Right Decisions from Wrong Predictions: A Mechanism Design Alternative to Individual Calibration

Decision makers often need to rely on imperfect probabilistic forecasts. While average performance metrics are typically available, it is difficult to assess the quality of individual forecasts and the corresponding utilities. To convey confidence about individual predictions to decision-makers, we propose a compensation mechanism ensuring that the forecasted utility matches the actually accrued utility. While a naive scheme to compensate decision-makers for prediction errors can be exploited and might not be sustainable in the long run, we propose a mechanism based on fair bets and online learning that provably cannot be exploited. We demonstrate an application showing how passengers could confidently optimize individual travel plans based on flight delay probabilities estimated by an airline.

[1]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  Fairness through awareness , 2011, ITCS '12.

[2]  Christopher G Chute,et al.  Preemptive genotyping for personalized medicine: design of the right drug, right dose, right time-using genomic data to individualize treatment protocol. , 2014, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  M. Tribus,et al.  Probability theory: the logic of science , 2003 .

[4]  Stefano Ermon,et al.  Individual Calibration with Randomized Forecasting , 2020, ICML.

[5]  Gábor Lugosi,et al.  Prediction, learning, and games , 2006 .

[6]  A. Dawid Calibration-Based Empirical Probability , 1985 .

[7]  M. Forehand,et al.  When Is Honesty The Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism , 2002 .

[8]  Guy N. Rothblum,et al.  Calibration for the (Computationally-Identifiable) Masses , 2017, ArXiv.

[9]  C. Rotimi,et al.  Genetic Variants Associated with Complex Human Diseases Show Wide Variation across Multiple Populations , 2009, Public Health Genomics.

[10]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks , 2017, ICML.

[11]  G. Shafer,et al.  Algorithmic Learning in a Random World , 2005 .

[12]  Tengyu Ma,et al.  Verified Uncertainty Calibration , 2019, NeurIPS.

[13]  Milos Hauskrecht,et al.  Obtaining Well Calibrated Probabilities Using Bayesian Binning , 2015, AAAI.

[14]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores , 2016, ITCS.

[15]  E. Candès,et al.  The limits of distribution-free conditional predictive inference , 2019, Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA.

[16]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  From External to Internal Regret , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[17]  Stefano Ermon,et al.  Estimating Uncertainty Online Against an Adversary , 2016, AAAI.

[18]  Joseph Y. Halpern Reasoning about uncertainty , 2003 .