Methane emissions from the 2015 Aliso Canyon blowout in Los Angeles, CA

The magnitude of a major methane leak The Aliso Canyon underground gas storage facility outside Los Angeles, CA, houses enormous natural gas reserves. One well at the site experienced a blowout in late October 2015 and began leaking gas until it was sealed in February 2016. Over the course of 13 flights in the region, Conley et al. sampled the air column and determined daily release rates of methane (a powerful greenhouse gas) and ethane throughout the leak. The methane release rates were nearly double that of the entire Los Angeles region combined. Thus, single vulnerabilities can have major implications for state and federal climate policy. Science, this issue p. 1317 Methane release rates from a single leak were nearly double that of the entire rest of the Los Angeles region. Single-point failures of natural gas infrastructure can hamper methane emission control strategies designed to mitigate climate change. The 23 October 2015 blowout of a well connected to the Aliso Canyon underground storage facility in California resulted in a massive release of natural gas. Analysis of methane and ethane data from dozens of plume transects, collected during 13 research-aircraft flights between 7 November 2015 and 13 February 2016, shows atmospheric leak rates of up to 60 metric tons of methane and 4.5 metric tons of ethane per hour. At its peak, this blowout effectively doubled the methane emission rate of the entire Los Angeles basin and, in total, released 97,100 metric tons of methane to the atmosphere.

[1]  L. Berg,et al.  Birmingham Case Study , 2017 .

[2]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Aircraft-Based Estimate of Total Methane Emissions from the Barnett Shale Region. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  E. Kort,et al.  Airborne Ethane Observations in the Barnett Shale: Quantification of Ethane Flux and Attribution of Methane Emissions. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Jian Lin,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations in crustal production at the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge, 25°N–27°30′N and 0–27 Ma , 2015 .

[5]  Jeff Peischl,et al.  Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions , 2015 .

[6]  E. Kort,et al.  Four corners: The largest US methane anomaly viewed from space , 2014 .

[7]  M. Zahniser,et al.  Demonstration of an ethane spectrometer for methane source identification. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver‐Julesburg Basin , 2014 .

[9]  Donald H. Lenschow,et al.  A Low-Cost System for Measuring Horizontal Winds from Single-Engine Aircraft , 2014 .

[10]  E. Kort,et al.  Mapping CH 4 : CO 2 ratios in Los Angeles with CLARS-FTS from Mount Wilson, California , 2014 .

[11]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.

[12]  Scot M. Miller,et al.  Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field , 2013 .

[14]  Gregory J. Frost,et al.  Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California , 2013 .

[15]  J. Peischl,et al.  Airborne observations of methane emissions from rice cultivation in the Sacramento Valley of California , 2012 .

[16]  M. Fischer,et al.  Seasonal variation of CH4 emissions from central California , 2012 .

[17]  Simone Meinardi,et al.  Chemical data quantify Deepwater Horizon hydrocarbon flow rate and environmental distribution , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Paul A Hsieh,et al.  Review of flow rate estimates of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Akihiko Kuze,et al.  Toward accurate CO_2 and CH_4 observations from GOSAT , 2011 .

[20]  Akihiko Kuze,et al.  Toward accurate CO2 and CH4 observations from GOSAT , 2011 .

[21]  Eric R. Crosson,et al.  High-accuracy continuous airborne measurements of greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) using the cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) technique , 2010 .

[22]  Geoffrey C. Toon,et al.  Tropospheric methane retrieved from ground‐based near‐IR solar absorption spectra , 2003 .

[23]  E. Atlas,et al.  Effect of petrochemical industrial emissions of reactive alkenes and NOx on tropospheric ozone formation in Houston, Texas , 2003 .

[24]  D. Blake,et al.  Description of the analysis of a wide range of volatile organic compounds in whole air samples collected during PEM-tropics A and B. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  E. Atlas,et al.  Observations of Ozone Formation in Power Plant Plumes and Implications for Ozone Control Strategies , 2001, Science.

[26]  B. Jobson,et al.  Emissions lifetimes and ozone formation in power plant plumes , 1998 .

[27]  Jessica A. Faust,et al.  Imaging Spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1998 .

[28]  Melissa G. Trainer,et al.  Regional ozone and urban plumes in the southeastern United States : Birmingham, a case study , 1995 .

[29]  Underground Gas Storage in the World , 1990 .

[30]  W H White,et al.  Formation and transport of secondary air pollutants: ozone and aerosols in the St. Louis urban plume. , 1976, Science.

[31]  Mary E. Eide.  Benzene , 1944 .

[32]  Christina Kluge,et al.  Data Reduction And Error Analysis For The Physical Sciences , 2016 .

[33]  R. A. Chadwick,et al.  Underground gas storage : worldwide experiences and future development in the UK and Europe , 2009 .

[34]  Daniel Taupin,et al.  Probabilities data reduction and error analysis in the physical sciences/ by Daniel Taupin , 1988 .