Ecosystem multifunctionality of coastal marshes is determined by key plant traits.

Questions As biodiversity losses increase due to global change and human-induced habitat destruction, the relationships between plant traits and ecosystem properties can provide a new level of understanding ecosystem complexity. Using a functional response–effect approach, we show that multiple components of the carbon cycle are determined by a few plant traits, which in turn are strongly affected by environmental conditions. Location Salt marshes, northwest Germany. Methods We explored responses of morphological, chemical and biomass-related plant traits to environmental drivers and examined their effects on carbon cycle properties, i.e. above-ground biomass, above-ground net primary productivity and decomposition. The combined analysis between environmental parameters, functional traits and ecosystem properties used structural equation modelling (SEM). Results Important response and effect traits were leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and below-ground dry mass (BDM, responding to groundwater level and salinity) and leaf C:N ratio (responding to inundation frequency). Inundation and salinity led to increased allocation to below-ground biomass and salt stress adaptation in leaves, which translated into increased decomposition rates. Release from these abiotic controls resulted in standing biomass accumulation, which was controlled by LDMC and canopy height as key traits. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the interacting effects of non-consumable environmental factors and soil resources on morphological, chemical and biomass traits, which affected carbon cycle properties. Loss of species from the community has the potential to change the relationships between environment and vegetation-based ecosystem properties and therefore elicit effects on the multifunctionality of the entire and adjacent ecosystems.

[1]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services , 2013 .

[2]  B. Shipley,et al.  Linking plant and insect traits to understand multitrophic community structure in arid steppes , 2013 .

[3]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[4]  J. Megonigal,et al.  Tidal marsh plant responses to elevated CO2, nitrogen fertilization, and sea level rise , 2013, Global change biology.

[5]  M. Kleyer,et al.  Plant trait-environment relationships in salt marshes: Deviations from predictions by ecological concepts , 2012 .

[6]  Michael Kleyer,et al.  Plant trait responses to the environment and effects on ecosystem properties , 2012 .

[7]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability , 2012 .

[8]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services , 2012 .

[9]  P. Reich,et al.  Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[10]  M. Kleyer,et al.  Plant leaf economics and reproductive investment are responsive to gradients of land use intensity , 2011 .

[11]  Carlos M. Duarte,et al.  A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2 , 2011 .

[12]  B Shipley,et al.  Is leaf dry matter content a better predictor of soil fertility than specific leaf area? , 2011, Annals of botany.

[13]  Vanessa Minden,et al.  Testing the effect–response framework: key response and effect traits determining above‐ground biomass of salt marshes , 2011 .

[14]  B. Graae,et al.  An intraspecific application of the leaf-height-seed ecology strategy scheme to forest herbs along a latitudinal gradient , 2011 .

[15]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services , 2011 .

[16]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora , 2010 .

[17]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. , 2010 .

[18]  P. Sharpe,et al.  Patterns of wetland plant species richness across estuarine gradients of Chesapeake Bay , 2009, Wetlands.

[19]  F. Berendse,et al.  Effects of competition on root–shoot allocation in Plantago lanceolata L.: adaptive plasticity or ontogenetic drift? , 2009, Plant Ecology.

[20]  T. Flowers,et al.  Salinity tolerance in halophytes. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[21]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[22]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[23]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: the role of composite variables , 2008, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[24]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  A. Hector,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality , 2007, Nature.

[26]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[27]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: a standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[28]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[29]  S. Díaz,et al.  Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being , 2006, PLoS biology.

[30]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[31]  Eric Garnier,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION , 2004 .

[32]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[33]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Salt marshes along the coast of The Netherlands , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[34]  J. Rozema,et al.  Ecophysiological adaptations of coastal halophytes from foredunes and salt marshes , 1985, Vegetatio.

[35]  R. Ydenberg,et al.  Vegetation growth and a seasonal habitat shift of the barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis) , 1985, Oecologia.

[36]  Daan Bos,et al.  Creating new foraging opportunities for dark-bellied brent Branta bernicla and barnacle geese Branta leucopsis in spring insights from a large-scale experiment , 2003 .

[37]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[38]  R. J. Olson,et al.  Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements , 2002 .

[39]  K. Niklas,et al.  Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[40]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[41]  M. Willig,et al.  Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities , 2000 .

[42]  Daan Bos,et al.  Are spring staging brent geese evicted by vegetation succession , 2000 .

[43]  Mark Westoby,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCES IN LEAF STRUCTURE AND CHEMISTRY, COMPARING RAINFALL AND SOIL NUTRIENT GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[44]  M. Roderick,et al.  Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology , 1999 .

[45]  Anna-Christina Bockelmann,et al.  Competitive exclusion of Elymus athericus from a high‐stress habitat in a European salt marsh , 1999 .

[46]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns , 1999 .

[47]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[48]  J B Grace,et al.  On the Use of Path Analysis and Related Procedures for the Investigation of Ecological Problems , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[49]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Vegetation succession and herbivory in a salt marsh: changes induced by sea level rise and silt deposition along an elevational gradient , 1997 .

[51]  James B. Grace,et al.  A Structural Equation Model of Plant Species Richness and Its Application to a Coastal Wetland , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[52]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Year-to-year variation in peak above-ground biomass of six salt-marsh angiosperm communities as related to rainfall deficit and inundation frequency. , 1990 .

[53]  W. Armstrong,et al.  Plant zonation and the effects of the spring-neap tidal cycle on soil aeration in a humber salt marsh , 1985 .

[54]  B. Efron Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[55]  J. P. Grime Vegetation classification by reference to strategies , 1974, Nature.

[56]  J. P. Riley,et al.  A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters , 1962 .