Artificial Pancreas: from Control-to-Range to Control-to-Target

Abstract In the last decade, control algorithms designed for Artificial Pancreas (AP) systems were characterized by significant progresses. In particular, the Control-to-Range Model Predictive Control (MPC) showed its effectiveness and safety in several real life studies. Recent studies on model individualization and the enhanced quality of glucose sensors further improved the efficacy of MPC, thus allowing moving from a Control-to-Range to a Control-to-Target approach. In this study, an integral action in the MPC approach (IMPC) is proposed. This ensures beneficial effects in terms of regulation to the target in presence of disturbances such as delays, pump limitation and model uncertainties. The integral action is even more important when model individualization is performed since, during the identification phase, it allows to focus on the identification of the dynamical part of the model rather than to the static gain. The patient models considered in this contribution have been identified through a constrained optimization approach. A procedure for tuning the IMPC aggressiveness by considering both the glucose control performance and the integral of the error with respect to the target is described. Finally, in silico experiments are presented to assess the effectiveness of the proposed IMPC.

[1]  C. Cobelli,et al.  In Silico Preclinical Trials: A Proof of Concept in Closed-Loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[2]  B. Wayne Bequette,et al.  Challenges and recent progress in the development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas , 2012, Annu. Rev. Control..

[3]  L. Magni,et al.  Multicenter outpatient dinner/overnight reduction of hypoglycemia and increased time of glucose in target with a wearable artificial pancreas using modular model predictive control in adults with type 1 diabetes , 2015, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[4]  Giuseppe De Nicolao,et al.  MPC based Artificial Pancreas: Strategies for individualization and meal compensation , 2012, Annu. Rev. Control..

[5]  Malgorzata E. Wilinska,et al.  Overnight Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery with Model Predictive Control: Assessment of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Risk Using Simulation Studies , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[6]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Home use of closed-loop insulin delivery for overnight glucose control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a 4-week, multicentre, randomised crossover study. , 2014, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[7]  L. Magni,et al.  Model Predictive Control of Type 1 Diabetes: An in Silico Trial , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Artificial Pancreas: from in-silico to in-vivo , 2015 .

[10]  Lauren M. Huyett,et al.  Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Systems: Engineering the Algorithms , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[11]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Artificial Pancreas: Past, Present, Future , 2011, Diabetes.

[12]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Artificial Pancreas: Model Predictive Control Design from Clinical Experience , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[13]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Diabetes: Models, Signals, and Control , 2009 .

[14]  L. Magni,et al.  Day-and-Night Closed-Loop Glucose Control in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Under Free-Living Conditions: Results of a Single-Arm 1-Month Experience Compared With a Previously Reported Feasibility Study of Evening and Night at Home , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[15]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Outcome Measures for Artificial Pancreas Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[16]  David M Nathan,et al.  Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  2 month evening and night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: a randomised crossover trial. , 2015, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[18]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Coming of age: the artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes , 2016, Diabetologia.

[19]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Zone Model Predictive Control: A Strategy to Minimize Hyper- and Hypoglycemic Events , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[20]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Fully Integrated Artificial Pancreas in Type 1 Diabetes , 2012, Diabetes.

[21]  C. Cobelli,et al.  The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.