Behavior of Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Farms in Sand

Abstract Most offshore wind-turbine foundations are monopile foundations. Monopile foundations have the advantages of simple structures and are convenient to construct. In recent years, large-diameter monopile foundations, with diameters larger than 4 m, have been used in engineering applications to increase the bearing capacity of wind turbines. Increasing the foundation pile diameter changes the bearing characteristics from those of traditional small-diameter steel-pipe piles. However, research on the bearing characteristics of large-diameter steel-pipe piles is lacking; no mature method exists to estimate the bearing capacity. On the basis of numerical simulations, the differences between the stress and deformation characteristics of the pile body and the soil around it between large-diameter and small-diameter steel-pipe piles subjected to vertical loads and horizontal loads in sand are investigated in this study. A method to calculate the vertical bearing capacity, considering the soil-arching effect...

[1]  Run Liu,et al.  Soil Plug Effect Prediction and Pile Driveability Analysis for Large-Diameter Steel Piles in Ocean Engineering , 2009 .

[2]  Mark Randolph,et al.  One-dimensional analysis of soil plugs in pipe piles , 1991 .

[3]  Xinli Wu,et al.  Global lateral buckling analysis of idealized subsea pipelines , 2014 .

[4]  S. Lacasse,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN API PARAMETERS FOR PREDICTION OF AXIAL CAPACITY OF DRIVEN PILES IN SAND , 1989 .

[5]  Yang Min Design and analysis of monopile foundation for 3.6 MW offshore wind turbine , 2011 .

[6]  Rodrigo Salgado,et al.  Determination of bearing capacity of open-ended piles in sand , 2003 .

[7]  Alan J. Lutenegger,et al.  Influence of Pile Plugging on Skin Friction in Overconsolidated Clay , 1997 .

[8]  W. Flügge Stresses in Shells , 1960 .

[9]  Kenneth Gavin,et al.  The shaft capacity of pipe piles in sand , 2003 .

[10]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Numerical modelling of large diameter steel piles under monotonic and cyclic horizontal loading , 2007 .

[11]  Kerstin Lesny,et al.  Design of Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Energy Converters , 2009 .

[12]  Paul Doherty,et al.  Laterally loaded monopile design for offshore wind farms , 2012 .

[13]  Samuel G. Paikowsky,et al.  Scale Effects in Lateral Load Response of Large Diameter Monopiles , 2007 .

[14]  Gary Norris,et al.  MODELING LATERAL SOIL-PILE RESPONSE BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION , 2000 .

[15]  M. Bolton THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[16]  Barry Lehane,et al.  Development of the UWA-05 design method for open and closed ended driven piles in siliceous sand , 2007 .

[17]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Design of Piles for Offshore Wind Energy Foundations with Respect to Horizontal Loading , 2012 .

[18]  James A. Schneider,et al.  Database assessment of CPT-based design methods for axial capacity of driven piles in siliceous sands , 2008 .

[19]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Offshore Geotechnical Engineering , 2011 .

[20]  Brian F. Snyder,et al.  Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy , 2009 .

[21]  Samuel G. Paikowsky,et al.  The Mechanism of Pile Plugging in Sand , 1990 .

[22]  J. E. Gibson Thin Shells: Computing and Theory , 1980 .

[23]  E. Ventsel,et al.  Thin Plates and Shells: Theory: Analysis, and Applications , 2001 .

[24]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Estimation of lateral deformation of monopile foundations by use of cyclic triaxial tests , 2009 .

[25]  Jyant Kumar,et al.  Effect of footing width on Nγ , 2008 .

[26]  Young Su Kim,et al.  Experimental Load-Transfer Curves of Laterally Loaded Piles in Nak-Dong River Sand , 2004 .