Robust optimum criteria for tuned mass dampers in fuzzy environments

Tuned mass dampers are widely adopted passive strategies for vibrations mitigation, in the past years extensively investigated to improve the offered protection level in any mechanical systems in which they are installed. Although different mechanical and energetic optimum criteria have been proposed in the last decades by assuming involved parameters as deterministically known, nowadays the need persists to explore more realistic approaches for virtue of the unavoidable presence of uncertain variables. In fact, deterministic-based optimum criteria often lead to incorrect design, evidently because it is an excessive oversimplification and heavily in conflict with practical circumstances. Consequently, searching for robustness-based criteria in the optimal design for this class of mechanical devices is a crucial question. In order to define a collection of solutions able to ensure an acceptable trade-off between mechanical performances and immunity against the variability of the involved parameters, robust-based design optimization is an important and alternative way for supporting design process. Typically, methods proposed until now are based on the probabilistic description of the uncertain variables and only few approaches consider uncertainties in both system and loads. In this paper, robust-based design optimization problems for tuned mass dampers are formulated and resolved in view of fuzzy environments. The antithetical objective functions of the problems are defined within the framework of the credibility theory: the first one is the fuzzy expected value of the adopted performance-based structural index, the second one is its fuzzy variance. Specifically, this latter is introduced to characterize the performance variability due to the existence of uncertain variables. In our analysis, protected systems are assumed subject to random vibrations, in the aim to extend the applicability of the proposed methodology to different and general (natural or artificial) dynamic loads. Both models for structural systems and dynamic loads include fuzzy variables, in order to take into account also epistemic uncertainties. Finally, several numerical applications are presented to investigate the practical utility of the obtained results.

[1]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Info-gap robust design with load and model uncertainties , 2005 .

[2]  Yian-Kui Liu,et al.  Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[3]  N C Nigam,et al.  Structural Optimization in Random Vibration Environment , 1972 .

[4]  M. C. Constantinou,et al.  Optimum design of a first story damping system , 1983 .

[5]  Nam Hoang,et al.  Design of multiple tuned mass dampers by using a numerical optimizer , 2005 .

[6]  Franco Bontempi,et al.  Fuzzy reliability analysis of concrete structures , 2004 .

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[8]  Rita Greco,et al.  STOCHASTIC OPTIMUM DESIGN CRITERION FOR LINEAR DAMPER DEVICES FOR BUILDING SEISMIC PROTECTION , 2007 .

[9]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robust Optimization - A Comprehensive Survey , 2007 .

[10]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of optimum stochastic nonstationary response spectra under uncertain soil parameters , 2008 .

[11]  F. Nadim Discussion of "Response of Uncertain Systems to Stochastic Excitation" , 1990 .

[12]  Sylvain Lignon,et al.  A robust approach for seismic damage assessment , 2007 .

[13]  Giuseppe Quaranta,et al.  Fuzzy-based robust structural optimization , 2008 .

[14]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Stochastic optimum design criterion for linear damper devices for seismic protection of buildings , 2007 .

[15]  I. Takewaki An approach to stiffness-damping simultaneous optimization , 2000 .

[16]  Giorgio Monti,et al.  Effects of non Synchronous Seismic Input on the Inelastic Response of Bridges , 1994 .

[17]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Constrained reliability-based optimization of linear tuned mass dampers for seismic control , 2007 .

[18]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics , 2005 .

[19]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory , 2006 .

[20]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy Probabilities : New Approach and Applications , 2005 .

[21]  F. Rüdinger Optimal vibration absorber with nonlinear viscous power law damping and white noise excitation , 2006 .

[22]  James J. Buckley Fuzzy Probabilities: New Approach and Applications (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing) , 2003 .

[23]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[24]  Baoding Liu Uncertainty Theory: An Introduction to its Axiomatic Foundations , 2004 .

[25]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Response spectrum method for multi‐support seismic excitations , 1992 .

[26]  A. Neumaier Interval methods for systems of equations , 1990 .

[27]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Modeling of nonstationary ground motion and analysis of inelastic structural response , 1990 .

[28]  Marco Lombardi,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF UNCERTAIN STRUCTURES USING NON-PROBABILISTIC MODELS , 1998 .

[29]  Hyun-Moo Koh,et al.  Integrated optimum design of viscoelastically damped structural systems , 2004 .

[30]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[31]  I. Doltsinis,et al.  ROBUST DESIGN OF STRUCTURES USING OPTIMIZATION METHODS , 2004 .

[32]  Didier Dubois Fuzzy sets and systems , 1980 .

[33]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[34]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy sets and systems ' . Theory and applications , 2007 .

[35]  Sumiji Fujii On Random Vibrations , 1970 .