Independent Evaluation of the Speech Perception Abilities of Children with the Nucleus 22‐Channel Cochlear Implant System

The performance of 28 children with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant, who had used the device an average of 1.7 yr, was examined on a battery of speech perception measures. All children demonstrated better speech perception skills with the implant than they had in the preimplant condition with hearing aids. With the Nucleus implant, 61% of the children demonstrated some open-set speech recognition and another 14% demonstrated closed-set speech recognition. Scores on the tests were corrected for guessing and a hierarchy of test difficulty was developed. The results revealed systematic differences in performance as a function of perception task and test format. The results of regression analyses, which were performed to identify predictors of success, showed that communication mode made a significant unique contribution to the variance in performance among subjects on an open-set word recognition test. When the scores of the children who used oral or total communication were compared on the full battery of tests, however, there were few significant group differences.

[1]  A. M. Robbins,et al.  Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[2]  G M Clark,et al.  Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  A E Geers,et al.  Predicting long-term benefits from single-channel cochlear implants in profoundly hearing-impaired children. , 1988, The American journal of otology.

[4]  W. G. Hardy,et al.  Pediatric audiology. , 1962, The Pediatric clinics of North America.

[5]  P. Blamey,et al.  Results for two children using a multiple-electrode intracochlear implant. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Hearing handicap as a function of central auditory abilities in the elderly. , 1991 .

[7]  John D. Richards Handbook of research design and social measurement , 1993 .

[8]  S. Staller,et al.  Pediatric performance with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[9]  M. Somers Speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants or hearing aids. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[10]  R. Tyler Speech perception with the nucleus cochlear implant in children trained with the auditory/verbal approach. , 1990, The American journal of otology.

[11]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. , 1976, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[12]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[13]  M F Dorman,et al.  Word recognition by 50 patients fitted with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[14]  W. House,et al.  Open-set speech recognition in children with a single-channel cochlear implant. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[15]  August B. Hollingshead,et al.  Two Factor Index of Social Position , 1957 .

[16]  B M Siegenthaler,et al.  Reliability of the TIP and DIP speech-hearing tests for children. , 1975, Journal of communication disorders.

[17]  N. Tye‐Murray,et al.  Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[18]  A E Carney,et al.  A comparison of speech discrimination with cochlear implants and tactile aids. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B L Scott,et al.  A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. J. Osberger Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. , 1986, ASHA monographs.