Experimental and numerical heat transfer from vortex-injection interaction in scramjet flowfields

Air-breathing propulsion has the potential to decrease the cost per kilogram for access-to-space, while increasing the flexibility of available low earth orbits. However, to meet the performance requirements, fuel-air mixing inside of scramjet engines and thermal management still need to be improved. An option to address these issues is to use intrinsically generated vortices from scramjet inlets to enhance fuel-air mixing further downstream, leading to shorter, less internal drag generating, and thus more efficient engines. Previous works have studied this vortex-injection interaction numerically, but validation was impractical due to lack of published experimental data. This paper extends upon these previous works by providing experimental data for a canonical geometry, obtained in the T4 Stalker Tube at Mach 8 flight conditions, and assesses the accuracy of numerical methodologies such as RANS CFD to predict the vortex-injection interaction. Focus is placed on understanding the ability of the numerical methodology to replicate the most important aspects of the vortex-injection interaction. Results show overall good agreement between the numerical and experimental results, as all major features are captured. However, limitations are encountered, especially due to a localised region of over predicted heat flux.

[1]  J. Hank,et al.  The X-51A Scramjet Engine Flight Demonstration Program , 2008 .

[2]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Reusable Launch of Small Satellites Using Scramjets , 2017 .

[3]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Design of an Airbreathing Second Stage for a Rocket-Scramjet-Rocket Launch Vehicle , 2013 .

[5]  Dylan J. Wise,et al.  Roughness-Induced Transition of Hypervelocity Boundary Layers , 2014 .

[6]  K. Itoh,et al.  Hypervelocity aerothermodynamic and propulsion research using a high enthalpy shock tunnel HIEST , 1999 .

[7]  G. Candler,et al.  Data-Parallel Line Relaxation Method for the Navier -Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[8]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Orbital Delivery of Small Payloads Using Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion , 2009 .

[9]  Luke J. Doherty,et al.  An experimental investigation of an airframe integrated three-dimensional scramjet engine at a Mach 10 flight condition , 2014 .

[10]  C. Law.  Three-Dimensional Shock Wave-Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions at Mach 6 , 1975 .

[11]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  How much compression should a scramjet inlet Do , 2012 .

[12]  Uwe Hueter,et al.  NASA's Integrated Space Transportation Plan — 3rd generation reusable launch vehicle technology update , 2003 .

[13]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  Development of a hybrid unstructured implicit solver for the simulation of reacting flows over complex geometries , 2004 .

[15]  Dylan Wise.  Experimental investigation of a three dimensional scramjet engine at hypervelocity conditions , 2015 .

[16]  R. Gollan,et al.  Effect of Vortex-injection Interaction on Wall Heat Transfer in a Flat Plate with Fin Corner Geometry , 2017 .

[17]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Experimental investigation of inlet injection in a scramjet with rectangular to elliptical shape transition , 2009 .

[19]  Catherine Bahm,et al.  Overview With Results and Lessons Learned of the X-43A Mach 10 Flight , 2005 .

[20]  Rainer Matthias Kirchhartz.  Upstream Wall Layer Effects on Drag Reduction with Boundary Layer Combustion , 2009 .

[21]  Sanford Gordon,et al.  Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions , 1972 .

[22]  Luke J. Doherty,et al.  Estimation of high-enthalpy flow conditions for simple shock and expansion processes using the ESTCj program and library , 2014 .

[23]  Katsuyoshi Tanimizu.  Nozzle optimization study and measurements for a quasi-axisymmetric scramjet model , 2008 .

[24]  Charles McClinton,et al.  X-43 - Scramjet Power Breaks the Hypersonic Barrier: Dryden Lectureship in Research for 2006 , 2006 .

[25]  Wilson Y. K. Chan.  Effects of flow non-uniformities on the drag reduction by boundary layer combustion , 2012 .

[26]  Peter A. Jacobs,et al.  About the formulation, verification and validation of the hypersonic flow solver Eilmer , 2013 .

[27]  R. G. Morgan,et al.  Transition of compressible high enthalpy boundary layer flow over a flat plate , 1994, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[28]  David J. Mee.  Uncertainty Analysis of Conditions in the Test Section of the T4 Shock Tunnel , 1993 .

[29]  Allan Paull,et al.  Scramjets and shock tunnels—The Queensland experience , 2005 .

[30]  Andrew N. Ridings.  Investigation of pre-combustion shock trains in a sramjet using a shock tunnel at Mach 8 flight conditions , 2015 .

[31]  P. Bradshaw,et al.  Physical and Computational Aspects of Convective Heat Transfer , 1984 .

[32]  Jie Tan,et al.  Stress Limiter Consideration for k-omega Turbulence Models in Shock-Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interactions in Supersonic and Hypersonic Flows , 2011 .

[33]  Sang-Hyeon Lee,et al.  Characteristics of Dual Transverse Injection in Scramjet Combustor, Part 1: Mixing , 2006 .

[34]  P. Roache.  Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies , 1994 .

[35]  David W. Riggins,et al.  Vortex generation and mixing in three-dimensional supersonic combustors , 1993 .

[36]  John M. Seiner,et al.  Historical Survey on Enhanced Mixing in Scramjet Engines , 2001 .

[37]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Effects of Hydrogen Fuel Injection in a Mach 12 Scramjet Inlet , 2015 .

[38]  Russell R. Boyce,et al.  Investigation of an axisymmetric scramjet configuration utilising inlet-injection and radical farming , 2009 .

[39]  Farrukh S. Alvi,et al.  Physical Model of the Swept Shock Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Flowfield , 1992 .

[40]  M. A. Kegerise,et al.  Receptivity of Hypersonic Boundary Layers over Straight and Flared Cones , 2010 .