Between a rock and a hard place: women and computer technology

This paper explores certain possible reasons behind the uneasy relationship between women and technology. The cultural identification of technology with masculinity has been well documented through previous research. However, we feel it is useful to revisit this complex relationship through the scope of a more subtle distinction between ‘users’ and ‘connoisseurs’, and the struggle over power, which revolves around a specific form of hegemonic masculinity. We draw on interviews that examine students’ experiences, emotions, and statements about gender, technology, mathematics, and education, and we try to offer an understanding of the ways women negotiate their position within the dominant discourse about computing and mathematics. Our analysis employs post-structuralist discourse theory.

[1]  Dale Spender,et al.  Nattering on the Net: Women, Power and Cyberspace , 1996 .

[2]  R. Varma Women in Computing: The Role of Geek Culture , 2007 .

[3]  Michel Foucault,et al.  “Panopticism” from Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2009 .

[4]  William Aspray,et al.  The State of Research on Girls and IT , 2008 .

[5]  Rosalind Gill Technofeminism , 2005 .

[6]  J. Weizenbaum Computer Power And Human Reason: From Judgement To Calculation , 1978 .

[7]  "Being Good" at Maths: Fabricating Gender Subjectivity. , 2012 .

[8]  J. Jenson,et al.  Women@Work: Listening to gendered relations of power in teachers' talk about new technologies , 2003 .

[9]  M. Volman,et al.  Gender Equity and Information Technology in Education: The Second Decade , 2001 .

[10]  A. Chronaki Disrupting ‘Development’ as the Quality/Equity Discourse: Cyborgs and Subalterns in School Technoscience , 2010 .

[11]  J. Tambling How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics by N. Katherine Hayles (review) , 2001, Modern Language Review.

[12]  Barbara Pfeffer,et al.  Men And Masculinities , 2016 .

[13]  Sophia Huyer,et al.  Cinderella or Cyberella?: Empowering Women in the Knowledge Society , 2006 .

[14]  Gwyneth Hughes,et al.  Exploring the Availability of Student Scientist Identities within Curriculum Discourse: An anti-essentialist approach to gender-inclusive science , 2001 .

[15]  Karen Bradley,et al.  A Matter of Degrees: Female Underrepresentation in Computer Science Programs Cross-Nationally , 2006 .

[16]  Nancy Fraser Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of "Postmodernism" , 2017 .

[17]  G. Gutting The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[18]  M. Foucault The History of Sexuality , 1976 .

[19]  J. Butler Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[20]  Michael Yates Wall street: How it works and for whom , 1999 .

[21]  B. Francis,et al.  Boffin and geek identities: abject or privileged? , 2012 .

[22]  Alice Christie Using E-mail Within a Classroom Based on Feminist Pedagogy , 1997 .

[23]  Rosalind Gill Culture and Subjectivity in Neoliberal and Postfeminist Times , 2008 .

[24]  J. Angwin Choice, pathways and transitions post-16: new youth, new economies in the global city , 2003 .

[25]  Amit Prasad,et al.  Confronting the “Socialization” Barrier: Cross-Ethnic Differences in Undergraduate Women’s Preference for IT Education , 2006 .

[26]  Flis Henwood,et al.  Engineering Difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work in a college of technology , 1998 .

[27]  Allen Hunter,et al.  A discussion of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985). , 2016 .

[28]  Denise E. Agosto Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Jane Abbiss,et al.  Boys and machines: gendered computer identities, regulation and resistance , 2011 .

[30]  J. Butler Bodies That Matter On The Discursive Limits Of Sex , 1993 .

[31]  B. Fox,et al.  NATTERING ON THE NET , 1996 .

[32]  C. Mouffe The Return of the Political , 1993 .

[33]  M. Blaise “What a Girl Wants, What a Girl Needs”: Responding to Sex, Gender, and Sexuality in the Early Childhood Classroom , 2009 .

[34]  A. Colley,et al.  Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: what has changed? , 2003 .

[35]  Marie-Pierre Moreau,et al.  New media, old images: constructing online representations of women and men in science, engineering and technology , 2013 .

[36]  S. Clegg Theorising the Machine: Gender, education and computing , 2001 .

[37]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2020, On Violence.

[38]  P. Nilan Communication as culture , 2009 .

[39]  J. Weizenbaum From Computer Power and Human Reason From Judgment to Calculation , 2007 .

[40]  Carrie Paechter,et al.  Being Boys; Being Girls: Learning masculinities and femininities , 2007 .

[41]  R. Collier Masculinities , 2002 .

[42]  S. Ball,et al.  Choice, Pathways, and Transitions Post-16: New Youth, New Economies in the Global City , 2000 .

[43]  Valerie Walkerdine,et al.  The Mastery Of Reason: Cognitive Development And The Production Of Rationality , 1990 .

[44]  Wibke Backhaus,et al.  Judith Butler: Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge: New York 1990, 172 S. (dt. Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1991, 236 S.) , 2016 .

[45]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[46]  J. Jenson,et al.  Girl talk: gender, equity, and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture , 2003 .

[47]  C. Mouffe,et al.  Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics , 1988 .

[48]  J. Wajcman Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[49]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Gender and computing: persisting differences , 1995 .

[50]  C. Haywood,et al.  ‘What's next for masculinity?’ Reflexive directions for theory and research on masculinity and education , 2012 .