Big Data Management Canvas: A Reference Model for Value Creation from Data

Many big data projects are technology-driven and thus, expensive and inefficient. It is often unclear how to exploit existing data resources and map data, systems and analytics results to actual use cases. Existing big data reference models are mostly either technological or business-oriented in nature, but do not consequently align both aspects. To address this issue, a reference model for big data management is proposed that operationalizes value creation from big data by linking business targets with technical implementation. The purpose of this model is to provide a goal- and value-oriented framework to effectively map and plan purposeful big data systems aligned with a clear value proposition. Based on an epistemic model that conceptualizes big data management as a cognitive system, the solution space of data value creation is divided into five layers: preparation, analysis, interaction, effectuation, and intelligence. To operationalize the model, each of these layers is subdivided into corresponding business and IT aspects to create a link from use cases to technological implementation. The resulting reference model, the big data management canvas, can be applied to classify and extend existing big data applications and to derive and plan new big data solutions, visions, and strategies for future projects. To validate the model in the context of existing information systems, the paper describes three cases of big data management in existing companies.

[1]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  From data to value: A nine-factor framework for data-based value creation in information-intensive services , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[2]  Philip W. Anderson,et al.  More Is Different Broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science , 1972 .

[3]  Dilpreet Singh,et al.  A survey on platforms for big data analytics , 2014, Journal of Big Data.

[4]  Michael Kaufmann Towards a reference model for big data management , 2016 .

[5]  Wo L. Chang,et al.  NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 1, Definitions , 2019 .

[6]  Maarit Mäkelä,et al.  Knowing Through Making: The Role of the Artefact in Practice-led Research , 2007 .

[7]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Achieving and Sustaining Business-IT Alignment , 1999 .

[8]  Wo L. Chang,et al.  NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 2, Big Data Taxonomies , 2015 .

[9]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organisational knowing , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Gregory Wheeler,et al.  Machine Epistemology and Big Data , 2016 .

[11]  Steven L. Alter Nothing is more practical than a good conceptual artifact… which may be a theory, framework, model, metaphor, paradigm or perhaps some other abstraction , 2017, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[13]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[14]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  The Beckman Report on Database Research , 2014, SGMD.

[15]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  A survey of open source tools for machine learning with big data in the Hadoop ecosystem , 2015, Journal of Big Data.

[16]  Cees T. A. M. de Laat,et al.  Addressing big data issues in Scientific Data Infrastructure , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[17]  Matthias Hemmje,et al.  Modeling and Qualitative Evaluation of a Management Canvas for Big Data Applications , 2017, DATA.

[18]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Big Data , 2014, Wirtschaftsinf..

[19]  Lei Gu,et al.  Memory or Time: Performance Evaluation for Iterative Operation on Hadoop and Spark , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications & 2013 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing.

[20]  Niklas Luhmann Erkenntnis als Konstruktion , 1988 .

[21]  Ahmad Ghoneim,et al.  Managing emergent knowledge through deferred action design principles: The case of ecommerce virtual teams , 2011, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[22]  Martin Hilbert,et al.  The World’s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information , 2011, Science.

[23]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[24]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  A multidisciplinary perspective of big data in management research , 2017 .

[25]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[26]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Exploring Knowledge Emergence: From Chaos to Organizational Knowledge , 2002 .

[27]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Big data, big risks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  P. Anderson More is different. , 1972, Science.

[29]  Helfert,et al.  Effectuation and Its Implications for Socio-Technical Design Science Research in Information Systems , 2018 .