When Mommy Comes to the Rescue of Statistics: Infants Combine Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cues to Segment Speech

Transitional Probability (TP) computations are regarded as a powerful learning mechanism that is functional early in development and has been proposed as an initial bootstrapping device for speech segmentation. However, a recent study casts doubt on the robustness of early statistical word-learning. Johnson and Tyler (2010)showed that when 8-month-olds are presented with artificial languages where TPs between syllables are reliable cues to word boundaries but that contain words of varying length, infants fail to show word segmentation. Given previous evidence that familiar words facilitate segmentation (Bortfeld, Morgan, Golinkoff, & Rathbun, 2005), we investigated the conditions under which 8-month-old French-learning infants can succeed in segmenting an artificial language. We found that infants can use TPs to segment a language of uniform length words (Experiment 1) and a language of nonuniform length words containing the familiar word “maman” (/mamã/, mommy in French; Experiment 2), but not a similar language of nonuniform length words containing the pseudo-word /mãma/ (Experiment 3). We interpret these findings as evidence that 8-month-olds can use familiar words and TPs in combination to segment fluent speech, providing initial evidence for 8-month-olds' ability to combine top-down and bottom-up speech segmentation procedures.

[1]  J. Bertoncini,et al.  Phonetic Specificity in Early Lexical Acquisition: New Evidence from Consonants in Coda Positions , 2009, Language and speech.

[2]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[3]  J. Mehler,et al.  Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prosodic Structure in Early Word Segmentation: ERP Evidence From Dutch Ten-Month-Olds. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[5]  Linda Polka,et al.  Word Segmentation in Monolingual Infants Acquiring Canadian English and Canadian French: Native Language, Cross-Dialect, and Cross-Language Comparisons. , 2012, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[6]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[7]  J. Mehler,et al.  Linguistic Constraints on Statistical Computations , 2005, Psychological science.

[8]  Thierry Nazzi,et al.  Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences , 2006 .

[9]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[10]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[11]  J. Morgan,et al.  Mommy and Me , 2005, Psychological science.

[12]  Charles D. Yang.  Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[14]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[15]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[16]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[17]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities , 2009, Cognition.

[18]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to allophonic differences , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[21]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[22]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Some Beginnings of Word Comprehension in 6-Month-Olds , 1999 .

[23]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[24]  Daniel Swingley,et al.  Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  T. Nazzi,et al.  Better Processing of Consonantal Over Vocalic Information in Word Learning at 16 Months of Age. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[26]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  E. W. Ames,et al.  A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. , 1988 .

[28]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  English-learning Infants' Segmentation of Verbs from Fluent Speech , 2005, Language and speech.

[29]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Six-month-olds' Detection of Clauses Embedded in Continuous Speech: Effects of Prosodic Well-formedness , 2022 .

[30]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. , 2010, Developmental science.

[31]  Mary R. Newsome,et al.  The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-Learning Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. , 2009, Child development.

[33]  Boris New,et al.  Beyond stop consonants: Consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition , 2007 .

[34]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Stress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation , 2005, Cognition.

[35]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[36]  Marcela Peña,et al.  ON THE DIFFERENT ROLES OF VOWELS AND CONSONANTS IN SPEECH PROCESSING AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2003 .

[37]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics. , 2009, Developmental science.

[38]  T. Nazzi.  Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels , 2005, Cognition.

[39]  Casey Lew-Williams,et al.  Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy. , 2011, Developmental science.

[40]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Can Infants Map Meaning to Newly Segmented Words? , 2007, Psychological science.

[41]  A. Endress,et al.  Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream , 2007, Cognition.

[42]  Thierry Nazzi,et al.  Words and syllables in fluent speech segmentation by French-learning infants: An ERP study , 2010, Brain Research.

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for prelinguistic infants' word recognition in continuous speech. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[44]  Ariel Gout,et al.  Étapes précoces de l'acquisition du lexique , 2001 .