Using ε-Dominance for Hidden and Degenerated Pareto-Fronts

Scalable multi-objective test problems are known to be useful in testing and analyzing the abilities of algorithms. In this paper we focus on test problems with degenerated Pareto-fronts and provide an in-depth insight into the properties of some problems which show these characteristics. In some of the problems with degenerated fronts such as Distance Minimization Problem (DMP) with the Manhattan metric, it is very difficult to dominate some of the non-optimal solutions as the optimal solutions are hidden within a set of so called pseudo-optimal solutions. Hence the algorithms based on Pareto-domination criterion are shown to be inefficient. In this paper, we explore the pseudo-optimal solutions and examine how and why the use of ε-dominance can help to achieve a better approximation of the hidden Pareto-fronts or of degenerated fronts in general. We compare the performance of the ε-MOEA with 3 other algorithms (NSGA-II, NSGA-III and MOEA/D) and show that ε- dominance performs better when dealing with pseudo-optimal kind of solutions. Furthermore, we analyze the performance on the WFG3 test problem and illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of ε-dominance for this degenerated problem.

[1]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[2]  Sanaz Mostaghim,et al.  Properties of scalable distance minimization problems using the Manhattan metric , 2015, 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[3]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Visual examination of the behavior of EMO algorithms for many-objective optimization with many decision variables , 2014, 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[5]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[6]  DebK.,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[7]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Many-Objective Test Problems to Visually Examine the Behavior of Multiobjective Evolution in a Decision Space , 2010, PPSN.

[8]  R. Lyndon While,et al.  A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[9]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  A many-objective test problem for visually examining diversity maintenance behavior in a decision space , 2011, GECCO '11.

[11]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[13]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Many-objective and many-variable test problems for visual examination of multiobjective search , 2013, 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.