Honey bee waggle dance communication: signal meaning and signal noise affect dance follower behaviour

Returning honey bee foragers perform waggle dances to inform nestmate foragers about the presence, location and odour of profitable food sources and new nest sites. The aim of this study is to investigate how the characteristics of waggle dances for natural food sources and environmental factors affect dance follower behaviour. Because food source profitability tends to decrease with increasing foraging distance, we hypothesised that the attractiveness of a dance, measured as the number of dance followers and their attendance, decreases with increasing distance to the advertised food location. Additionally, we determined whether time of year and dance signal noise, quantified as the variation in waggle run direction and duration, affect dance follower behaviour. Our results suggest that bees follow fewer waggle runs as the food source distance increases, but that they invest more time in following each dance. This is because waggle run duration increases with increasing foraging distance. Followers responded to increased angular noise in dances indicating more distant food sources by following more waggle runs per dance than when angular noise was low. The number of dance followers per dancing bee was also affected by the time of year and varied among colonies. Our results provide evidence that both noise in the message, that is variation in the direction component, and the message itself, that is the distance of the advertised food location, affect dance following. These results indicate that dance followers may pay attention to the costs and benefits associated with using dance information.

[1]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Honeybee foragers increase the use of waggle dance information when private information becomes unrewarding , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Randolf Menzel,et al.  Variability in the encoding of spatial information by dancing bees , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Honey bees use social information in waggle dances more fully when foraging errors are more costly , 2012 .

[4]  M. Lindauer,et al.  Über die „Mißweisung” bei den richtungsweisenden Tänzen der Bienen , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  C. Grüter,et al.  Floral scents affect the distribution of hive bees around dancers , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  T. Judd The waggle dance of the honey bee: Which bees following a dancer successfully acquire the information? , 1994, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[7]  C. Grüter,et al.  The honeybee waggle dance: can we follow the steps? , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  J. Bastian,et al.  How do newly recruited honey bees approach a food site? , 1970, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[9]  M. Hrncir,et al.  Food Exploitation By Social Insects : Ecological, Behavioral, and Theoretical Approaches , 2009 .

[10]  K. Frisch,et al.  Über den Schwänzeltanz der Bienen , 1957, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[11]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh's ants , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  L. L. Buckley,et al.  Use of foraging trails by Norway rats , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  T. Seeley,et al.  The use of waggle dance information by honey bees throughout their foraging careers , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  R. Menzel,et al.  A Common Frame of Reference for Learned and Communicated Vectors in Honeybee Navigation , 2011, Current Biology.

[15]  C. Grüter,et al.  Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  P H Wells,et al.  Honey Bee Recruitment to Food Sources: Olfaction or Language? , 1969, Science.

[17]  D. Tanner,et al.  Does the body orientation of waggle dance followers affect the accuracy of recruitment? , 2011, Apidologie.

[18]  Åke Brännström,et al.  Synergy in social communication , 2008 .

[19]  P. H. Wells,et al.  Anatomy of a Controversy: The Question of a Language among Bees , 1990 .

[20]  Karl von Frisch,et al.  Über die "Sprache" der bienen : Eine tierpsychologische Untersuchung , 1923 .

[21]  Christoph Grüter,et al.  Past Experiences Affect Interaction Patterns Among Foragers and Hive‐Mates in Honeybees , 2009 .

[22]  P. Sherman,et al.  Naked mole-rats recruit colony mates to food sources , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior, 2nd ed. , 2010 .

[24]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Working against gravity: horizontal honeybee waggle runs have greater angular scatter than vertical waggle runs , 2012, Biology Letters.

[25]  P. Visscher,et al.  Do honey bees average directions in the waggle dance to determine a flight direction? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  R. Morse The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees , 1994 .

[27]  T. Seeley,et al.  Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[28]  P. Kirk Visscher,et al.  Adaptation or constraint? Reference-dependent scatter in honey bee dances , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  A. Michelsen Signals and flexibility in the dance communication of honeybees , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[31]  Mandyam V Srinivasan,et al.  Floral scents induce recall of navigational and visual memories in honeybees , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  C. R. Ribbands COMMUNICATION BETWEEN HONEYBEES. I: THE RESPONSE OF CROP-ATTACHED BEES TO THE SCENT OF THEIR CROP , 2009 .

[33]  J. Nieh Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) , 2004 .

[34]  T. Seeley The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies , 1995 .

[35]  M. Beekman,et al.  Dance precision of Apis florea—clues to the evolution of the honeybee dance language? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Intra-dance variation among waggle runs and the design of efficient protocols for honey bee dance decoding , 2012, Biology Open.

[37]  M. J. Couvillon The dance legacy of Karl von Frisch , 2012, Insectes Sociaux.

[38]  Margaret J. Couvillon,et al.  Too much noise on the dance floor , 2013, Communicative & integrative biology.

[39]  C. Thom,et al.  The Scent of the Waggle Dance , 2007, PLoS biology.

[40]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[41]  S. Schneider,et al.  The vibration signal, modulatory communication and the organization of labor in honey bees, Apis mellifera , 2004 .

[42]  F. Dyer The biology of the dance language. , 2002, Annual review of entomology.

[43]  D. Mautz,et al.  Der Kommunikationseffekt der Schwänzeltänze bei Apis mellifica carnica (Pollm.) , 1971, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[44]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[45]  W. Farina,et al.  The interplay between dancing and trophallactic behavior in the honey bee Apis mellifera , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.