A tighter variant of Jensen's lower bound for stochastic programs and separable approximations to recourse functions

In this paper, we propose a new method to compute lower bounds on the optimal objective value of a stochastic program and show how this method can be used to construct separable approximations to the recourse functions. We show that our method yields tighter lower bounds than Jensen's lower bound and it requires a reasonable amount of computational effort even for large problems. The fundamental idea behind our method is to relax certain constraints by associating dual multipliers with them. This yields a smaller stochastic program that is easier to solve. We particularly focus on the special case where we relax all but one of the constraints. In this case, the recourse functions of the smaller stochastic program are one dimensional functions. We use these one dimensional recourse functions to construct separable approximations to the original recourse functions. Computational experiments indicate that our lower bounds can significantly improve Jensen's lower bound and our recourse function approximations can provide good solutions.

[1]  Julia L. Higle,et al.  Finite master programs in regularized stochastic decomposition , 1994, Math. Program..

[2]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  ESTIMATING THE FORM OF NATURAL SELECTION ON A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  Handbooks in operations research and management science , 1989 .

[4]  Antonio Alonso Ayuso,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 2009 .

[5]  W. Lieberman The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management , 2005 .

[6]  A. Madansky Bounds on the Expectation of a Convex Function of a Multivariate Random Variable , 1959 .

[7]  Warrren B Powell,et al.  An Adaptive, Distribution-Free Algorithm for the Newsvendor Problem with Censored Demands, with Applications to Inventory and Distribution , 2001 .

[8]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  An Algorithm for Multistage Dynamic Networks with Random Arc Capacities, with an Application to Dynamic Fleet Management , 1996, Oper. Res..

[9]  R. Wets,et al.  Stochastic programming , 1989 .

[10]  David P. Morton,et al.  Restricted-Recourse Bounds for Stochastic Linear Programming , 1999, Oper. Res..

[11]  Stein W. Wallace A piecewise linear upper bound on the network recourse function , 1987, Math. Program..

[12]  Michael McAleer,et al.  A decision rule to minimize daily capital charges in forecasting value-at-risk , 2010 .

[13]  George R. Price,et al.  Selection and Covariance , 1970, Nature.

[14]  Roger J.-B. Wets,et al.  Sublinear upper bounds for stochastic programs with recourse , 1987, Math. Program..

[15]  P. Wilson,et al.  Variation in the intensity of pollination inDrosera tracyi: Selection is strongest when resources are intermediate , 1995, Evolutionary Ecology.

[16]  J. Birge,et al.  A separable piecewise linear upper bound for stochastic linear programs , 1988 .

[17]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.