Fostering reading comprehension in fifth grade by explicit instruction in reading strategies and peer tutoring.

BACKGROUND Research reveals that explicit reading strategies instruction and engaging students in interaction about texts promote students' reading comprehension ability. The present intervention study combines both aspects. AIMS The study examines the educational benefits of explicit reading strategies instruction, followed by practice in (a) teacher-led whole-class activities (STRAT), (b) reciprocal same-age (STRAT + SA), or (c) cross-age peer tutoring activities (STRAT + CA) on fifth graders' reading comprehension achievement. SAMPLE Twenty-two fifth-grade teachers and their 454 students from 19 different schools throughout Flanders (Belgium) participated. METHOD A quasi-experimental pretest post-test retention test design was used with three experimental (STRAT, STRAT + SA, and STRAT + CA) and a matched control group. The experimental interventions were implemented during an entire school year. RESULTS Multilevel analysis revealed that the STRAT and STRAT + CA condition made a significantly larger pretest to retention test progress than the control group. The significant major progress was especially situated from pretest to post-test, during which the intervention took place. Concerning the STRAT + SA condition no significant differences with regard to the control group were detected. Pairwise comparisons of the experimental conditions indicated that the STRAT + CA condition's progress from pretest to retention test also exceeded the STRAT + SA condition's advancement significantly. CONCLUSION The study corroborated the efficacy of the STRAT and STRAT + CA conditions' interventions as feasible tools to enhance fifth graders' reading comprehension achievement.

[1]  M. Horvat,et al.  Effects of Collaborative Peer Tutoring on Urban Seventh Graders , 1995 .

[2]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[3]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Explaining the Reasoning Associated with Using Reading Strategies. , 1987 .

[4]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  ClassWide Peer Tutoring and the Prevention of School Failure , 1995 .

[5]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  From Social Cognition to Metacognition , 1998 .

[6]  Hope J. Hartman.  Developing Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge and Skills , 2001 .

[7]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. , 1987 .

[8]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. , 1988 .

[9]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics , 1999 .

[10]  E. Corte,et al.  Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: a design experiment. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[11]  J. Fantuzzo,et al.  Effects of Parent Involvement in Isolation or in Combination with Peer Tutoring on Student Self-Concept and Mathematics Achievement. , 1995 .

[12]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[13]  C. Teddlie,et al.  The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research , 1999 .

[14]  Annette F. Gourgey.  Metacognition in basic skills instruction , 1998 .

[15]  Joop J. Hox,et al.  Applied Multilevel Analysis. , 1995 .

[16]  The classwide peer tutoring program: implementation factors moderating students' achievement. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[17]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[18]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Improving Text Comprehension Strategies in Reading and Listening Settings. , 1998 .

[19]  John W. Fantuzzo,et al.  An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings , 1990 .

[20]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing Students' Helping Behavior during Peer-Mediated Instruction with Conceptual Mathematical Explanations , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  P. V. Meter,et al.  A Quasi-experimental Validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with Low-Achieving Second-Grade Readers. , 1996 .

[22]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation , 1986 .

[23]  M. Pressley.  What should reading instructional research be the research of , 1999 .

[24]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Nature of Student Interactions During Peer Tutoring With and Without Prior Training and Experience , 1994 .

[25]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  The Peer Tutoring Handbook: Promoting Co-operative Learning , 1988 .

[26]  Deborah C. Simmons.  Importance of Instructional Complexity and Role Reciprocity to Classwide Peer Tutoring. , 1994 .

[27]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[28]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[29]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology , 2000 .

[30]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making Classrooms More Responsive to Diversity , 1997 .

[31]  Karen Linn Bierman,et al.  Effects of Role and Assignment Rationale on Attitudes Formed During Peer Tutoring. , 1981, Journal of educational psychology.

[32]  C. Fitz-Gibbon.  Peer Tutoring as a Teaching Strategy , 1988 .

[33]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Psychological Adjustment: A Component Analysis. , 1989 .

[34]  Charles Greenwood,et al.  Classwide Peer Tutoring , 1986, Exceptional children.

[35]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Improving Peers' Helping Behavior to Students with Learning Disabilities during Mathematics Peer Tutoring , 1996 .

[36]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities Who Use English as a Second Language , 1996, The Elementary School Journal.

[37]  W. Schneider,et al.  Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4 , 1999 .

[38]  Marie-France Ehrlich,et al.  Cognitive and Motivational Determinants of Reading Comprehension in Good and Poor Readers , 1993 .

[39]  Karen K. Wixson,et al.  Becoming a strategic reader , 1983 .

[40]  Elinor Scarbrough,et al.  Research strategies in the social sciences : a guide to new approaches , 1998 .

[41]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Examining the Context of Strategy Instruction , 1991 .

[42]  Ita G. G. Kreft,et al.  Multilevel Analysis Methods , 1994 .

[43]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Explicit Teaching and Peer Tutoring on the Reading Achievement of Learning-Disabled and Low-Performing Students in Regular Classrooms , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[44]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategies That Improve Children's Memory and Comprehension of Text , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[45]  D P MacKinnon,et al.  Multilevel Mediation Modeling in Group-Based Intervention Studies , 1999, Evaluation review.

[46]  Risto Lehtonen,et al.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2005 .

[47]  Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of Classwide Peer Tutoring used at the elementary school. , 1993 .

[48]  Lauren R. Heller,et al.  Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. , 1992 .

[49]  C. Juel.  Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. , 1988 .

[50]  K. Topping.  The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature , 1996 .

[51]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Efficacy of Peer Tutoring in Reading for Students with Disabilities: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. , 1991 .

[52]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Becoming a skilled reader , 1988 .

[53]  Janice F. Almasi,et al.  Beyond Direct Explanation: Transactional Instruction of Reading Comprehension Strategies , 1992, The Elementary School Journal.

[54]  R. Weisberg.  1980s: A Change in Focus of Reading Comprehension Research: A Review of Reading/Learning Disabilities Research Based on an Interactive Model of Reading , 1988 .

[55]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research , 1994 .