Expression Signature as a Biomarker for Prenatal Diagnosis of Trisomy 21

A universal biomarker panel with the potential to predict high-risk pregnancies or adverse pregnancy outcome does not exist. Transcriptome analysis is a powerful tool to capture differentially expressed genes (DEG), which can be used as biomarker-diagnostic-predictive tool for various conditions in prenatal setting. In search of biomarker set for predicting high-risk pregnancies, we performed global expression profiling to find DEG in Ts21. Subsequently, we performed targeted validation and diagnostic performance evaluation on a larger group of case and control samples. Initially, transcriptomic profiles of 10 cultivated amniocyte samples with Ts21 and 9 with normal euploid constitution were determined using expression microarrays. Datasets from Ts21 transcriptomic studies from GEO repository were incorporated. DEG were discovered using linear regression modelling and validated using RT-PCR quantification on an independent sample of 16 cases with Ts21 and 32 controls. The classification performance of Ts21 status based on expression profiling was performed using supervised machine learning algorithm and evaluated using a leave-one-out cross validation approach. Global gene expression profiling has revealed significant expression changes between normal and Ts21 samples, which in combination with data from previously performed Ts21 transcriptomic studies, were used to generate a multi-gene biomarker for Ts21, comprising of 9 gene expression profiles. In addition to biomarker’s high performance in discriminating samples from global expression profiling, we were also able to show its discriminatory performance on a larger sample set 2, validated using RT-PCR experiment (AUC=0.97), while its performance on data from previously published studies reached discriminatory AUC values of 1.00. Our results show that transcriptomic changes might potentially be used to discriminate trisomy of chromosome 21 in the prenatal setting. As expressional alterations reflect both, causal and reactive cellular mechanisms, transcriptomic changes may thus have future potential in the diagnosis of a wide array of heterogeneous diseases that result from genetic disturbances.

[1]  Arnold J. Stromberg,et al.  Statistical implications of pooling RNA samples for microarray experiments , 2003, BMC Bioinform..

[2]  J. Haerting,et al.  Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[4]  Ingo Ruczinski,et al.  Primary and secondary transcriptional effects in the developing human Down syndrome brain and heart , 2005, Genome Biology.

[5]  Marc S Williams,et al.  Rapid ACCE: Experience with a rapid and structured approach for evaluating gene-based testing , 2007, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  J M Delabar,et al.  Classification of human chromosome 21 gene-expression variations in Down syndrome: impact on disease phenotypes. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  N. Hastie,et al.  Transcriptome analysis of human autosomal trisomy. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[8]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Y. Yaron,et al.  Genome-wide expression analysis of cultured trophoblast with trisomy 21 karyotype. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[10]  H. Lehrach,et al.  Meta-analysis of heterogeneous Down Syndrome data reveals consistent genome-wide dosage effects related to neurological processes , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[11]  Anne-Laure Boulesteix,et al.  CMA – a comprehensive Bioconductor package for supervised classification with high dimensional data , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  Maqc Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control ( MAQC )-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models , 2012 .

[13]  R. Quatrano Genomics , 1998, Plant Cell.

[14]  A. Holland,et al.  Gene expression profiling in the adult Down syndrome brain. , 2007, Genomics.

[15]  M. Delorenzi,et al.  Natural gene-expression variation in Down syndrome modulates the outcome of gene-dosage imbalance. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  F. Hsieh,et al.  Gene expression variation increase in trisomy 21 tissues , 2008, Mammalian Genome.

[17]  B. Tycko,et al.  Cell type-specific over-expression of chromosome 21 genes in fibroblasts and fetal hearts with trisomy 21 , 2006, BMC Medical Genetics.

[18]  Donna K Slonim,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of amniotic fluid cell-free mRNA suggests that oxidative stress is significant in Down syndrome fetuses , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  L. Vitale,et al.  Gene Expression Profile Analysis in Human T Lymphocytes from Patients with Down Syndrome , 2004, Annals of human genetics.

[20]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[21]  Dario Greco,et al.  Altered expression of mitochondrial and extracellular matrix genes in the heart of human fetuses with chromosome 21 trisomy , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[22]  A. Dufke,et al.  Specific transcriptional changes in human fetuses with autosomal trisomies , 2008, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.