recognition in Hematopoietic Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A conserved protein interaction network involving the yeast MAP kinases Fus3 and Kss1 , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  A. Musti,et al.  Differential Phosphorylation of c-Jun and JunD in Response to the Epidermal Growth Factor Is Determined by the Structure of MAPK Targeting Sequences* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  A. Whitmarsh,et al.  Docking Interactions in the c-Jun N-terminal Kinase Pathway* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Sam-Yong Park,et al.  Structural basis for the selective inhibition of JNK1 by the scaffolding protein JIP1 and SP600125 , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[41]  T. Gibson,et al.  Systematic Discovery of New Recognition Peptides Mediating Protein Interaction Networks , 2005, PLoS biology.

[42]  R. Russell,et al.  Linear motifs: Evolutionary interaction switches , 2005, FEBS letters.

[43]  Luciano Milanesi,et al.  Systematic analysis of human kinase genes: a large number of genes and alternative splicing events result in functional and structural diversity , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[44]  J. Blenis,et al.  Spatially Separate Docking Sites on ERK2 Regulate Distinct Signaling Events In Vivo , 2005, Current Biology.

[45]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  The role of docking interactions in mediating signaling input, output, and discrimination in the yeast MAPK network. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[46]  W. Lim,et al.  Docking interactions in protein kinase and phosphatase networks. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  M. Gaestel,et al.  MAPKAP kinases — MKs — two's company, three's a crowd , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[48]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[49]  Bo Zhou,et al.  Structural basis of docking interactions between ERK2 and MAP kinase phosphatase 3. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Analysis of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and interactions with regulators and substrates. , 2006, Methods.

[51]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  Docking interactions induce exposure of activation loop in the MAP kinase ERK2. , 2006, Structure.

[52]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Interacting JNK-docking Sites in MKK7 Promote Binding and Activation of JNK Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  István Simon,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm035 Structural bioinformatics Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs , 2022 .

[54]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[55]  Léon Personnaz,et al.  Enrichment or depletion of a GO category within a class of genes: which test? , 2007, Bioinform..

[56]  C. Lepre,et al.  Crystal Structure of the P38α-MAPKAP Kinase 2 Heterodimer* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  E. Olson,et al.  MEF2: a central regulator of diverse developmental programs , 2007, Development.

[58]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[59]  R. Russell,et al.  Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[60]  J. Blenis,et al.  The RSK family of kinases: emerging roles in cellular signalling , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[61]  Zigang Dong,et al.  Structural basis for activation of the autoinhibitory C-terminal kinase domain of p90 RSK2 , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[62]  Michael Kracht,et al.  Peptides as signaling inhibitors for mammalian MAP kinase cascades. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.

[63]  Rachael P. Huntley,et al.  The GOA database in 2009—an integrated Gene Ontology Annotation resource , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[64]  Kenneth H. Buetow,et al.  PID: the Pathway Interaction Database , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[65]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Selectivity of Docking Sites in MAPK Kinases* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  Lyle Ungar,et al.  Sequence Alignment Reveals Possible MAPK Docking Motifs on HIV Proteins , 2010, PloS one.

[67]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[68]  Mingjie Zhang,et al.  Phosphorylation of DCC by ERK2 is facilitated by direct docking of the receptor P1 domain to the kinase. , 2010, Structure.

[69]  B. Zhao,et al.  Loops Govern SH2 Domain Specificity by Controlling Access to Binding Pockets , 2010, Science Signaling.

[70]  P. Shapiro,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of ERK2 Interactions with Substrate Proteins , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[71]  Mario Albrecht,et al.  FunSimMat update: new features for exploring functional similarity , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[72]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[73]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Computational Prediction and Experimental Verification of New MAP Kinase Docking Sites and Substrates Including Gli Transcription Factors , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[74]  María Martín,et al.  Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[75]  Matko Bosnjak,et al.  REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms , 2011, PloS one.

[76]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[77]  M. Vigneron,et al.  A Cytoplasmic Negative Regulator Isoform of ATF7 Impairs ATF7 and ATF2 Phosphorylation and Transcriptional Activity , 2011, PloS one.

[78]  S. Li,et al.  Evolving specificity from variability for protein interaction domains. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[79]  Philippe P Roux,et al.  Activation and Function of the MAPKs and Their Substrates, the MAPK-Activated Protein Kinases , 2011, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[80]  W. Peti,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Specificity of linear motifs that bind to a common mitogen-activated protein kinase docking groove. , 2013 .

[81]  Beau Dabbs,et al.  Summary and discussion of : “ Controlling the False Discovery Rate : A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing , 2014 .