The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary

Questions exist over the extent to which social media content may bypass, follow, or attract the attention of traditional media. This study sheds light on such dynamics by examining intermedia agenda-setting effects among the Twitter feeds of the 2012 presidential primary candidates, Twitter feeds of the Republican and Democratic parties, and articles published in the nation's top newspapers. Daily issue frequencies within media were analyzed using time series analysis. A symbiotic relationship was found between agendas in Twitter posts and traditional news, with varying levels of intensity and differential time lags by issue. While traditional media follow candidates on certain topics, on others they are able to predict the political agenda on Twitter.

[1]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[2]  John H. Parmelee Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices , 2013 .

[3]  James L. Powell,et al.  Time Series Models , 2021, Stochastic Limit Theory.

[4]  D. Lilleker Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age , 2014 .

[5]  Spiro K. Kiousis,et al.  First- and Second-Level Agenda-Building and Agenda-Setting Effects: Exploring the Linkages Among Candidate News Releases, Media Coverage, and Public Opinion During the 2002 Florida Gubernatorial Election , 2006 .

[6]  M. Roberts,et al.  Agenda setting and political advertising: Origins of the news agenda , 1994 .

[7]  Michael McDevitt,et al.  Competing for Attention: Information Subsidy Influence in Agenda Building during Election Campaigns , 2009 .

[8]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  A Test of Media-Centered Agenda Setting: Newspaper Content and Public Interests in a Presidential Election , 1998 .

[9]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[10]  Bethany A. Conway,et al.  Twitter Use by Presidential Primary Candidates During the 2012 Campaign , 2013 .

[11]  J. Tedesco Issue and Strategy Agenda Setting in the 2004 Presidential Election: exploring the candidate–journalist relationship , 2005 .

[12]  David A. Dulio,et al.  New Media and Political Marketing in the United States: 2012 and Beyond , 2012 .

[13]  David D. Perlmutter,et al.  Political Blogging and Campaign 2008: A Roundtable , 2008 .

[14]  M. McCombs Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion , 2004 .

[15]  Tina McCorkindale,et al.  Dialogue and transparency: A content analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used twitter☆ , 2013 .

[16]  Adam Rose,et al.  Reducing conflicts between climate policy and energy policy in the US: The important role of the states , 2006 .

[17]  Scott W. Dunn Candidate and Media Agenda Setting in the 2005 Virginia Gubernatorial Election , 2009 .

[18]  A. Harvey Time series models , 1983 .

[19]  Karen M. Lancendorfer,et al.  Who Influences Whom? The Agenda-Building Relationship Between Political Candidates and the Media in the 2002 Michigan Governor's Race , 2010 .

[20]  J. Tedesco,et al.  Issue and Strategy Agenda-Setting in the 2000 Presidential Primaries , 2001 .

[21]  W. Bennett,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .

[22]  Kristen D. Landreville,et al.  Blogging and Hyperlinking: use of the Web to enhance viability during the 2004 US campaign , 2005 .

[23]  Danny Hayes,et al.  Party Reputations, Journalistic Expectations: How Issue Ownership Influences Election News , 2008 .

[24]  M. Broersma,et al.  BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS , 2012 .

[25]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Introduction: The Facebook Election , 2010 .

[26]  John R. Petrocik Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study , 1996 .

[27]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[28]  Michael Pfau,et al.  The Impact of Web Site Campaigning on Traditional News Media and Public Information Processing , 2003 .

[29]  P. Aparaschivei The Use of New Media in Electoral Campaigns: Analysis on the Use of Blogs, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in the 2009 Romanian Presidential Campaign , 2011 .

[30]  Jennifer Lees-Marshment,et al.  Political Marketing in the United States , 2014 .

[31]  Platzer Obama Administration Rejects Keystone XL Pipeline Permit Request: Could Congress Nevertheless Approve It? , 2015 .

[32]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the Election Cycle and Beyond. , 2006 .

[33]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Issue Ownership in Primary and General Presidential Debates , 2004 .

[35]  L. Sigelman,et al.  Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–2000 , 2004 .

[36]  Stefaan Walgrave,et al.  The Contingency of the Mass Media's Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory , 2006 .

[37]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Capturing campaign dynamics, 2000 and 2004 : the national Annenberg election survey , 2006 .

[38]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[39]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[40]  Malcolm R. Parks Big Data in Communication Research: Its Contents and Discontents , 2014 .

[41]  David J. Atkin,et al.  Agenda setting and micro-blog use: An analysis of the relationship between Sina Weibo and newspaper agendas in China , 2013 .

[42]  U. Klinger MASTERING THE ART OF SOCIAL MEDIA , 2013 .

[43]  Andreas Jungherr The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content , 2014 .

[44]  A. Bruns,et al.  #Ausvotes: How twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election , 2011 .

[45]  T. P. Boyle Intermedia Agenda Setting in the 1996 Presidential Election , 2001 .

[46]  Emily T. Metzgar,et al.  Social Media and the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election , 2009 .

[47]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[48]  Kristen D. Landreville,et al.  Evolution of Online Campaigning: Increasing Interactivity in Candidate Web Sites and Blogs Through Text and Technical Features , 2006 .

[49]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000 , 2003 .

[50]  E. López-Escobar,et al.  Two Levels of Agenda Setting Among Advertising and News in the 1995 Spanish Elections , 1998 .

[51]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Framing peak petroleum as a public health problem: audience research and participatory engagement in the United States. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[52]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda‐Setting Theory Meets Big Data , 2014 .

[53]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF INFLUENTIALS AND THE ROLE OF SENTIMENT IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ON TWITTER DURING ELECTION PERIODS , 2013 .

[54]  Daniel Lipinski,et al.  Using “New” Media to Get “Old” Media Coverage , 2004 .

[55]  W. Grant,et al.  Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians' use of the Social Network Tool Twitter , 2010 .

[56]  Stephen D. Reese,et al.  Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content , 1995 .

[57]  Bryan E. Denham Toward Conceptual Consistency in Studies of Agenda-Building Processes: A Scholarly Review , 2010 .

[58]  Guy J. Golan,et al.  Intermedia Agenda Setting in Television, Advertising, and Blogs During the 2004 Election , 2008 .

[59]  Gracie Lawson-Borders,et al.  Blogs in Campaign Communication , 2005 .

[60]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Agenda Setting in a Digital Age: Tracking Attention to California Proposition 8 in Social Media, Online News and Conventional News , 2010 .

[61]  David F. Damore The Dynamics of Issue Ownership in Presidential Campaigns , 2004 .

[62]  Jacob Groshek,et al.  Agenda Trending: Reciprocity and the Predictive Capacity of Social Networking Sites in Intermedia Agenda Setting across Topics over Time , 2013 .

[63]  John H. Parmelee The agenda-building function of political tweets , 2014, New Media Soc..