e-collaboration: the reality of virtuality

With the development of new technologies, and particularly information and communication technologies (ICTs), teams have evolved to encompass new forms of interaction and collaboration. By focusing on the communicative dimensions of global virtual teams, this paper demonstrates that e-collaboration is more than a technological substitution for traditional face-to face collaboration. It places special emphasis on the importance of structuring activities for balancing electronic communication during e-collaboration (i.e., videoconference, email, chat session, distributed use of group support system) to bridge cultural and stereotypical gaps, to increase profitable role repartition between the participants, and to prevent and solve conflicts. During the past four years, the authors have developed a project involving hundreds of participants from different national cultures working together for six weeks on a specific project. In this paper, we present our experiences and draw conclusions, giving special attention to the structure of the electronic communication required to support efficient virtual teaming in education and industry.

[1]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Exploratory research on the role of national and professional cultures in a distributed learning project , 2001 .

[2]  Geert Hofstede,et al.  National cultures revisited , 1983 .

[3]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[4]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Reducing Status Effects with Computer-Mediated Communication: Evidence from Two Distinct National Cultures , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Clyde Kluckhohn,et al.  Culture and behavior , 1965 .

[6]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Adaptive Processes for Achieving Socio-Technical Fit in Computer Supported Co-operative Work Groups , 2000 .

[8]  Robert Vogel,et al.  Case Study GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN HONG KONG: An Action Research Project , 2000 .

[9]  Dianne Willis,et al.  The New Sociotech: Graffiti on the Long Wall , 2000 .

[10]  S. Chase,et al.  CULTURE AND BEHAVIOR , 1969 .

[11]  S. Harkins,et al.  Social loafing and group evaluation. , 1989 .

[12]  R. Keesing Cultural Anthropology: A Contemporary Perspective , 1997 .

[13]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Stereotypes and prejudice : essential readings , 2000 .

[16]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[17]  H. Scarbrough,et al.  The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology , 1995 .

[18]  H. B. English Resolving social conflicts. , 1949 .

[19]  H. Triandis The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[20]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[21]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause , 1977 .

[22]  Schahram Dustdar,et al.  Videoconferencing across cultures — a conceptual framework for floor control issues , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  T.M.A. Bemelmans,et al.  Group Support Systems and Virtual Collaboration: The HKNET Project , 2002 .

[24]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[25]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[26]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[27]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Using Group Support Systems for Software Inspections , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[28]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[29]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[30]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[31]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .