Adaptive Evolution of Pelvic Reduction in Sticklebacks by Recurrent Deletion of a Pitx1 Enhancer

Adaptive Girdle Loss in Sticklebacks How do molecular changes give rise to phenotypic adaptation exemplified by the repeated reduction in the pelvic girdle observed in separate populations of sticklebacks? Now Chan et al. (p. 302, published online 10 December) have identified the specific DNA changes that control this major skeletal adaptation. The key locus controlling pelvic phenotypes mapped to a noncoding regulatory region upstream of the Pituitary homeobox transcription factor 1 gene, which drives a tissue-specific pelvic enhancer. Multiple populations showed independent deletions in this region and enhancer function was inactivated. Reintroduction of the enhancer restored pelvic development in a pelvic-reduced stickleback. Loss of a tissue-specific enhancer explains multiple parallel losses of the pelvic girdle in stickleback populations. The molecular mechanisms underlying major phenotypic changes that have evolved repeatedly in nature are generally unknown. Pelvic loss in different natural populations of threespine stickleback fish has occurred through regulatory mutations deleting a tissue-specific enhancer of the Pituitary homeobox transcription factor 1 (Pitx1) gene. The high prevalence of deletion mutations at Pitx1 may be influenced by inherent structural features of the locus. Although Pitx1 null mutations are lethal in laboratory animals, Pitx1 regulatory mutations show molecular signatures of positive selection in pelvic-reduced populations. These studies illustrate how major expression and morphological changes can arise from single mutational leaps in natural populations, producing new adaptive alleles via recurrent regulatory alterations in a key developmental control gene.

[1]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. , 2000, Genetics.

[2]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Parallel genetic origins of pelvic reduction in vertebrates , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  EVOLUTION OF PELVIC REDUCTION IN THREESPINE STICKLEBACK FISH: A TEST OF COMPETING HYPOTHESES , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Jeremy Schmutz,et al.  Widespread Parallel Evolution in Sticklebacks by Repeated Fixation of Ectodysplasin Alleles , 2005, Science.

[5]  S. Carroll Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution , 2008, Cell.

[6]  A. McGregor,et al.  Morphological evolution through multiple cis-regulatory mutations at a single gene , 2007, Nature.

[7]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[8]  M. King,et al.  Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. , 1975, Science.

[9]  C. Tickle,et al.  Expression of limb initiation genes and clues to the morphological diversification of threespine stickleback , 2003, Current Biology.

[10]  H. Swarup Stages in the development of the stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.). , 1958, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[11]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[12]  C. Lanctôt,et al.  Hindlimb patterning and mandible development require the Ptx1 gene. , 1999, Development.

[13]  D. Schluter,et al.  Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks , 2004, Nature.

[14]  W. Modell Population, Species and Evolution , 1971 .

[15]  A. Mccarthy Development , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  T. Reimchen Spine-deficiency and polymorphism in a population of Gasterosteus aculeatus , 1980 .

[17]  S. Foster,et al.  The Evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback , 1995 .

[18]  J. Cockram,et al.  The Role of Double-Stranded Break Repair in the Creation of Phenotypic Diversity at Cereal VRN1 Loci , 2007, Genetics.

[19]  David L Stern,et al.  The Loci of Evolution: How Predictable is Genetic Evolution? , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  Gene Hunt,et al.  EVOLUTION TOWARD A NEW ADAPTIVE OPTIMUM: PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION IN A FOSSIL STICKLEBACK LINEAGE , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  T. Glover,et al.  Mechanisms of common fragile site instability. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[22]  Matthew P. Travis,et al.  Directional asymmetry of pelvic vestiges in threespine stickleback. , 2007, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[23]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[24]  S. Scherer,et al.  Molecular Basis for Expression of Common and Rare Fragile Sites , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  C. Laurie,et al.  Molecular dissection of a major gene effect on a quantitative trait: the level of alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1996, Genetics.

[26]  A. I.,et al.  Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure–Function Partitioning of Cognitive–Emotional Brain Networks , 2023, Biology.

[27]  Catherine A. Wilson,et al.  Parallel genetic basis for repeated evolution of armor loss in Alaskan threespine stickleback populations. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Reist Predation upon pelvic phenotypes of brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans, by selected invertebrates , 1980 .

[29]  C. Peichel,et al.  Parallel evolution of Pitx1 underlies pelvic reduction in Scottish threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). , 2007, The Journal of heredity.

[30]  S. Scherer,et al.  Molecular characterization of a common fragile site (FRA7H) on human chromosome 7 by the cloning of a simian virus 40 integration site. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Hinchliffe The development of the vertebrate limb , 1980 .

[32]  M. Bell Interacting evolutionary constraints in pelvic reduction of threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus (Pisces, Gasterosteidae) , 1987 .

[33]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  The Evolution of Gene Regulation Underlies a Morphological Difference between Two Drosophila Sister Species , 2008, Cell.

[34]  R. Nielsen Molecular signatures of natural selection. , 2005, Annual review of genetics.

[35]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[36]  Sarah Chaney,et al.  Behaviour , 2010, The Lancet.

[37]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  J. Coyne,et al.  THE LOCUS OF EVOLUTION: EVO DEVO AND THE GENETICS OF ADAPTATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  N. Giles The possible role of environmental calcum levels during the evolution of phenotypic diversity in Outer Hebridean populations of the Three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus , 2010 .

[40]  David J. Chen,et al.  Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability. , 2005, Genes & development.

[41]  Akihiro Urasaki,et al.  Insertional mutagenesis by the Tol2 transposon-mediated enhancer trap approach generated mutations in two developmental genes: tcf7 and synembryn-like , 2007, Development.

[42]  S. Warren,et al.  Replication stress induces tumor-like microdeletions in FHIT/FRA3B , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.