Evaluation of the impact of channel geometry and rough elements arrangement in hydraulic jump energy dissipation via SVM

Rough bed channels are one of the appurtenances used to dissipate the extra energy of the flow through hydraulic jump. The aim of this paper is to assess the effects of channel geometry and rough boundary conditions (i.e., rectangular, trapezoidal, and expanding channels with different rough elements) in predicting the hydraulic jump energy dissipation using support vector machine (SVM) as a meta-model approach. Using different experimental data series, different models were developed with and without considering dimensional analysis. The results approved capability of the SVM model in predicting the relative energy dissipation. It was found that the developed models for expanding channel with central sill performed more successfully and, for this case, superior performance was obtained for the model with parameters Fr1 and h1/B. Considering the rectangular and trapezoidal channels, the model with parameters Fr1, (h2−h1)/h1, W/Z led to better predictions. It was observed that between two types of strip and staggered rough elements, strip type led to more accurate results. The obtained results showed that the developed models for the case of simulation based on dimensional analysis yielded better predictions. The sensitivity analysis results showed that Froude number had the most significant impact on the modeling.

[1]  Nallamuthu Rajaratnam,et al.  Hydraulic Jumps Below Abrupt Symmetrical Expansions , 1968 .

[2]  Shie-Yui Liong,et al.  Forecasting of hydrologic time series with ridge regression in feature space , 2007 .

[3]  O. Giustolisi Using genetic programming to determine Chèzy resistance coefficient in corrugated channels , 2004 .

[4]  Roger Bremen,et al.  Expanding stilling basin , 1990 .

[5]  Abbas Parsaie,et al.  Prediction of side weir discharge coefficient by support vector machine technique , 2016 .

[6]  Jose R. Dorronsoro,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  P. Yadav HYDRAULIC JUMP ON CORRUGATED BEDS , 2006 .

[8]  Joseph B. Franzini,et al.  Fluid Mechanics with Engineering Applications. 6th Ed. By R. L.DAUGHERTY and J. B. FRANZINI. McGraw-Hill. 1965. 574 pp. $9.95 or 80s. Fluid Dynamics. By J. W. DAILY and D. R. F. HARLEMAN. Addison Wesley. 1966. 454 pp. $12.50 or 94s. , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  V. Babovic,et al.  On inducing equations for vegetation resistance , 2007 .

[10]  E. A. Elevatorski Hydraulic energy dissipators , 1959 .

[11]  H. Md. Azamathulla,et al.  Use of Gene-Expression Programming to Estimate Manning’s Roughness Coefficient for High Gradient Streams , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[12]  K. G. R. Raju,et al.  Analysis Of Flow Over Baffle Blocks And End Sills , 1980 .

[13]  Vladimir Vapnik Introduction: Four Periods in the Research of the Learning Problem , 1995 .

[14]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[15]  H. Md. Azamathulla,et al.  GEP to predict characteristics of a hydraulic jump over a rough bed , 2016 .

[16]  S. Liong,et al.  EC-SVM approach for real-time hydrologic forecasting , 2004 .

[17]  M. Padmanabhan Hydraulic Jump In Non-Prismatic Rectangular Channels , 1985 .

[18]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Classical hydraulic jump: sequent depths , 1989 .

[19]  M. Alami,et al.  Modeling open channel flow resistance with dune bedform via heuristic and nonlinear approaches , 2018 .

[20]  Ahmet Bilgil Correlation and distribution of shear stress for turbulent flow in a smooth rectangular open channel , 2005 .

[21]  Vladan Babovic,et al.  Velocity predictions in compound channels with vegetated floodplains using genetic programming , 2003 .

[22]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Hydraulic jump in non-prismatic rectangular channels , 1985 .

[23]  S. Gandhi Characteristics of Hydraulic Jump , 2014 .

[24]  N. Rajaratnam,et al.  Transition from Hydraulic Jump to Open Channel Flow , 1996 .