Adjunctive HPV In-Situ Hybridization (ISH) Assay as an Aid in the Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Cervical Tissue Specimens: An Analytical and Functional Characterization

The purpose of this study was to develop and analytically and functionally validate a new human papillomavirus (HPV) in-situ hybridization (ISH) assay and to determine whether the use of this assay combined with hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining could potentially improve the diagnostic accuracy of interpreting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in human cervical tissue specimens. An automated HPV ISH assay was developed using probes that targeted the broad spectrum of HPV genotypes most commonly associated with CIN. In an exploratory study, tissue sections (n=118) were stained with H&E alone and H&E with HPV ISH and evaluated by 6 general surgical pathologists. Results were compared with diagnoses established by expert pathologists on H&E alone. The change in specificity (diagnosis of no-CIN) and sensitivity (diagnosis of CIN) using H&E plus HPV versus H&E alone was determined. The HPV ISH assay detected 21 HPV genotypes and demonstrated no cross-reactivity to Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1, HSV-2, or human placental DNA. The assay detected HPV in a range of 1 to 600 copies on CaSki, HeLa, and SiHa xenografts. Use of this assay with H&E staining improved the average diagnostic specificity of the surgical pathologists from 68.5% to 89.9% (P<0.001), with fewer false-positive CIN 1 results (122 vs. 39). The diagnostic sensitivity was similar for assessments made with H&E alone and those made with HPV plus H&E (93.1% vs. 93.6%). In conclusion, a new automated broad-spectrum HPV ISH assay combined with H&E-stained slides contributed to better ascertainment of CIN than H&E staining alone.

[1]  A. Brüning,et al.  Evaluation of two commercialised in situ hybridisation assays for detecting HPV-DNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue , 2011, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  M. Stoler,et al.  Using Biomarkers as Objective Standards in the Diagnosis of Cervical Biopsies , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[3]  G. Collina,et al.  The reproducibility of CIN diagnoses among different pathologists: data from histology reviews from a multicenter randomized study. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  M. Madeleine,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Prevalence and Attribution of Human Papillomavirus Types among Cervical, Vaginal, and Vulvar Precancers and Cancers in the United States , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  L. Elit,et al.  Reproducibility of the Histological Diagnosis of Cervical Dysplasia Among Pathologists From 4 Continents , 2008, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[6]  Bing Cai,et al.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Diagnosis Among an Experienced Panel of Gynecologic Pathologists , 2007, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[7]  N. Sneige,et al.  Evaluation of a Commercialized In Situ Hybridization Assay for Detecting Human Papillomavirus DNA in Tissue Specimens from Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Carcinoma , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  Diane Solomon,et al.  2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Calum MacAulay,et al.  Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  S. Franceschi,et al.  Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distribution in Low-Grade Cervical Lesions: Comparison by Geographic Region and with Cervical Cancer , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  L. Elit Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1 , 2004, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[12]  S. Franceschi,et al.  Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: a meta-analysis , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  K. Cooper,et al.  Optimization of biotinyl-tyramide-based in situ hybridization for sensitive background-free applications on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens , 2003, BMC clinical pathology.

[14]  M. Heatley How should we grade CIN? , 2002, Histopathology.

[15]  T. Matsukura,et al.  Relationships between 80 human papillomavirus genotypes and different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: association and causality. , 2001, Virology.

[16]  M. Schiffman,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. , 2001, JAMA.

[17]  Deqin Sun,et al.  Coexistence of low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: morphologic progression or multiple papillomaviruses? , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  P W Hamilton,et al.  Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems. , 1996, Journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  D. Fish,et al.  Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1995, Journal of clinical pathology.

[20]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1989, BMJ.

[21]  A J Robertson,et al.  Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. , 1989, Journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  M. Braun,et al.  Structural and transcriptional analysis of human papillomavirus type 16 sequences in cervical carcinoma cell lines , 1987, Journal of virology.

[23]  R. Schlegel,et al.  Presence and expression of human papillomavirus sequences in human cervical carcinoma cell lines. , 1985, The American journal of pathology.

[24]  T. Wright,et al.  2006 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Adenocarcinoma in Situ , 2008 .