VISUAL GENDER AND ITS MOTIVATIONAL AND COGNITIVE EFFECTS - A USER STUDY

Cognitive and motivational effects of more neutral or androgynous-looking virtual characters versus more pronouncedly feminine-looking or masculine-looking virtual characters are explored. In a user study, 158 students aged 17-19 encountered four virtual characters that were visually manipulated to represent gender stereotypicality versus androgyny. One aim was to explore students’ attitudes towards the different characters as seen in how they ranked them as preferred presenters and how they articulated their arguments for doing so. Another aim was to look for patterns as to which character(s) influenced female and male students most posi-tively with respect to their attitudes towards a university level computer engineering programme. The combina-tion of these two aims allowed us to compare more conscious and articulated with less conscious and unarticu-lated, user responses. Results from the study are presented and discussed. We conclude by pointing towards future research and applications.

[1]  Scott McCloud.  Understanding comics: the invisible art = Memahami komik / Scott McCloud; penerjemah S. Kinanti , 2001 .

[2]  Michele Adams,et al.  Work–Family Imagery and Gender Stereotypes: Television and the Reproduction of Difference☆☆☆ , 1997 .

[3]  C. Cockburn,et al.  Gender and technology in the making , 1993 .

[4]  A. Bandura,et al.  Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. , 1981 .

[5]  D. Perrett,et al.  What Gives a Face its Gender? , 1993, Perception.

[6]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[7]  Geertjan Overbeek,et al.  ‘I'M NOT INTERESTED IN COMPUTERS’: Gender-based occupational choices of adolescents , 2007 .

[8]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. , 2000 .

[9]  C. Nass,et al.  Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[10]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Virtual pedagogical agents: stylisation for engagement , 2007 .

[11]  S. Bem,et al.  The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality , 1993 .

[12]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Visual Design of Virtual Pedagogical Agents: Naturalism versus Stylization in Static Appearance , 2006 .

[13]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Effects of"Gender" of Computer-Generated Speech on Credibility Perception , 2001 .

[14]  R. Lippa.  On Deconstructing and Reconstructing Masculinity–Femininity ☆ , 2001 .

[15]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  Interface agents as social models: the impact of appearance on females' attitude toward engineering , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[17]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Visual Stereotypes and Virtual Pedagogical Agents , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Visual Femininity and Masculinity in Synthetic Characters and Patterns of Affect , 2007, ACII.

[19]  David J. Schneider,et al.  The Psychology of Stereotyping , 2003 .

[20]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes , 2004 .

[21]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[22]  Roxzanne van Eyk,et al.  Judging a book by its cover , 2008 .

[23]  Ursula Kessels,et al.  Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects , 2005 .

[24]  B. Hannover,et al.  Self-to-Prototype Matching as a Strategy for Making Academic Choices. Why High School Students Do Not like Math and Science. , 2004 .

[25]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Pedagogical agents as social models for engineering: The influence of agent appearance on female choice , 2005, AIED.