Life-cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Europe: comparing grain, oil and biodiesel import from Brazil

Abstract The purpose of this article is to present a life-cycle assessment of soybean methyl ester addressing three alternative pathways: biodiesel totally produced in Brazil and exported to Portugal; biodiesel produced in Portugal using soybean oil and soybean imported from Brazil. Soybean cultivation was assessed for four states in Brazil: Mato Grosso; Goias; Parana and Rio Grande do Sul. A life-cycle inventory and model of biodiesel was implemented, including land-use change, soybean cultivation, oil extraction and refining, transesterification and biodiesel transport. A sensitivity analysis of alternative multifunctionality procedures for dealing with co-products was performed. The lowest environmental impacts were calculated for mass allocation and the highest for price or energy allocation. Biodiesel produced in Portugal with imported soybean grain had the lowest impacts for all categories and soybean cultivation locations for mass allocation. For price or energy allocation, the pathway with the lowest environmental impacts was determined by the cultivation location. Land-use change had a high influence on the greenhouse gas intensity of biodiesel, while soybean cultivation and transport contributed most to the remaining impact categories. Soybean methyl ester (SME) used in Portugal has the lowest impacts when produced with oil or grain imported from Brazil, instead of importing directly SME. The environmental impacts of biodiesel can be reduced by avoiding land-use change, improving soybean yield and optimizing soybean transportation routes in Brazil.

[1]  Marcos Milan,et al.  Material flow determination through agricultural machinery management , 2010 .

[2]  Francisco Antonio Rocco Lahr,et al.  Life cycle assessment of medium density particleboard (MDP) produced in Brazil , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Nereu Augusto Streck,et al.  Improving node number simulation in soybean. , 2009 .

[4]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[5]  Shelie A. Miller,et al.  Use of Monte Carlo analysis to characterize nitrogen fluxes in agroecosystems. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  E. Gnansounou,et al.  Life cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Argentina for export , 2009 .

[7]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues , 2011 .

[8]  Timothy D. Searchinger,et al.  Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Soy-based US Biodiesel when Factoring in Emissions from Land Use Change , 2008 .

[9]  Maria Francesca Milazzo,et al.  Soy biodiesel pathways: Global prospects , 2013 .

[10]  Ursula Gabe,et al.  Trace elements in Brazilian agricultural limestones and mineral fertilizers , 1999 .

[11]  É. Castanheira,et al.  Environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil. , 2014 .

[12]  N. Halberg,et al.  LCA of soybean meal , 2008 .

[13]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Nitrous oxide emissions from liquid biofuel production in life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[14]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Global scale DAYCENT model analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies for cropped soils , 2009 .

[15]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Greenhouse gas assessment of soybean production: implications of land use change and different cultivation systems , 2013 .

[16]  Eros Comunello,et al.  From forest to waste: Assessment of the Brazilian soybean chain, using nitrogen as a marker. , 2008 .

[17]  Shelie A. Miller,et al.  Minimizing land use and nitrogen intensity of bioenergy. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Sven Gärtner,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Balances for the German Biofuels Quota Legislation Methodological Guidance and Default Values , 2007 .

[19]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment , 2009 .

[20]  Hong Huo,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of soybean-derived biodiesel and renewable fuels. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Environmental life-cycle assessment of rapeseed-based biodiesel: Alternative cultivation systems and locations , 2014 .

[22]  Wouter Achten,et al.  Implications of biodiesel-induced land-use changes for CO2 emissions: Case studies in Tropical America, Africa, and Southeast Asia , 2011 .

[23]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Large-scale bioenergy production from soybeans and switchgrass in Argentina: Part B. Environmental and socio-economic impacts on a regional level , 2009 .

[24]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans , 2008 .

[25]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Economic allocation: Examples and derived decision tree , 2004 .

[26]  Jian Hou,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biodiesel from soybean, jatropha and microalgae in China conditions , 2011 .

[27]  Tuomas Mattila,et al.  Comparing priority setting in integrated hazardous substance assessment and in life cycle impact assessment , 2011 .

[28]  Clive James,et al.  Global status of commercialized transgenic crops : 1999 , 1999 .

[29]  T. Bruulsema,et al.  Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects , 2009 .

[30]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy, nutrients balance, and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil , 2009 .

[31]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Contribution of N2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first‐generation biofuels , 2009 .

[32]  Shelie A. Miller,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of petroleum and soybean-based lubricants. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Todd A. Crane,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Climate Science, Development Practice, and Policy Interactions in Dryland Agroecological Systems , 2011 .

[34]  Agência Nacional do Petróleo,et al.  Anuário Estatístico Brasileiro do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis 2009 , 2009 .

[35]  Pedro Marques,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal , 2014 .

[36]  G. Psacharopoulos.  Overview and methodology , 1991 .

[37]  F. Freire,et al.  Life-cycle GHG assessment of soybean biodiesel , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST).

[38]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: a case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[39]  B. Dale,et al.  Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States—corn-based ethanol and soybean oil , 2009 .

[40]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  The energy balance of soybean biodiesel in Brazil: a case study , 2011 .

[41]  Tan Piqiang,et al.  Life cycle energy, environment and economic assessment of soybean-based biodiesel as an alternative automotive fuel in China , 2008 .

[42]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): Assessing the implications of allocation , 2006 .

[43]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil , 2010 .

[44]  T. Ponsioen,et al.  Calculating land use change in carbon footprints of agricultural products as an impact of current land use , 2012 .